Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: A comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 144, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 304-310

  Naidu, Devan ^a   Freer, Terrence J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DENTAL PROCEDURE; EQUIPMENT; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; ODONTOMETRY; STATISTICS; TOOTH; VALIDATION STUDY;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ODONTOMETRY; TOOTH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84881155477     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.011     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. D.R. Crosby, and C.G. Alexander The occurrence of tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 95 1989 457 461
2. M.L. Quimby, K.W. Vig, R.G. Rashid, and A.R. Firestone The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models Angle Orthod 74 2004 298 303
3. U.R. Schirmer, and W.A. Wiltshire Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112 1997 676 680
4. M. Santoro, S. Galkin, M. Teredesai, O.F. Nicolay, and T.J. Cangialosi Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124 2003 101 105
5. D. Naidu, J. Scott, D. Ong, and C.T. Ho Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for Bolton analyses Aust Orthod J 25 2009 97 103
6. A.M. Cuperus, M.C. Harms, F.A. Rangel, E.M. Bronkhorst, J.G. Schols, and K.H. Breuning Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 142 2012 308 313
7. M.G. Wiranto, W.P. Engelbrecht, H.E. Tutein Nolthenius, W.J. van der Meer, and Y. Ren Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 143 2013 140 147
8. W.J. Houston The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements Am J Orthod 83 1983 382 390
9. C.T. Roberts, and S. Richmond The design and analysis of reliability studies for the use of epidemiological and audit indices in orthodontics Br J Orthod 24 1997 139 147
10. A. McNaught, and A. Wilkinson IUPAC compendium of chemical terminology 2nd ed. 1997 Blackwell Science Oxford, United Kingdom Available at: http://www.iupac.org Accessed September 20, 2012
11. O.J. Dunn Multiple comparisons among means J Am Stat Assoc 56 1961 52 64
12. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 1986 307 310
13. D.R. Stevens, C. Flores-Mir, B. Nebbe, D.W. Raboud, G. Heo, and P.W. Major Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 2006 794 803
14. R.M. Coleman, J.H. Hembree, and F.N. Weber Dimensional stability of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material Am J Orthod 75 1979 438 446
15. W.C. Shellhart, D.W. Lange, G.T. Kluemper, E.P. Hicks, and A.L. Kaplan Reliability of the Bolton tooth-size analysis when applied to crowded dentitions Angle Orthod 65 1995 327 334
16. W.R. Proffit, H.W. Fields, and D.M. Sarver Contemporary orthodontics 4th ed. 2007 Mosby St Louis
17. British Standards Institution Precision of test methods 1: guide for the determination and reproducibility for a standard test method (BS 597, Part 1) 1975 British Standards Institution London, United Kingdom