A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States

Medical Care

Volumn 43, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 736-749

  Sullivan, Patrick W ^a   Lawrence, William F ^b   Ghushchyan, Vahram ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chronic disease; Cost utility analysis; Health related quality of life; Utility

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONSUMER; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES; VALUE OF LIFE;

EID: 22244440228     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000172050.67085.4f     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC, eds. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
2. Drummond MF. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, 2nd ed. Oxford: New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.
3. Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1947.
4. Torrance GW, Thomas WH, Sackett DL. A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv Res. 1972;7:118-133.
5. Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health-state preferences - II: scaling methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:459-471.
6. Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, et al. Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995;7:490-502.
7. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199-208.
8. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37:53-72.
9. Kaplan RM, Anderson JP. A general health policy model: update and applications. Health Serv Res. 1988;23:203-235.
10. Tengs TO, Wallace A. One thousand health-related quality-of-life estimates. Med Care. 2000;38:583-637.
11. Lenert L, Kaplan RM. Validity and interpretation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life. Med Care. 2000;38(suppl): II138-150.
12. Fryback DG, Lawrence WF Jr. Dollars may not buy as many QALYs as we think: a problem with defining quality-of-life adjustments. Med Decis Making. 1997;17:276-284.
13. Fryback DG, Dasbach EJ, Klein R, et al. The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study: initial catalog of health-state quality factors. Med Decis Making. 1993;13:89-102.
14. Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, et al. Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ. 1998;316:736-741.
15. Gold MR, Franks P, McCoy KI, et al. Toward consistency in cost-utility analyses: using national measures to create condition-specific values. Med Care. 1998;36:778-792.
16. Bell CM, Chapman RH, Stone PW, et al. An off-the-shelf help list: a comprehensive catalog of preference scores from published cost-utility analyses. Med Decis Making. 2001;21:288-294.
17. Conner-Spady B, Suarez-Almazor ME. Variation in the estimation of quality-adjusted life-years by different preference-based instruments. Med Care. 2003;41:791-801.
18. Erickson P, Wilson R, Shannon I. Years of Healthy Life. Healthy People 2000, Statistical Notes No. 7. Hyattsville, MD: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Health Statistics; April 1995. DHHS publication PHS 95-1237 4-1484. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statnt/statnt07. pdf.
19. Gold MR, Stevenson D, Fryback DG. HALYS and QALYS and DALYS, Oh My: similarities and differences in summary measures of population Health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:115-134.
20. Elixhauser A, Andrews RM, Fox S. Clinical Classifications for Health Policy Research: Discharge Statistics by Principal Diagnosis and Procedure. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Policy and Research; 1993. AHCPR Publication No. 93-0043.
21. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Available at: http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/PUFFiles/H52/H52doc.htm. Accessed November 10, 2003.
22. The EuroQol Group. Available at: http://www.euroqol.org/download/ ref.pdf. Accessed November 11, 2003.
23. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
24. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care. 2005;43.
25. The ICD-9 to CCC Crosswalk. Available at: www.meps.ahrq. Appendix 2.
26. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Computing Standard Errors for MEPS Estimates. Available at: www.meps.ahrq.gov. Accessed September 2003.
27. Austin PC, Escobar M, Kopec JA. The use of the Tobit model for analyzing measures of health status. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:901-910.
28. Grootendorst P. Censoring in statistical models of health status: what happens when one can do better than '1'. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:911-914.
29. Green WH. Econometric Analysis, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2000.
30. Maddala GS. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
31. Powell J. Least absolute deviations estimation for the censored regression model. J Econometrics. 1984;25:303-325.
32. http://www.stata.com/stb/stb58.
33. Guyatt GH, Osoba D, Wu AW, et al. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:371-383.
34. Walters SJ, Brazier JE. What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:4.
35. Grootendorst P, Feeny D, Furlong W. Health Utilities Index Mark 3: evidence of construct validity for stroke and arthritis in a population health survey. Med Care. 2000;38:290-299.
36. Briggs AH, Goeree R, Blackhouse G, et al. Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: choosing between treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Med Decis Making. 2002;22:290-308.
37. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997;35:1095-1108.
38. Glick HA, Polsky D, Willke RJ, et al. A comparison of preference assessment instruments used in a clinical trial: responses to the visual analog scale from the EuroQol EQ-5D and the Health Utilities Index. Med Decis Making. 1999;19:265-275.
39. Wu AW, Jacobson KL, Frick KD, et al. Validity and responsiveness of the EuroQol as a measure of health-related quality of life in people enrolled in an AIDS clinical trial. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:273-282.
40. Macran S, Weatherly H, Kind P. Measuring population health: a comparison of three generic health status measures. Med Care. 2003;41:218-231.
41. Richardson J. Cost utility analysis: what should be measured? Soc Sci Med. 1994;39:7-21.
42. Llewellyn-Thomas H, Sutherland HJ, Tibshirani R, et al. The measurement of patients' values in medicine. Med Decis Making. 1982;2:449-462.
43. Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ. 1986;5:1-30.
44. Luo N, Chew LH, Fong KY, et al. A comparison of the EuroQol-5D and the Health Utilities Index mark 3 in patients with rheumatic disease. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:2268-2274.
45. Bosch JL, Hunink MG. Comparison of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and the EuroQol EQ-5D in patients treated for intermittent claudication. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:591-601.
46. Stewart AL, Napoles-Springer A. Health-related quality-of-life assessments in diverse population groups in the United States. Med Care. 2000;38(suppl):II102-124.
47. Johnson TP, O'Rourke D, Chavez Net. al.Cultural variations in the interpretation of health survey questions. In: Warnecke RB, ed. Health Survey Research Methods. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1996:57-62.