A comparative effectiveness trial of postoperative management for lumbar spine surgery: Changing behavior through physical therapy (CBPT) study protocol

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Archer, Kristin R ^a,d   Coronado, Rogelio A ^a   Haug, Christine M ^a   Vanston, Susan W ^a   Devin, Clinton J ^a   Fonnesbeck, Christopher J ^a   Aaronson, Oran S ^a   Cheng, Joseph S ^a   Skolasky, Richard L ^b   Riley, Lee H ^b   Wegener, Stephen T ^c  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive behavioral therapy; Comparative effectiveness research; Postoperative pain; Rehabilitation; Self management; Spine surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHRONIC PAIN; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COGNITIVE THERAPY; COMMUNITY; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; DEPRESSION; DISABILITY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MULTICENTER STUDY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PILOT STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REHABILITATION CARE; SELF CARE; SPINE SURGERY; TELEPHONE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; ANALGESIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGY; SPINE FUSION; SURGERY; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COGNITIVE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MANAGEMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PILOT PROJECTS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SELF CARE; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84907737459     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-325     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. An international comparison of back surgery rates. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Loeser JD, Bush T, Waddell G, Spine 1994 19 1201 1206 10.1097/00007632-199405310-00001 8073310
2. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin BI, Spine 2005 30 1441 1445 discussion 1446-1447 10.1097/01.brs.0000166503.37969.8a 15959375
3. Trends and variations in the use of spine surgery. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006 443 139 146 10.1097/01.blo.0000198726.62514.75 16462438
4. United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR, Bronner KK, Fisher ES, Spine 2006 31 2707 2714 17077740
5. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. Martin BI, Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Turner JA, Comstock BA, Hollingworth W, Sullivan SD, JAMA 2008 299 656 664 10.1001/jama.299.6.656 18270354
6. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, An H, N Engl J Med 2008 358 794 810 10.1056/NEJMoa0707136 18287602
7. Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) before and one year after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Jansson KA, Nemeth G, Granath F, Jonsson B, Blomqvist P, J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009 91 210 216 19190056
8. Five-year outcome of surgical decompression of the lumbar spine without fusion. Mannion AF, Denzler R, Dvorak J, Grob D, Eur Spine J 2010 19 1883 1891 10.1007/s00586-010-1535-2 20680372
9. Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures. Martin BI, Mirza SK, Comstock BA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Deyo RA, Spine 2007 32 382 387 10.1097/01.brs.0000254104.55716.46 17268274
10. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Malmivaara A, Slatis P, Heliovaara M, Sainio P, Kinnunen H, Kankare J, Dalin-Hirvonen N, Seitsalo S, Herno A, Kortekangas P, Niinimäki T, Rönty H, Tallroth K, Turunen V, Knekt P, Härkänen T, Hurri H, Spine 2007 32 1 8 10.1097/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d 17202885
11. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update). Kreiner DS, Shaffer WO, Baisden JL, Gilbert TJ, Summers JT, Toton JF, Hwang SW, Mendel RC, Reitman CA, North American Spine S, Spine J 2013 13 734 743 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.059 23830297
12. A randomised controlled trial of post-operative rehabilitation after surgical decompression of the lumbar spine. Mannion AF, Denzler R, Dvorak J, Muntener M, Grob D, Eur Spine J 2007 16 1101 1117 10.1007/s00586-007-0399-6 17593405
13. ISSLS prize winner: Function After Spinal Treatment, Exercise, and Rehabilitation (FASTER): a factorial randomized trial to determine whether the functional outcome of spinal surgery can be improved. McGregor AH, Dore CJ, Morris TP, Morris S, Jamrozik K, Spine 2011 36 1711 1720 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318214e3e6 21378603
