Phase transitions and self-organized criticality in networks of stochastic spiking neurons

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Brochini, Ludmila ^a   De Andrade Costa, Ariadne ^b   Abadi, Miguel ^a   Roque, Antônio C ^a   Stolfi, Jorge ^b   Kinouchi, Osame ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AVALANCHE; AXON; DENDRITE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTUITION; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; PHASE TRANSITION; PLASTICITY; PROBABILITY; STOCHASTIC MODEL; SYNAPSE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; METABOLISM; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION;

EID: 84994565798     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep35831     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Turing, A. M. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59, 433-460 (1950).
2. Chialvo, D. R. Emergent complex neural dynamics. Nature physics 6, 744-750 (2010).
3. Hesse, J. & Gross, T. Self-organized criticality as a fundamental property of neural systems. Criticality as a signature of healthy neural systems: multi-scale experimental and computational studies (2015).
4. Kinouchi, O. & Copelli, M. Optimal dynamical range of excitable networks at criticality. Nature physics 2, 348-351 (2006).
5. Beggs, J. M. The criticality hypothesis: how local cortical networks might optimize information processing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 366, 329-343 (2008).
6. Shew, W. L., Yang, H., Petermann, T., Roy, R. & Plenz, D. Neuronal avalanches imply maximum dynamic range in cortical networks at criticality. The Journal of Neuroscience 29, 15595-15600 (2009).
7. Massobrio, P., de Arcangelis, L., Pasquale, V., Jensen, H. J. & Plenz, D. Criticality as a signature of healthy neural systems. Frontiers in systems neuroscience 9 (2015).
8. Herz, A. V. & Hopfield, J. J. Earthquake cycles and neural reverberations: collective oscillations in systems with pulse-coupled threshold elements. Physical review letters 75, 1222 (1995).
9. Beggs, J. M. & Plenz, D. Neuronal avalanches in neocortical circuits. The Journal of neuroscience 23, 11167-11177 (2003).
10. Markovic, D. & Gros, C. Power laws and self-organized criticality in theory and nature. Physics Reports 536, 41-74 (2014).
11. de Arcangelis, L., Perrone-Capano, C. & Herrmann, H. J. Self-organized criticality model for brain plasticity. Physical review letters 96, 028107 (2006).
12. Levina, A., Herrmann, J. M. & Geisel, T. Dynamical synapses causing self-organized criticality in neural networks. Nature physics 3, 857-860 (2007).
13. Bonachela, J. A., De Franciscis, S., Torres, J. J. & Munoz, M. A. Self-organization without conservation: are neuronal avalanches generically critical? Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2010, P02015 (2010).
14. De Arcangelis, L. Are dragon-king neuronal avalanches dungeons for self-organized brain activity? The European Physical Journal Special Topics 205, 243-257 (2012).
15. Costa, A., Copelli, M. & Kinouchi, O. Can dynamical synapses produce true self-organized criticality? Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2015, P06004 (2015).
16. van Kessenich, L. M., de Arcangelis, L. & Herrmann, H. Synaptic plasticity and neuronal refractory time cause scaling behaviour of neuronal avalanches. Scientific Reports 6 (2016).
17. Campos, J., Costa, A., Copelli, M. & Kinouchi, O. Differences between quenched and annealed networks with dynamical links. arXiv:1604.05779 To appear in Physical Review E (2016).
18. Ermentrout, B., Pascal, M. & Gutkin, B. The effects of spike frequency adaptation and negative feedback on the synchronization of neural oscillators. Neural Computation 13, 1285-1310 (2001).
19. Benda, J. & Herz, A. V. A universal model for spike-frequency adaptation. Neural computation 15, 2523-2564 (2003).
20. Buonocore, A., Caputo, L., Pirozzi, E. & Carfora, M. F. A leaky integrate-and-fire model with adaptation for the generation of a spike train. Mathematical biosciences and engineering: MBE 13, 483-493 (2016).
21. Galves, A. & Löcherbach, E. Infinite systems of interacting chains with memory of variable length - stochastic model for biological neural nets. Journal of Statistical Physics 151, 896-921 (2013).
22. Lapicque, L. Recherches quantitatives sur l'excitation électrique des nerfs traitée comme une polarisation. J. Physiol. Pathol. Gen. 9, 620-635 (1907).
23. Translation: Brunel, N. & van Rossum, M. C. Quantitative investigations of electrical nerve excitation treated as polarization. Biol. Cybernetics 97, 341-349 (2007).
24. Gerstein, G. L. & Mandelbrot, B. Random walk models for the spike activity of a single neuron. Biophysical journal 4, 41 (1964).
25. Burkitt, A. N. A review of the integrate-and-fire neuron model: I. homogeneous synaptic input. Biological cybernetics 95, 1-19 (2006).
