Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 144, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 916-922

  Akyalcin, Sercan ^a   Cozad, Benjamin E ^a   English, Jeryl D ^a   Colville, Clark D ^a   Laman, Stephen ^a  

^a Department of Orthodontics ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL PROCEDURE; EQUIPMENT; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; LASER; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTICS; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SKULL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH ARCH; VALIDATION STUDY;

CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LASERS; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; ORTHODONTICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SKULL;

EID: 84888621212     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.024     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. P.S. Fleming, V. Marinho, and A. Johal Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review Orthod Craniofac Res 14 2011 1 16
2. S. Akyalcin Are digital models replacing plaster casts? Dentistry 1 2011 e102
3. M.L. Quimby, K.W. Vig, R.G. Rashid, and A.R. Firestone The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models Angle Orthod 74 2004 298 303
4. B. Rheude, P.L. Sadowsky, A. Ferriera, and A. Jacobson An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning Angle Orthod 75 2005 300 304
5. D.R. Stevens, C. Flores-Mir, B. Nebbe, D.W. Raboud, G. Heo, and P.W. Major Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 2006 794 803
6. J.J. Tomassetti, L.J. Taloumis, J.M. Denny, and J.R. Fischer Jr. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method Angle Orthod 71 2001 351 357
7. R.W. Goonewardene, M.S. Goonewardene, J.M. Razza, and K. Murray Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models Aust Orthod J 24 2008 83 90
8. M.F. Leifert, M.M. Leifert, S.S. Efstratiadis, and T.J. Cangialosi Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136 2009 16.e1 16.e4
9. S.R. Mullen, C.A. Martin, P. Ngan, and M. Gladwin Accuracy of space analysis with eModels and plaster models Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132 2007 346 352
10. G. Torassian, C.H. Kau, J.D. English, J. Powers, H.I. Bussa, and A. Salas-Lopez Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials Angle Orthod 80 2010 474 481
11. J. Mah The evolution of digital study models J Clin Orthod 9 2007 557 561
12. K.G. Lightheart, J.D. English, C.H. Kau, S. Akyalcin, H.I. Bussa Jr., and K.R. McGrory Surface analysis of study models generated from OrthoCAD and cone-beam computed tomography imaging Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 141 2012 686 693
13. M.O. Lagravère, J. Carey, R.W. Toogood, and P.W. Major Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134 2008 112 116
14. B. Tarazona, J.M. Llamas, R. Cibrian, J.L. Gandia, and V. Paredes A comparison between dental measurements taken from CBCT models and those taken from a digital method Eur J Orthod 35 2013 1 6
15. R. Ganguly, A. Ruprecht, S. Vincent, J. Hellstein, S. Timmons, and F. Qian Accuracy of linear measurement in the Galileos cone beam computed tomography under simulated clinical conditions Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40 2011 299 305
16. M.G. Torres, P.S. Campos, N.P. Segundo, M. Navarro, and I. Crusoé-Rebello Accuracy of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes Implant Dent 21 2012 150 155
17. C.C. Leung, L. Palomo, R. Griffith, and M.G. Hans Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137 Suppl 2010 S109 S119
18. R. Patcas, L. Müller, O. Ullrich, and T. Peltomäki Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 141 2012 41 50
19. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Measuring agreement in method comparison studies Stat Methods Med Res 8 1999 135 160
20. S. Baumgaertel, J.M. Palomo, L. Palomo, and M.G. Hans Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136 2009 19 28
21. E. Nguyen, D. Boychuk, and M. Orellana Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in predicting the diameter of unerupted teeth Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140 2011 e59 e66
22. J.F. Sherrard, P.E. Rossouw, B.W. Benson, R. Carrillo, and P.H. Buschang Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137 Suppl 2010 S100 S108
23. J. Damstra, Z. Fourie, J.J. Huddleston Slater, and Y. Ren Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137 2010 16.e1 16.e6
24. American Dental Association. ADA statement: diagnostic radiation procedures must be used sparingly to reduce dental radiation risk. Available at: http://www.ada.org/5081.aspx. Accessed February 6, 2013.
25. S. Logozzo, G. Franceschini, A. Kilpela, M. Caponi, L. Governi, and L. Blois A comparative analysis of intraoral 3d digital scanners for restorative dentistry Internet J Med Technol 5 1 2011
26. P. Seelbach, C. Brueckel, and B. Wöstmann Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow Clin Oral Investig 17 2013 1759 1764
27. F. Garino, and B. Garino The iOC intraoral scanner and Invisalign: a new paradigm J Clin Orthod 46 2012 115 121
28. H. Crew The Wave Theory of Light - Memoirs by Huygens, Young and Fresnel 1900 American Book Company New York
29. A. Ender, and A. Mehl Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions - an in-vitro study Int J Comput Dent 14 2011 11 21
30. J. Phark, A.L. Oliveira, N. Sartori, E.M.A. Giro, R. Kahn, and S. Duarte Marginal fit of all-ceramic crowns using conventional and digital impressions [abstract] J Dent Res 91 Spec Iss A 2012 991
31. M. Kim, H. Song, S. Heo, J. Han, J. Koak, Y. Lim, S. Kim, S. Kim, I. Yeo, and S. Kim Accuracy of an intraoral digital impression using parallel confocal imaging [abstract] J Dent Res 91 Spec Iss B 2012 995