An Analysis of the Association between Cancer-Related Information Seeking and Adherence to Breast Cancer Surveillance Procedures

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 167-174

  Tan, Andy S L ^a   Moldovan Johnson, Mihaela ^c   Gray, Stacy W ^d   Hornik, Robert C ^a   Armstrong, Katrina ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services   (United States)

^d DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST SELF EXAMINATION; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER PATIENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFORMATION SEEKING; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BREAST NEOPLASMS; BREAST SELF-EXAMINATION; COHORT STUDIES; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PENNSYLVANIA; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVORS;

EID: 84872158105     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0781     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2007. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2010. Report No.: 2011.
2. Grunfeld E, Noorani H,McGahan L, Paszat L, Coyle D, van Walraven C, et al. Surveillance mammography after treatment of primary breast cancer: a systematic review. The Breast 2002;11:228-35.
3. Mellink WA, Holland R, Hendriks JH, Peeters PH, Rutgers EJ, van Daal WA. The contribution of routine follow-up mammography to an early detection of asynchronous contralateral breast cancer. Cancer 1991;67:1844-8.
4. Senofsky GM, Wanebo HJ, Wilhelm MC, Pope TL Jr, Fechner RE, Broaddus W, et al. Has monitoring of the contralateral breast improved the prognosis in patients treated for primary breast cancer? Cancer 1986;57:597-602.
5. Houssami N, Abraham LA, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Kerlikowske K, Buist DS, et al. Accuracy and outcomes of screening mammography in women with a personal history of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA 2011;305:790-9.
6. de Bock GH, Bonnema J, van Der Hage J, Kievit J, van de Velde CJH. Effectiveness of routine visits and routine tests in detecting isolated locoregional recurrences after treatment for early-stage invasive breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:4010-8.
7. Lash TL, Fox MP, Buist DSM, Wei F, Field TS, Frost FJ, et al. Mammography surveillance and mortality in older breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:3001-6.
8. Schootman M, Jeffe D, Lian M, Aft R, Gillanders W. Surveillance mammography and the risk of death among elderly breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008;111:489-96.
9. Lu WL, Jansen L, Post WJ, Bonnema J, Van de Velde JC, De Bock GH. Impact on survival of early detection of isolated breast recurrences after the primary treatment for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;114:403-12.
10. Smith TJ, Davidson NE, Schapira DV, Grunfeld E, Muss HB, Vogel VG, et al. American society of clinical oncology 1998 update of recommended breast cancer surveillance guidelines. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1080-2.
11. Khatcheressian JL, Wolff AC, Smith TJ, Grunfeld E, Muss HB, Vogel VG, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:5091-7.
12. Sunga AY, Eberl MM, Oeffinger KC, Hudson MM, Mahoney MC. Care of cancer survivors. Am Fam Physician 2005;71:699-706.
13. Institute of Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI). Health care guideline: Breast cancer treatment. 8th edition. Institute of Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); 2005.
14. National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia). Clinical practice guidelines for the management of early breast cancer: Second edition. 2001.
15. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Cancer practice guidelines in oncology: Breast cancer v.1.2005. 2005.
16. Pestalozzi BC, Luporsi-Gely E, Jost LM, Bergh J. ESMO minimum clinical recommendations for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up of primary breast cancer. Annals Oncol 2005;16 suppl 1:i7-9.
17. Mauriac L, Luporsi E, Cutuli B, Fourquet A, Garbay JR, Giard S, et al. Summary version of the standards, options and recommendations for nonmetastatic breast cancer (updated January 2001). Br J Cancer 2003;89 suppl 1:S17-31.
18. Grunfeld E, Dhesy-Thind S, Levine Mfor The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: follow-up after treatment for breast cancer (summary of the 2005 update). Canadian Med Association J 2005;172:1319-20.
19. Doubeni CA, Field TS, Ulcickas Yood M, Rolnick SJ, Quessenberry CP, Fouayzi H, et al. Patterns and predictors of mammography utilization among breast cancer survivors. Cancer 2006;106:2482-8.
20. Keating NL, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E, Winer EP, Ayanian JZ. Factors related to underuse of surveillance mammography among breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:85-94.
21. Mandelblatt JS, Lawrence WF, Cullen J, Stanton AL, Krupnick JL, Kwan L, et al. Patterns of care in early-stage breast cancer survivors in the first year after cessation of active treatment. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:77-84.
22. Trask PC, Pahl L, Begeman M. Breast self-examination in long-term breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2008;2:243-52.
23. Lash TL, Silliman RA. Medical surveillance after breast cancer diagnosis. Med Care 2001;39:945-55.
