Prediction of pavement roughness using a hybrid gene expression programming-neural network technique

Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition)

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 448-455

  Mazari, Mehran ^a   Rodriguez, Daniel D ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b 500 W University Avenue   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Gene expression programming; International roughness index; Long term pavement performance; Pavement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994709526     PISSN: 20957564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtte.2016.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alavi, A.H., Ameri, M., Gandomi, A.H., et al. Formulation of flow number of asphalt mixes using a hybrid computational method. Construction and Building Materials 25:3 (2011), 1338–1355.
2. Attoh-Okine, N.O., Predicting roughness progression in flexible pavements using artificial neural networks. The 3rd International Conference on Managing Pavements, San Antonio, 1994, 1994.
3. Attoh-Okine, N.O., Mensah, S., Nawaiseh, M., A new technique for using multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) in pavement roughness prediction. Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers-Transport 156:1 (2003), 51–56.
4. Choi, J.H., Adams, T.M., Bahia, H.U., Pavement roughness modeling using back-propagation neural networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 19:4 (2004), 295–303.
5. Elkins, G.E., Schmalzer, P., Thompson, T., et al. Long-term Pavement Performance Information Management System: Pavement Performance Database User Reference Guide. FHWA-RD-03–088, 2003, Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC.
6. Ferreira, C., Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. Complex Systems 13:2 (2001), 87–129.
7. Gandomi, A.H., Alavi, A.H., Mirzahosseini, M.R., et al. Nonlinear genetic-based models for prediction of flow number of asphalt mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 23:3 (2010), 248–263.
8. Hertz, J., Krogh, A., Palmer, R.G., Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation. 1991, Addison-Wesley, Boston.
9. Jiang, Y., Li, S., Gray system model for estimating the pavement international roughness index. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 19:1 (2005), 62–68.
10. Kargah-Ostadi, N., Stoffels, S.M., Tabatabaee, N., Network-level pavement roughness prediction model for rehabilitation recommendations. Transportation Research Record 2155 (2010), 124–133.
11. Koza, J.R., Genetic Programming: A Paradigm for Genetically Breeding Populations of Computer Programs to Solve Problems. STAN-CS-90-1314, 1990, Stanford University Computer Science Department Technical, Stanford.
12. Mazari, M., Niazi, Y., Modelling the effect of filler materials on performance of hot mix asphalt using genetic programming. ASCE Airfield and Highway Pavements 2015: Innovative and Cost-effective Pavements for a Sustainable Future, Miami, 2015, 2015.
13. Odoki, J.B., Kerali, H.G.R., HDM-4 Analytical Framework and Model Descriptions, Highway Development and Management. 2000, PIARC, Paris.
14. Ozbay, K., Laub, R., Models for Pavement Deterioration Using LTPD. FHWA-NJ-1999-030, 2001, Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC.
15. Perera, R.W., Byrum, C., Kohn, S.D., Investigation of Development of Pavement Roughness. FHWA-RD-97–147, 1998, Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC.
16. Rada, G.R., Perera, R., Prabhakar, V., Relating Ride Quality and Structural Adequacy for Pavement Rehabilitation/Design Decisions. FHWA-HRT-12–035, 2012, Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC.
17. Reddy, M.A., Reddy, K.S., Pandey, B.B., Selection of genetic algorithm parameters for backcalculation of pavement moduli. International Journal of Pavement Engineering 5:2 (2004), 81–90.
18. Schram, S., Abdelrahman, M., Improving prediction accuracy in mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide. Transportation Research Record 1947 (2006), 59–68.
19. Shahnazari, H., Tutunchian, M.A., Mashayekhi, M., et al. Application of soft computing for prediction of pavement condition index. Journal of Transportation Engineering 138:12 (2012), 1495–1506.
20. Stubstad, R., Carvalho, R., Briggs, R., et al. Simplified Techniques for Evaluation and Interpretation of Pavement Deflections for Network-level Analysis: Guide for Assessment of Pavement Structural Performance for PMS Applications. FHWA-HRT-12–025, 2012, Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC.
21. Sugeno, M., Industrial Applications of Fuzzy Control. 1985, Elsevier Science Pub. Co, New York.
22. Sun, L., Cai, X., Yang, J., Genetic algorithm-based optimum vehicle suspension design using minimum dynamic pavement load as a design criterion. Journal of Sound and Vibration 301:1–2 (2007), 18–27.
23. Terzi, S., Modeling for pavement roughness using the ANFIS approach. Advances in Engineering Software 57 (2013), 59–64.
24. Von Quintus, H., Killingsworth, B., Analysis Relating to Pavement Material Characterizations and Their Effects on Pavement Performance. FHWA-RD-97–05, 1997, Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC.
25. Wang, K., Li, Q., Hall, K.D., et al. Experimentation with gray theory for pavement smoothness prediction. Transportation Research Record 1990 (2007), 3–13.
26. Zadeh, L.A., Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8 (1965), 338–353.