Efficacy of a virtual reality commercial gaming device in upper limb recovery after stroke: A randomized, controlled study

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 333-340

  Kong, Keng He ^a   Loh, Yong Joo ^a   Thia, Ernest ^a   Chai, Audrey ^a   Ng, Chwee Yin ^a   Soh, Yan Ming ^a   Toh, Shirlene ^a   Tjan, Soon Yin ^a  

^a TAN TOCK SENG HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Rehabilitation; Stroke; Upper limb; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ACTION RESEARCH ARM TEST; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUGL MEYER ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; HUMAN; LUNG EDEMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NINTENDO WII; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REHABILITATION CENTER; REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STROKE IMPACT SCALE; STROKE PATIENT; THERAPY EFFECT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIRTUAL REALITY; AGED; KINESIOTHERAPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE REHABILITATION; UPPER LIMB; VIDEO GAME;

AGED; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION; UPPER EXTREMITY; VIDEO GAMES; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 84993971924     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: 19455119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1139796     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Kwakkel G, Boudewin J, Kollen BJ, Krebs HL. Effects of robotassisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:111–121.
2. Broeks JG, Lankhorst, GJ, Rumping, K, Prevo AJ. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: Results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21:357–364.
3. Barreca S, Wolf SL, Fasoli S, Bohannon R. Treatment Interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: A critical review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17:220–226.
4. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke. JAMA. 2006;296:2095–2104.
5. Maclean N, Pound P. A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the literature on physical rehabilitation. Soc Sci Med. 2000. Feb;50(4):495–506.
6. Ku J, Mraz R, Baker N, et al. A data glove with tactile feedback for FMRI of virtual reality experiments. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005;8:187–211.
7. Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: Review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2003;6:497–508.
8. Rand D, Givon N, Weingarden H, Nota A, Zeilig G. Eliciting upper extremity purposeful movements using video games: A comparison with traditional therapy for stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28(8):733–739.
9. You SH, Jang SH, Kim YH, et al. Virtual reality-induced cortical reorganization and associated locomotor recovery in chronic stroke: An experimenter-blind randomized study. Stroke. 2005;36:1166–1171.
10. Jang SH, You SH, Hallett M, et al. Cortical reorganization and associated functional motor recovery after virtual reality in patients with chronic stroke: An experimenter blind preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:2218–2223.
11. Lohse KR, Hilderman CG, Cheung KL, Tatla S, Van der Loos HF. Virtual reality therapy for adults post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring virtual environments and commercial games in therapy. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e93318. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093318.
12. Lavere KE, George S, Thomas S, Deutch JE, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Feb 12;2:CD008349. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub3.
13. Yavuzer G, Senel A, Atay MB, Stam HJ. “Playstation EyeToy games” improve upper extremity-related motor functioning in subacute stroke: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44:237–244.
14. Saposnik G, Teasell R, Mamdani M, et al. Effectiveness of Virtual reality using wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation: A pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle. Stroke. 2010;41:1477–1484.
15. Sin H, Lee G. Additional virtual reality training using xbox kinect in stroke survivors with hemiplegia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92:871–880.
16. Horn SD, DeJong G, Smout RJ, Gassaway J, James R, Conroy B. Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: Is earlier and more aggressive therapy better? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(12):101–114.
17. Maulden SA, Gassaway J, Horn SD, Smout RJ, DeJong G. Timing of initiation of rehabilitation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:34–40.
18. Teasell R, Bitensky J, Salter K, Bayona NA. The role of timing and intensity of rehabilitation therapies. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005;12:46–57.
19. Krakauer JW, Carmichael ST, Corbett D, Wittenberg GF. Getting neurorehabilitation right: What can be learned from animal models? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:923–931.
20. Loh YJ, Tjan SY, Xu D, et al. A feasibility study using interactive commercial off-the-shelf computer gaming in upper limb rehabilitation in patients after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:437–441.
21. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:1181–1188.
22. Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864–870.
23. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31.
24. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4:483–492.
25. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2. 0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30:2131–2140.
26. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: A new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6–18.
27. Langley GB, Sheppeard H. The visual analogue scale: Its use in pain measurement. Rheumatol Int. 1985;5(4):145–148.
28. National Stroke Foundation. National stroke audit rehabilitation services report. 2012. http://strokefoundation.com.au/site/media/NSF_Audit-Report_2012_web2.pdf.
29. Sunderland A, Tinson D, Bradley E, Fletcher D, Langton-Hewer R, Wade D. Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55:530–535.
30. Lincoln N, Parry R, Vass C. Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke. 1999;30:573–579.
31. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:741–754.
32. Kreisel SH, Hennerici MG, Bazne H. Pathophysiology of stroke rehabilitation: The natural course of clinical recovery, use-dependent plasticity and rehabilitative outcome. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23:243–255.
33. Buma F, Kwakkel G, Ramsey N. Understanding upper limb recovery after stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013;31:707–722.
34. Karaahmet OZ, Eksioglu E, Gurcay E, et al. Hemiplegic shoulder pain: Associated factors and rehabilitation outcomes of hemiplegic patients with and without shoulder pain. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014;21(3):237–245.
35. Paci M, Nannetti L, Taiti P, Baccini M, Pasquini Jacopo. Shoulder subluxation fter stroke: Relationships with pain and motor recovery. Physiother Res Int. 2007;12(2):95–104.