26. Burkitt, A. N. A review of the integrate-and-fire neuron model: II. inhomogeneous synaptic input and network properties. Biological cybernetics 95, 97-112 (2006).
27. Naud, R. & Gerstner, W. The performance (and limits) of simple neuron models: generalizations of the leaky integrate-and-fire model. In Computational Systems Neurobiology 163-192 (Springer, 2012).
28. Brette, R. et al. Simulation of networks of spiking neurons: a review of tools and strategies. Journal of computational neuroscience 23, 349-398 (2007).
29. Brette, R. What is the most realistic single-compartment model of spike initiation? PLoS Comput Biol 11, e1004114 (2015).
30. Benayoun, M., Cowan, J. D., van Drongelen, W. & Wallace, E. Avalanches in a stochastic model of spiking neurons. PLoS Comput Biol 6, e1000846 (2010).
31. Ostojic, S. Two types of asynchronous activity in networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons. Nature neuroscience 17, 594-600 (2014).
32. Torres, J. J. & Marro, J. Brain performance versus phase transitions. Scientific reports 5 (2015).
33. Platkiewicz, J. & Brette, R. A threshold equation for action potential initiation. PLoS Comput Biol 6, e1000850 (2010).
34. McDonnell, M. D., Goldwyn, J. H. & Lindner, B. Editorial: Neuronal stochastic variability: Influences on spiking dynamics and network activity. Frontiers in computational neuroscience 10 (2016).
35. Soula, H., Beslon, G. & Mazet, O. Spontaneous dynamics of asymmetric random recurrent spiking neural networks. Neural Computation 18, 60-79 (2006).
36. Cessac, B. A discrete time neural network model with spiking neurons. Journal of Mathematical Biology 56, 311-345 (2008).
37. Cessac, B. A view of neural networks as dynamical systems. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 20, 1585-1629 (2010).
38. Cessac, B. A discrete time neural network model with spiking neurons: Ii: Dynamics with noise. Journal of mathematical biology 62, 863-900 (2011).
39. De Masi, A., Galves, A., Löcherbach, E. & Presutti, E. Hydrodynamic limit for interacting neurons. Journal of Statistical Physics 158, 866-902 (2015).
40. Duarte, A. & Ost, G. A model for neural activity in the absence of external stimuli. Markov Processes and Related Fields 22, 37-52 (2016).
41. Duarte, A., Ost, G. & Rodrguez, A. A. Hydrodynamic limit for spatially structured interacting neurons. Journal of Statistical Physics 161, 1163-1202 (2015).
42. Galves, A. & Löcherbach, E. Modeling networks of spiking neurons as interacting processes with memory of variable length. J. Soc. Franc. Stat. 157, 17-32 (2016).
43. Larremore, D. B., Shew, W. L., Ott, E., Sorrentino, F. & Restrepo, J. G. Inhibition causes ceaseless dynamics in networks of excitable nodes. Physical review letters 112, 138103 (2014).
44. Virkar, Y. S., Shew, W. L., Restrepo, J. G. & Ott, E. Metabolite transport through glial networks stabilizes the dynamics of learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.03090 (2016).
45. Cooper, S. J. Donald o. hebb's synapse and learning rule: a history and commentary. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 28, 851-874 (2005).
46. Tsodyks, M., Pawelzik, K. & Markram, H. Neural networks with dynamic synapses. Neural computation 10, 821-835 (1998).
47. Larremore, D. B., Shew, W. L. & Restrepo, J. G. Predicting criticality and dynamic range in complex networks: effects of topology. Physical review letters 106, 058101 (2011).
48. Kole, M. H. & Stuart, G. J. Signal processing in the axon initial segment. Neuron 73, 235-247 (2012).
49. Lipetz, L. E. The relation of physiological and psychological aspects of sensory intensity. In Principles of Receptor Physiology, 191-225 (Springer, 1971).
50. Naka, K.-I. & Rushton, W. A. S-potentials from luminosity units in the retina of fish (cyprinidae). The Journal of physiology 185, 587 (1966).
51. Bonachela, J. A. & Munoz, M. A. Self-organization without conservation: true or just apparent scale-invariance? Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2009, P09009 (2009).
52. Priesemann, V., Munk, M. H. & Wibral, M. Subsampling effects in neuronal avalanche distributions recorded in vivo. BMC neuroscience 10, 40 (2009).
53. Ribeiro, T. L. et al. Spike avalanches exhibit universal dynamics across the sleep-wake cycle. PloS one 5, e14129 (2010).
54. Ribeiro, T. L., Ribeiro, S., Belchior, H., Caixeta, F. & Copelli, M. Undersampled critical branching processes on small-world and random networks fail to reproduce the statistics of spike avalanches. PloS one 9, e94992 (2014).