What Do Patients Tweet About Their Mammography Experience?

Academic Radiology

Volumn 23, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 1367-1371

  Rosenkrantz, Andrew B ^a   Labib, Anthony ^a   Pysarenko, Kristine ^a   Prabhu, Vinay ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

breast cancer; Mammography; patient experience; social media

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST COMPRESSION; BREAST EXAMINATION; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL STAFF; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCREENING TEST; SOCIAL MEDIA; ANXIETY; FEAR; FEMALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

ANXIETY; FEAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 84994082519     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. 1 Feig, S.A., Screening mammography benefit controversies: sorting the evidence. Radiol Clin North Am 52 (2014), 455–480.
2. 2 Loberg, M., Lousdal, M.L., Bretthauer, M., et al. Benefits and harms of mammography screening. Breast Cancer Res, 17, 2015, 63.
3. 3 Oeffinger, K.C., Fontham, E.T., Etzioni, R., et al. Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. JAMA 314 (2015), 1599–1614.
4. 4 Jiang, M., Hughes, D.R., Appleton, C.M., et al. Recent trends in adherence to continuous screening for breast cancer among Medicare beneficiaries. Prev Med 73 (2015), 47–52.
5. 5 Dehkordy, S.F., Hall, K.S., Roach, A.L., et al. Trends in breast cancer screening: impact of U.S. preventive services task force recommendations. Am J Prev Med 49 (2015), 419–422.
6. 6 Whelehan, P., Evans, A., Wells, M., et al. The effect of mammography pain on repeat participation in breast cancer screening: a systematic review. Breast 22 (2013), 389–394.
7. 7 Miller, S.J., O'Hea, E.L., Lerner, J.B., et al. The relationship between breast cancer anxiety and mammography: experiential avoidance as a moderator. Behav Med 37 (2011), 113–118.
8. 8 Madadi, M., Zhang, S., Yeary, K.H., et al. Analyzing factors associated with women's attitudes and behaviors toward screening mammography using design-based logistic regression. Breast Cancer Res Treat 144 (2014), 193–204.
9. 9 Tan, A.S., Moldovan-Johnson, M., Gray, S.W., et al. An analysis of the association between cancer-related information seeking and adherence to breast cancer surveillance procedures. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 22 (2013), 167–174.
10. 10 InternetLiveStats.com, Twitter Usage Statistics. Available at: http://www.internetlivestats.com/twitter-statistics/ Accessed 16, 2016.
11. 11 Attai, D.J., Cowher, M.S., Al-Hamadani, M., et al. Twitter social media is an effective tool for breast cancer patient education and support: patient-reported outcomes by survey. J Med Internet Res, 17, 2015, e188.
12. 12 Prabhu, V., Lee, T., Loeb, S., et al. Twitter response to the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against screening with prostate-specific antigen. BJU Int 116 (2015), 65–71.
13. 13 Hewis, J., Do MRI patients tweet? Thematic analysis of patient tweets about their MRI experience. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 46 (2015), 396–402.
14. 14 Dewey, M., Schink, T., Dewey, C.F., Claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: cohort study in over 55,000 patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 26 (2007), 1322–1327.
15. 15 Symplur, L.L.C., Symplur. Available at: www.symplur.com Accessed May 2, 2016.
16. 16 Prabhu, V., Rosenkrantz, A.B., Imbalance of opinions expressed on Twitter relating to CT radiation risk: an opportunity for increased radiologist representation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204 (2015), W48–W51.
17. 17 Prabhu, V., Rosenkrantz, A.B., Enriched Audience Engagement Through Twitter: Should More Academic Radiology Departments Seize the Opportunity?. J Am Coll Radiol 12 (2015), 756–759.
18. 18 Bairati, I., Turcotte, S., Doray, G., et al. Development and validation of an instrument assessing women's satisfaction with screening mammography in an organized breast cancer screening program. BMC Health Serv Res, 14, 2014, 9.
19. 19 Drossaert, C.H., Boer, H., Seydel, E.R., Does mammographic screening and a negative result affect attitudes towards future breast screening?. J Med Screen 8 (2001), 204–212.
20. 20 Rosenkrantz, A.B., Pysarenko, K., The service encounter in radiology: acing the “moments of truth” to achieve patient-centered care. Acad Radiol 22 (2015), 259–264.
21. 21 Almog, R., Hagoel, L., Tamir, A., et al. Quality control in a National Program for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer: women's satisfaction with the mammography process. Womens Health Issues 18 (2008), 110–117.
22. 22 Elwood, M., McNoe, B., Smith, T., et al. Once is enough–why some women do not continue to participate in a breast cancer screening programme. N Z Med J 111 (1998), 180–183.
23. 23 Drossaert, C.H., Boer, H., Seydel, E.R., Monitoring women's experiences during three rounds of breast cancer screening: results from a longitudinal study. J Med Screen 9 (2002), 168–175.
24. 24 Bakker, D.A., Lightfoot, N.E., Steggles, S., et al. The experience and satisfaction of women attending breast cancer screening. Oncol Nurs Forum 25 (1998), 115–121.
25. 25 Laranjo, L., Arguel, A., Neves, A.L., et al. The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 22 (2015), 243–256.
26. 26 Birnbaum, M.L., Candan, K., Libby, I., et al. Impact of online resources and social media on help-seeking behaviour in youth with psychotic symptoms. Early Interv Psychiatry, 2014, 10.1111/eip.12179.
27. 27 Mylod, D., Breast feeding a sick child; can social media influence practice?. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs 38 (2015), 77–84.
28. 28 Kim, A.E., Hansen, H.M., Murphy, J., et al. Methodological considerations in analyzing Twitter data. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2013 (2013), 140–146.