Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy digraph and matrix approach

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 805-816

  Liu, Hu Chen ^a,b   Chen, Yi Zeng ^a   You, Jian Xin ^a,b   Li, Hui ^b,c  

^a SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c TONGJI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Digraph and matrix approach; Failure mode and effects analysis; Fuzzy sets; Risk evaluation

Indexed keywords

DIRECTED GRAPHS; FAILURE MODES; FUZZY SETS; GRAPH THEORY; LINGUISTICS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES; FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS; LINGUISTIC TERMS; MATRIX APPROACH; POTENTIAL FAILURES; RELATIVE WEIGHTS; RISK EVALUATION; RISK PRIORITY NUMBER;

FAILURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84901727042     PISSN: 09565515     EISSN: 15728145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-014-0915-6     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Akman, G., Özcan, B., & Hatipoğlu, T. (2013). Fuzzy multi criteria decision making approach to innovative strategies based on Miles and Snow typology. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (in Press).
2. Ayağ, Z., & Özdemir, R. G. (2006). A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tool alternatives. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 17(2), 179–190.
3. Ayağ, Z., Samanlioglu, F., & Büyüközkan, G. (2013). A fuzzy QFD approach to determine supply chain management strategies in the dairy industry. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(6), 1111–1122.
4. Baykasoglu, A. (2012). A review and analysis of “graph theoretical-matrix permanent” approach to decision making with example applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1–33.
5. Baykasoğlu, A. (2009). A practical fuzzy digraph model for modeling manufacturing flexibility. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 40(6), 475–489.
6. Bowles, J. B., & Peláez, C. E. (1995). Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 50(2), 203–213.
7. Chang, D. S., Chung, J. H., Sun, K. L. P., & Yang, F. C. (2012). A novel approach for evaluating the risk of health care failure modes. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(6), 3967–3974.
8. Chang, K. H., Chang, Y. C., & Lai, P. T. (2013). Applying the concept of exponential approach to enhance the assessment capability of FMEA. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1–15 (in Press).
9. Chang, K. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2011). Evaluating the risk of failure using the fuzzy OWA and DEMATEL method. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22(2), 113–129.
10. Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 1–9.
11. Chin, K. S., Chan, A., & Yang, J. B. (2008). Development of a fuzzy FMEA based product design system. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 36(7), 633–649.
12. Chin, K. S., Wang, Y. M., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J. B. (2009). Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach. Computers and Operations Research, 36(6), 1768–1779.
13. Chou, C. (2003). The canonical representation of multiplication operation on triangular fuzzy numbers. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 45(10), 1601–1610.
14. Darvish, M., Yasaei, M., & Saeedi, A. (2009). Application of the graph theory and matrix methods to contractor ranking. International Journal of Project Management, 27(6), 610–619.
15. Gandhi, O. P., & Agrawal, V. P. (1992). FMEA—A diagraph and matrix approach. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 35(2), 147–158.
16. Garcia, P. A. A., Schirru, R., & Frutuoso Emelo, P. F. (2005). A fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach for FMEA. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 46(3–4), 359–373.
17. Gargama, H., & Chaturvedi, S. K. (2011). Criticality assessment models for failure mode effects and criticality analysis using fuzzy logic. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 60(1), 102–110.
18. Jong, C. H., Tay, K. M., & Lim, C. P. (2013). Application of the fuzzy failure mode and effect analysis methodology to edible bird nest processing. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 96, 90–108.
19. Kahraman, C., Kaya, İ., & Şenvar, Ö. (2013). Healthcare failure mode and effects analysis under fuzziness. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 19(2), 538–552.
20. Koulouriotis, D. E., & Ketipi, M. K. (2011). A fuzzy digraph method for robot evaluation and selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 11901–11910.
21. Kutlu, A. C., & Ekmekçioğlu, M. (2012). Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 61–67.
22. Kwong, C. K., & Bai, H. (2002). A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 13(5), 367–377.
23. Lin, Q. L., Liu, H. C., Wang, D. J., & Liu, L. (2013). Integrating systematic layout planning with fuzzy constraint theory to design and optimize the facility layout for operating theatre in hospitals. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (in Press).
24. Liu, H. C., Liu, L., Bian, Q. H., Lin, Q. L., Dong, N., & Xu, P. C. (2011). Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 4403–4415.
25. Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Li, P. (2013a). Failure mode and effects analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid weighted Euclidean distance operator. International Journal of Systems Science (in Press).
26. Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Lin, Q. L. (2013b). Fuzzy failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning and belief rule-based methodology. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 62(1), 23–36.
27. Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Liu, N. (2013c). Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(2), 828–838.
28. Liu, H. C., Liu, L., Liu, N., & Mao, L. X. (2012). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 12926–12934.
29. Paramasivam, V., Senthil, V., & Rajam Ramasamy, N. (2011). Decision making in equipment selection: An integrated approach with digraph and matrix approach, AHP and ANP. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 54(9–12), 1233–1244.
30. Pillay, A., & Wang, J. (2003). Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 79(1), 69–85.
31. Rao, R. V. (2006). A decision-making framework model for evaluating flexible manufacturing systems using digraph and matrix methods. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 30(11–12), 1101–1110.
32. Rao, R. V., & Gandhi, O. P. (2002a). Digraph and matrix methods for the machinability evaluation of work materials. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 42(3), 321–330.
33. Rao, R. V., & Gandhi, O. P. (2002b). Failure cause analysis of machine tools using digraph and matrix methods. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 42(4), 521–528.
34. Rao, R. V., & Padmanabhan, K. K. (2006). Selection, identification and comparison of industrial robots using digraph and matrix methods. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 22(4), 373–383.
35. Rao, R. V., & Padmanabhan, K. K. (2007). Rapid prototyping process selection using graph theory and matrix approach. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 194(1), 81–88.
36. Sharma, R. K., Kumar, D., & Kumar, P. (2005). Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 22(9), 986–1004.
37. Song, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z., & Zhu, B. (2013). A rough TOPSIS approach for failure mode and effects analysis in uncertain environments. Quality and Reliability Engineering International (in Press).
38. Stamatis, D. H. (2003). Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. New York: ASQC Press.
39. Vinodh, S., Aravindraj, S., Narayanan, R. S., & Yogeshwaran, N. (2012). Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for rotary switches: A case study. The TQM Journal, 24(5), 461–475.
40. Wang, C. H., & Wu, H. S. (2014). A novel framework to evaluate programmable logic controllers: A fuzzy MCDM perspective. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (in Press).
41. Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J. B. (2009). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1195–1207.
42. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.
43. Zadeh, L. A. (1975a). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199–249.
44. Zadeh, L. A. (1975b). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-II. Information Sciences, 8(4), 301–357.
45. Zhang, Z. F., & Chu, X. N. (2011). Risk prioritization in failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 206–214.