Launching PCORnet, a national patient-centered clinical research network

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 578-582

  Fleurence, Rachael L ^a   Curtis, Lesley H ^b,c   Califf, Robert M ^c   Platt, Richard ^d,e   Selby, Joe V ^a   Brown, Jeffrey S ^d,e  

^a PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DATA RESEARCH NETWORK; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MEDICAID; MEDICARE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT POWERED RESEARCH NETWORK; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP; SAMPLE SIZE;

CLINICAL DATA RESEARCH NETWORKS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; DISTRIBUTED DATABASES; PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE; PATIENT-POWERED RESEARCH NETWORKS;

COMPUTER COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84902386646     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002747     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on comparative effectiveness research prioritization. Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2009.
2. PCORI. National workshop report: advancing the use of electronic data in patient-centered outcomes research. Washington, DC: PCORI, 2013.
3. Vogt TM, Elston-Lafata J, Tolsma D, et al. The role of research in integrated healthcare systems: the HMO Research Network. Am J Manag Care 2004;10:643-8.
4. EDM Forum.Building the Electronic Clinical Data Infrastructure to Improve Patient Outcomes: CER Project Profiles. Issue Briefs and Reports: Academy Health, 2012.
5. Baggs J, Gee J, Lewis E, et al. The Vaccine Safety Datalink: a model for monitoring immunization safety. Pediatrics 2011;127(Suppl 1):S45-53.
6. Behrman RE, Benner JS, Brown JS, et al. Developing the Sentinel System-a national resource for evidence development. N Engl J Med 2011;364:498-9.
7. National Institutes of Health. NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory. 2014. https://http://www.nihcollaboratory.org/Pages/default.aspx.
8. Selby JV, Krumholz HM, Kuntz RE, et al. Network news: powering clinical research. Sci Transl Med 2013;5:182fs13.
9. The Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). The national patientcentered clinical research network: Clinical Data Research Networks (CDRN)-phase one. Washington, DC: PCORI, 2013.
10. The Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). The national patient-centered clinical research network: Patient-Powered Research Networks (PPRN)-phase one. Revised edn. Washington, DC: PCORI, 2013.
11. Brown JS, Holmes JH, Shah K, et al. Distributed health data networks: a practical and preferred approach to multi-institutional evaluations of comparative effectiveness, safety, and quality of care. Med Care 2010;48(6 Suppl): S45-51.
12. Curtis LH, Weiner MG, Boudreau DM, et al. Design considerations, architecture, and use of the Mini-Sentinel distributed data system. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2012;21(Suppl 1):23-31.
13. Brown J, Syat B, Lane K, et al. Blueprint for a distributed research network to conduct population studies and safety surveillance. Effective Health Care Research Report. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), 2010.
14. Toh S, Gagne JJ, Rassen JA, et al. Confounding adjustment in comparative effectiveness research conducted within distributed research networks. Med Care 2013;51(8 Suppl 3):S4-10.
15. Toh S, Reichman ME, Houstoun M, et al. Multivariable confounding adjustment in distributed data networks without sharing of patient-level data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2013;22:1171-7.
16. Go AS, Singer D, Cheetham TC, et al. A protocol for assessment of Dabigatran: Mini-Sentinal (US Food and Drug Administration), 2013.
17. Hersh WR, Weiner MG, Embi PJ, et al. Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research. Med Care 2013; 51(8 Suppl 3):S30-7.
18. Ogunyemi OI, Meeker D, Kim HE, et al. Identifying appropriate reference data models for comparative effectiveness research (CER) studies based on data from clinical information systems. Med Care 2013;51(8 Suppl 3):S45-52.
19. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010;363:501-4.
20. Institute of Medicine. Data harmonization for patient-centered clinical research-a workshop. 2014.
21. PCORnet. PCORnet common data model specification. Version 1.0. Washington, DC: PCORI, 2014.
22. Abernethy AP, Herndon JE II, Wheeler JL, et al. Improving health care efficiency and quality using tablet personal computers to collect research-quality, patient-reported data. Health Serv Res 2008;43:1975-91.
23. Sung NS, Crowley WF Jr, Genel M, et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA 2003;289:1278-87.
24. Trinidad SB, Fullerton SM, Ludman EJ, et al. Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf. Science 2011;331:287-8.
25. Solomon MZ, Bonham AC. Ethical oversight of research on patient care. Hastings Cent Rep 2013;S1:pp S2-3. doi:10.1002/hast.132.
26. Platt R, Kass NE, McGraw D. Ethics, regulation, and comparative effectiveness research: time for a change. JAMA 2014. Published Online First: Epub Date. doi:10. 1001/jama.2014.2144.
27. PPRN Consortium, Daughtery S, Whaba S, et al. PPRNs consortium. PCORI patient-powered research networks: building capacity for conducting patient-centered clinical outcomes research. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21:583-6.