14. Postoperative rehabilitation does not improve functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up. Aalto TJ, Leinonen V, Herno A, Alen M, Kroger H, Turunen V, Savolainen S, Saari T, Airaksinen O, Eur Spine J 2011 20 1331 1340 10.1007/s00586-011-1781-y 21523459
15. Predictors of multidimensional outcome after spinal surgery. Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Dvorak J, Jacobshagen N, Semmer NK, Boos N, Eur Spine J 2007 16 777 786 10.1007/s00586-006-0255-0 17103229
16. A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery. den Boer JJ, Oostendorp RA, Beems T, Munneke M, Oerlemans M, Evers AW, Eur Spine J 2006 15 527 536 10.1007/s00586-005-0910-x 15915334
17. The effect of fear of movement beliefs on pain and disability after surgery for lumbar and cervical degenerative conditions. Archer KR, Wegener ST, Seebach C, Song Y, Skolasky RS, Thornton C, Khanna AJ, Riley LH, Spine 2011 36 1554 1562 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f8c6f4 21270700
18. Early postoperative fear of movement predicts pain, disability, and physical health 6 months after spinal surgery for degenerative conditions. Archer KR, Seebach CL, Mathis S, Riley LH, Wegener ST, Spine J 2013 14 759 767 24211099
19. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG, van Eek H, Pain 1995 62 363 372 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00279-N 8657437
20. The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Butler AC, Chapman JE, Forman EM, Beck AT, Clin Psychol Rev 2006 26 17 31 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.003 16199119
21. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache. Morley S, Eccleston C, Williams A, Pain 1999 80 1 13 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00255-3 10204712
22. The efficacy of telephone counseling for health promotion in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. Bombardier CH, Cunniffe M, Wadhwani R, Gibbons LE, Blake KD, Kraft GH, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008 89 1849 1856 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.03.021 18929012
23. Can chronic disability be prevented? A randomized trial of a cognitive-behavior intervention and two forms of information for patients with spinal pain. Linton SJ, Andersson T, Spine 2000 25 2825 2831 discussion 2824 10.1097/00007632-200011010-00017 11064530
24. Brief cognitive-behavioral treatment for TMD pain: long-term outcomes and moderators of treatment. Litt MD, Shafer DM, Kreutzer DL, Pain 2010 151 110 116 10.1016/j.pain.2010.06.030 20655662
25. Pain coping skills training for patients with elevated pain catastrophizing who are scheduled for knee arthroplasty: a quasi-experimental study. Riddle DL, Keefe FJ, Nay WT, McKee D, Attarian DE, Jensen MP, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011 92 859 865 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.003 21530943
26. A trial of an activating intervention for chronic back pain in primary care and physical therapy settings. Von Korff M, Balderson BH, Saunders K, Miglioretti DL, Lin EH, Berry S, Moore JE, Turner JA, Pain 2005 113 323 330 10.1016/j.pain.2004.11.007 15661440
27. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K, JAMA 2002 288 2469 2475 10.1001/jama.288.19.2469 12435261
28. Is adherence to pain self-management strategies associated with improved pain, depression and disability in those with disabling chronic pain? Nicholas MK, Asghari A, Corbett M, Smeets RJ, Wood BM, Overton S, Perry C, Tonkin LE, Beeston L, Eur J Pain 2012 16 93 104 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.06.005 21705246
29. Importance of the back-cafe concept to rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized clinical study with a 2-year follow-up. Christensen FB, Laurberg I, Bunger CE, Spine 2003 28 2561 2569 10.1097/01.BRS.0000097890.96524.A1 14652472
30. Early rehabilitation targeting cognition, behavior, and motor function after lumbar fusion: a randomized controlled trial. Abbott AD, Tyni-Lenne R, Hedlund R, Spine 2010 35 848 857 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d1049f 20354468
31. Cognitive-behavioral-based physical therapy to improve surgical spine outcomes: a case series. Archer KR, Motzny N, Abraham CM, Yaffe D, Seebach CL, Devin CJ, Spengler DM, McGirt MJ, Aaronson OS, Cheng JS, Wegener ST, Phys Ther 2013 93 1130 1139 10.2522/ptj.20120426 23599351
32. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG, J Biomed Inform 2009 42 377 381 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 18929686
33. Evaluating the efficacy of graded in vivo exposure for the treatment of fear in patients with chronic back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Woods MP, Asmundson GJ, Pain 2008 136 271 280 10.1016/j.pain.2007.06.037 17716819
34. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain: an overview with specific references to fear and avoidance. Williams AC, McCracken LM, Understanding and Treating Fear of Pain London: Oxford University Press, Asmundson GG, Vlaeyen JW, Crombez G, 2004 293 312
35. Brief cognitive-behavioral therapy for temporomandibular disorder pain: effects on daily electronic outcome and process measures. Turner JA, Mancl L, Aaron LA, Pain 2005 117 377 387 10.1016/j.pain.2005.06.025 16153777
36. Arthritis self-management studies: a twelve-year review. Lorig K, Holman H, Health Educ Q 1993 20 17 28 10.1177/109019819302000104 8444622
37. Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes. Lorig KR, Ritter P, Stewart AL, Sobel DS, Brown BW Jr, Bandura A, Gonzalez VM, Laurent DD, Holman HR, Med Care 2001 39 1217 1223 10.1097/00005650-200111000-00008 11606875
38. Relaxation and imagery techniques. Syrjala KL, Bonica's Management of Pain Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wlikins, Loeser JD, 2001 1255 1266
39. Bernstein DA, Borkovex TD, Hazlett-Stevens H, New Directions in Progressive Relaxation Training Westport: Praeger 2000
40. Identifying and applying psychological theory to setting and achieving rehabilitation goals. Scobbie L, Wyke S, Dixon D, Clin Rehabil 2009 23 321 333 10.1177/0269215509102981 19293291
41. Beck AT, Rush AJ, Shaw BF, Emery G, Cognitive Therapy and Depression New York, NY: Guilford press 1979
42. Problem solving and behavior modification. D'Zurilla TJ, Goldfried MR, J Abnorm Psychol 1971 78 107 126 4938262
43. A cognitive-behavioral approach to pain management. Turk DC, Okifuki AD, Textbook of Pain London: Churchill Livingstone, Wall PD, Melzack R, 1999 1431 1444
44. Psychosocial interventions for low back pain in primary care. Lessons learned from recent trials. van der Windt D, Hay E, Jellema P, Main C, Spine 2008 33 81 89 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e39f9 18165752
45. The oswestry disability index. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB, Spine 2000 25 2940 2952 discussion 2952 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017 11074683
46. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Davidson M, Keating JL, Phys Ther 2002 82 8 24 11784274
47. The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Pratt RK, Fairbank JC, Virr A, Spine 2002 27 84 91 10.1097/00007632-200201010-00020 11805642
48. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY, Spine J 2008 8 968 974 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.11.006 18201937
49. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Parker SL, Adogwa O, Paul AR, Anderson WN, Aaronson O, Cheng JS, McGirt MJ, J Neurosurg Spine 2011 14 598 604 21332281
50. Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM, Ann Acad Med Singapore 1994 23 129 138 8080219
51. Measuring outcomes in pain clinical trials: the importance of empirical support for measure selection. Jensen MP, Hu X, Potts SL, Gould EM, Clin J Pain 2014 30 744 780 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000046 24300228
52. Single vs. composite measures of pain intensity: relative sensitivity for detecting treatment effects. Jensen MP, Hu X, Potts SL, Gould EM, Pain 2013 154 534 538 10.1016/j.pain.2012.12.017 23375512
53. Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. Keller S, Bann CM, Dodd SL, Schein J, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS, Clin J Pain 2004 20 309 318 10.1097/00002508-200409000-00005 15322437
54. The utility and validity of the modified brief pain inventory in a multiple-dose postoperative analgesic trial. Mendoza TR, Chen C, Brugger A, Hubbard R, Snabes M, Palmer SN, Zhang Q, Cleeland CS, Clin J Pain 2004 20 357 362 10.1097/00002508-200409000-00011 15322443
55. Comparison of pain measures in surgical patients. Zalon ML, J Nurs Meas 1999 7 135 152 10710858
56. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD, Med Care 1996 34 220 233 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 8628042