24. Breslau E, Jeffery D, Davis W, Moser R, McNeel T, Hawley S. Cancer screening practices among racially and ethnically diverse breast cancer survivors: results from the 2001 and 2003 California health interview survey. J Cancer Survivorship 2010;4:1-14.
25. Keating NL, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E, Winer EP, Ayanian JZ. Surveillance testing among survivors of early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:1074-81.
26. Carcaise-Edinboro P, Bradley C, Dahman B. Surveillance mammography for Medicaid/Medicare breast cancer patients. J Cancer Survivorship 2010;4:59-66.
27. Rutten LJ, Arora NK, Bakos AD, Aziz N, Rowland J. Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980-2003). Patient Educ Couns 2005;57:250-61.
28. Beckjord E, Arora N, McLaughlin W, Oakley-Girvan I, Hamilton A, Hesse B. Health-related information needs in a large and diverse sample of adult cancer survivors: implications for cancer care. J Cancer Survivorship 2008;2:179-89.
29. Luker KA, Beaver K, Lemster SJ, Owens RG. Information needs and sources of information for women with breast cancer: a follow-up study. J Adv Nurs 1996;23:487-95.
30. Gray SW, Armstrong K, Demichele A, Schwartz JS, Hornik RC. Colon cancer patient information seeking and the adoption of targeted therapy for on-label and off-label indications. Cancer 2009;115:1424-34.
31. Martinez LS, Schwartz JS, Freres D, Fraze T, Hornik RC. Patient-clinician information engagement increases treatment decision satisfaction among cancer patients through feeling of being informed. Patient Educ Couns 2009;77:384-90.
32. Tan ASL, Bourgoin A, Gray SW, Armstrong K, Hornik RC. How does patient-clinician information engagement influence self-reported cancer-related problems? Cancer 2011;117:2569-76.
33. Lewis N, Martinez LS, Freres DR, Schwartz JS, Armstrong K, Gray SW, et al. Seeking cancer-related information from media and family/friends increases fruit and vegetable consumption among cancer patients. Health Commun 2012;27:380-8.
34. Tan AS, Mello S, Hornik RC. A longitudinal study on engagement with dieting information as a predictor of dieting behavior among adults diagnosed with cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2012;88:305-10.
35. Mello S, Tan ASL, Armstrong K, Schwartz JS, Hornik RC. Anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: the role of engagement with sources of emotional support information. Health Commun 2012;July 18:[Epub ahead of print].
36. Smith-McLallen A, Fishbein M, Hornik RC. Psychosocial determinants of cancer-related information seeking among cancer patients. J Health Commun 2011;16:212-25.
37. The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. AAPOR; 2006.
38. Nagler RH, Romantan A, Kelly BJ, Stevens RS, Gray SW, Hull SJ, et al. How do cancer patients navigate the public information environment? Understanding patterns and motivations for movement among information sources. J Cancer Educ 2010;25:360-70.
39. Dillman DA, Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley; 2000.
40. Nagler RH, Gray SW, Romantan A, Kelly BJ, DeMichele A, Armstrong K, et al. Differences in information seeking among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients: results from a population-based survey. Patient Educ Couns 2010;81 suppl: S54-62.
41. Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK, Jepson C, Brody D, Boyce A. Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. Health Psychol 1991;10:259-67.
42. Greene FLAmerican Joint Committee on Cancer, American Cancer Society. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002.
43. StataCorp. Stata: Release 12. statistical software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2011.
44. Kelly BJ, Fraze TK, Hornik RC. Response rates to a mailed survey of a representative sample of cancer patients randomly drawn from the Pennsylvania cancer registry: a randomized trial of incentive and length effects. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010;10:65.
45. StataCorp. Stata: Release 11. statistical software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2009.
46. Newman DA. Longitudinal modeling with randomly and systematically missing data: a simulation of ad hoc, maximum likelihood, and multiple imputation techniques. Organizational Research Methods 2003;6:328-62.
47. Fredette LS. Breast cancer survivors: concerns and coping. Can Nursing 1995;18:35-46.
48. Rees CE, Bath PA. Information-seeking behaviors of women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 2001;28:899-907.
49. Lewis N, Martinez LS, Freres D, Schwartz JS, Armstrong K, Gray SW, et al. Information seeking from media and family and friends increases fruit and vegetable consumption among cancer patients. Health Commun 2012;27:380-8.
50. DiMatteo MR, Robinson JD, Heritage J, Tabbarah M, Fox SA. Correspondence among patients' self-reports, chart records, and audio/videotapes of medical visits. Health Commun 2003;15:393-413.
51. Caplan LS, Mandelson MT, Anderson LA. Validity of self-reported mammography: examining recall and covariates among older women in a health maintenance organization. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:267-72.
52. Caplan LS, McQueen DV, Qualters JR, Leff M, Garrett C, Calonge N. Validity of women's self-reports of cancer screening test utilization in a managed care population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevention 2003;12:1182-7.