Visual interestingness in image sequences

MM 2013 - Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Multimedia Conference

Volumn 2013-January, Issue , 2013, Pages 1017-1026

  Grabner, Helmut ^a,b   Nater, Fabian ^a,b   Druey, Michel ^c   Van Gool, Luc ^a,d  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b upicto GmbH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

computer vision; image understanding; visual interestingness

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER VISION;

COMPUTER VISION ALGORITHMS; HUMAN ATTENTION; IMAGE SEQUENCE; INTERESTINGNESS; LARGE REGIONS; MULTIPLE CUES; POWER; VISUAL ATTENTION; VISUAL INTERESTINGNESS; WEATHER CHANGE;

CAMERAS;

EID: 84994639152     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2502081.2502109     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. D. Berlyne. Conict, arousal, and curiosity. McGraw-Hill, 1960.
2. M. Breitenstein, H. Grabner, and L. Van Gool. Hunting nessie: Real time abnormality detection from webcams. In Proc. IEEE WS on Visual Surveillance, 2009.
3. M. Breunig, H. Kriegel, R. Ng, and J. Sander. Lof: Identifying density-based local outliers. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, 2000.
4. C. Chang and C. Lin. LIBSVM : a library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2(27):1-27, 2011.
5. A. Chen, P. Darst, and R. Pangrazi. An examination of situational interest and its sources. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71:383-400, 2001.
6. S. Dhar, V. Ordonez, and T. Berg. High level describable attributes for predicting aesthetics and interestingness. In Proc. CVPR, 2011.
7. M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. IJCV, 88:303-338, 2010.
8. J. Henderson. Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. TRENDS in Cognitive Science, 7(11):498-504, 2003.
9. P. Isola, J. Xiao, A. Torralba, and A. Oliva. What makes an image memorable? In Proc. CVPR, 2011.
10. L. Itti and P. Baldi. A principled approach to detecting surprising events in video. In Proc. CVPR, 2005.
11. L. Itti and P. Baldi. Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. Vision Research, 49:1295-1306, 2009.
12. L. Itti and C. Koch. Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(3):194-203, 2001.
13. N. Jacobs, N. Roman, and R. Pless. Consistent temporal variations in many outdoor scenes. In Proc. CVPR, 2007.
14. V. Jain and E. Learned-Miller. Online domain adaption of a pre-trained cascade of classifiers. In Proc. CVPR, 2011.
15. N. Johnson and D. Hogg. Learning the distribution of object trajectories for event recognition. In Proc. BMVC, 1995.
16. P. Lang, M. Bradley, and B. Cuthbert. International affective picture system (iaps): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical report, Technical Report A-8. University of Florida, 2008.
17. J. Machajdik and A. Hanbury. Affective image classification using features inspired by psychology and art theory. In Proc. ACM Multimedia, 2010.
18. A. Money and H. Agiu. Video summarisation: A conceptual framework and survey of the state of the art. J. Visual Communication and Image Representation, 19:121-143, 2008.
19. F. Nater, H. Grabner, and L. Van Gool. Temporal relations in videos for unsupervised activity analysis. In Proc. BMVC, 2011.
20. T. Schaul, L. Pape, T. Glasmachers, V. Graziano, and J. Schmidhuber. Coherence progress: A measure of interestingness based on fixed compressors. In In Proc. Conf. on Artificial General Intelligence, 2011.
21. J. Schmidhuber. Driven by compression progress: A simple principle explains essential aspects of subjective beauty, novelty, surprise, interestingness, attention, curiosity, creativity, art, science, music, jokes. Technical report, TU-Munich, 2009.
22. W. Schneider and R. Shiffrin. Controlled and automatic human information processing: Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84:1-66, 1977.
23. P. Silvia. Exploring the psychology of interest. Oxford University Press, 2006.
24. C. Stauffer and W. Grimson. Learning patterns of activity using real-time tracking. PAMI, 22(8):747-757, 2000.
25. A. Torralba, A. Oliva, M. Castelhano, and J. Henderson. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features on object search. Psychological Review, 113(4):766-786, 2006.
26. A. Treisman and G. Gelade. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12:97-136, 1980.
27. J. Tsotsos, L. Itti, and G. Rees. A brief and selective history of attention. In Neurobiology of Attention. Elsevier, 2005.
28. P. Valdez and A. Mehrabian. Effects of color on emotions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(4):394-409, 1994.
29. D. Weinshall, A. Zweig, H. Hermansky, S. Kombrink, F. Ohl, J. Anemuller, J. Bach, L. Van Gool, F. Nater, T. Pajdla, M. Havlena, and M. Pavel. Beyond novelty detection: Incongruent events, when general and specific classifiers disagree. PAMI, 2012.
30. W. Wundt. Grundzuge der physiologischen Psychologie. Engelmann, Leipzig, 1874.
31. H. Zhong, J. Shi, and M. Visontai. Detecting unusual activity in video. In Proc. CVPR, 2004.
32. X. Zhu, Z. Ghahramani, and J. Lafferty. Semi-supervised learning using gaussian fields and harmonic functions. In Proc. ICML, 2003.