Relating ride quality and structural adequacy for pavement rehabilitation and management decisions

Transportation Research Record

Volumn 2304, Issue , 2012, Pages 28-36

  Rada, Gonzalo R ^a   Perera, Rohan W ^b   Prabhakar, Veena C ^c   Wiser, Larry J ^d  

^a AMEC FOSTER WHEELER   (United States)

^b Soil and Materials Engineers Inc ^*  (United States)

^c Fugro Geoteam Limited   (United States)

^d Office of Research Development and Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; PAVEMENTS;

DESIGN DECISIONS; LONG-TERM PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT DECISIONS; PAVEMENT CONDITION; PAVEMENT DESIGN; PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT; PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE; PAVEMENT REHABILITATION; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; RIDE QUALITY;

BENCHMARKING;

EID: 84906074846     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: 21694052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2304-04     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Special Report 61E: The AASHO Road Test: Report 5-Pavement Research. HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1962.
2. Von Quintus, H., and B. Killingsworth. Analysis Relating to Pavement Material Characterizations and Their Effects on Pavement Performance. Publication FHWA-RD-97-05. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1997.
3. Zhang, Z., L. Manuel, I. Damnjanovic, and Z. Li. Development of a New Methodology for Characterizing Pavement Structural Condition for Network Level Applications. Report FHWA/TX-04/0-4322-1. Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas, Austin, 2003.
4. Smith, J. T., and S. L. Tighe. Assessment of Overlay Roughness in Long-Term Pavement Performance Test Sites: Canadian Case Study. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1869, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 126-135.
5. Perera, R. W., and S. D. Kohn. International Roughness Index of Asphalt Concrete Overlays: Analysis of Data from Long-Term Pavement Performance Program SPS-5 Projects. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1655, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 100-109.
6. Buch, N., K. Chatti, S. W. Haider, A. S. Pulipaka, R. W. Lyles, and D. Gilliland. Network-Level Evaluation of Specific Pavement Study-2 Experiment: Using a Long-Term Pavement Performance Database. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1947, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 3-14.
7. Chatti, K. Effect of Design and Site Factors on Long-Term Performance of Flexible Pavements in SPS-1 Experiment. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
8. Rauhut, J. B., A. Eltahan, and A. L. Simpson. Common Characteristics of Good and Poorly Performing AC Pavements. Publication FHWARD- 99-193. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1999.
9. Performance Trends of Rehabilitated AC Pavements. Technical Brief. Publication FHWA-RD-00-165. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2000.
10. What Makes Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) Pavements Rough? Technical Brief. Publication FHWA-RD-98-148. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1998.
11. Vepa, T. S., K. P. George, and A. R. Shekharan. Prediction of Pavement Remaining Life. In Transportation Research Record 1524, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 137-144.
12. Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1993.
13. Aultman-Hall, L., E. Jackson, C. E. Dougan, and S.-N. Choi. Models Relating Pavement Quality Measures. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1869, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 119-125.
14. Dewan, S. A., and R. E. Smith. Estimating International Roughness Index from Pavement Distresses to Calculate Vehicle Operating Costs for the San Francisco Bay Area. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1816, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 65-72.
15. Mactutis, J. A., S. H. Alavi, and W. C. Ott. Investigation of Relationship Between Roughness and Pavement Surface Distress Based on WesTrack Project. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1699, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 107-113.
16. Yau, J.-T., J.-D. Lin, and L.-H. Hsiao. Correlation Analysis Between International Roughness Index and Pavement Distress by Neural Network. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.
17. Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide: A Manual of Practice (interim ed.). AASHTO, Washington, D.C., July 2008.
18. Odoki, J. B., and H. G. R. Kerali. HDM-4 Analytical Framework and Model Descriptions. Highway Development and Management, HDM-4 Series of Publications. World Bank, Washington, D.C.; PIARC, Paris, France, 2000, Vol. 4.
19. Sayers, M. W., and S. M. Karamihas. The Little Book of Profiling: Basic Information About Measuring and Interpreting Road Profiles. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, 1997.
20. Karamihas, S. M., and K. A. Senn. Profile Analysis of Arizona Specific Pavement Studies 5 Project. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2095, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 144-152.
21. Karamihas, S. M., and T. D. Gillespie. Smoothness Criteria for WIM Scale Approaches. UMTRI Report 2002-37. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, 2002.
22. Sayers, M. W. Profiles of Roughness. In Transportation Research Record 1260, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 106-111.
23. Ioannides, A. M. User Manual for ILLI-BACK. 1996.