57. A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D, Lawrence K, Petersen S, Paice C, Stradling J, J Public Health Med 1997 19 179 186 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024606 9243433
58. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey (SF-12) in patients with back pain. Luo X, George ML, Kakouras I, Edwards CL, Pietrobon R, Richardson W, Hey L, Spine 2003 28 1739 1745 12897502
59. The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. Chen KY, Bassett DR Jr, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005 37 490 S500 10.1249/01.mss.0000185571.49104.82 16294112
60. Assessment of wear/nonwear time classification algorithms for triaxial accelerometer. Choi L, Ward SC, Schnelle JF, Buchowski MS, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012 44 2009 2016 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318258cb36 22525772
61. Measuring free-living energy expenditure and physical activity with triaxial accelerometry. Plasqui G, Joosen AM, Kester AD, Goris AH, Westerterp KR, Obes Res 2005 13 1363 1369 10.1038/oby.2005.165 16129718
62. Validation of the ActiGraph two-regression model for predicting energy expenditure. Rothney MP, Brychta RJ, Meade NN, Chen KY, Buchowski MS, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010 42 1785 1792 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d5a984 20142778
63. Accelerometer use with children, older adults, and adults with functional limitations. Strath SJ, Pfeiffer KA, Whitt-Glover MC, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012 44 77 S85 22157778
64. Validity of activity monitors in health and chronic disease: a systematic review. Van Remoortel H, Giavedoni S, Raste Y, Burtin C, Louvaris Z, Gimeno-Santos E, Langer D, Glendenning A, Hopkinson NS, Vogiatzis I, Peterson BT, Wilson F, Mann B, Rabinovich R, Puhan MA, Troosters T, Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012 9 84 10.1186/1479-5868-9-84 22776399
65. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia: invariant two-factor model across low back pain patients and fibromyalgia patients. Goubert L, Crombez G, Van Damme S, Vlaeyen JW, Bijttebier P, Roelofs J, Clin J Pain 2004 20 103 110 10.1097/00002508-200403000-00007 14770050
66. Comparative study of short forms for the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia: fear of movement in a surgical spine population. Archer KR, Phelps KD, Seebach CL, Song Y, Riley LH, Wegener ST, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012 93 1460 1462 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.024 22481127
67. Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: a shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Woby SR, Roach NK, Urmston M, Watson PJ, Pain 2005 117 137 144 10.1016/j.pain.2005.05.029 16055269
68. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic pain: a psychometric assessment of the original English version of the Tampa scale for kinesiophobia (TSK). French DJ, France CR, Vigneau F, French JA, Evans RT, Pain 2007 127 42 51 10.1016/j.pain.2006.07.016 16962238
69. The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia: further examination of psychometric properties in patients with chronic low back pain and fibromyalgia. Roelofs J, Goubert L, Peters ML, Vlaeyen JW, Crombez G, Eur J Pain 2004 8 495 502 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.11.016 15324781
70. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Nicholas MK, Eur J Pain 2007 11 153 163 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.12.008 16446108
71. Measuring pain self-efficacy. Miles CL, Pincus T, Carnes D, Taylor SJ, Underwood M, Clin J Pain 2011 27 461 470 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318208c8a2 21317778
72. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, J Gen Intern Med 2001 16 606 613 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x 11556941
73. The patient health questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: a systematic review. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Lowe B, Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2010 32 345 359 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006 20633738
74. Psychologically informed practice for management of low back pain: future directions in practice and research. Main CJ, George SZ, Phys Ther 2011 91 820 824 10.2522/ptj.20110060 21451091
75. Psychologically informed interventions for low back pain: an update for physical therapists. Nicholas MK, George SZ, Phys Ther 2011 91 765 776 10.2522/ptj.20100278 21451090