Family and medical leave act: Unresolved issues

New Solutions

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 353-384

  Pyle, Jean L ^a   Pelletier, Marianne S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993691471     PISSN: 10482911     EISSN: 15413772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/7k3g-mw4m-6j7x-u4ev     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Francine D. Blau, Marianne A. Ferber, and Anne E. Winkler, The Economics of Women, Men, and Work, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2002.
2. U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), The Family and Medical Leave Act, 2003.
3. AFL-CIO, Family and Medical Leave, 2003.
4. David Cantor, Jane Waldfogel, Jeffrey Kerwin, Mareena McKinley Wright, Kerry Levin, John Rauch, Tracey Hagerty, and Martha Stapleton Kudela, Balancing the Needs of Families and Employers: The Family and Medical Leave Surveys 2000 Update, Westat, Rockville, MD, 2001.
5. U. S. DOL, Fact Sheet No. 028, Employment Standards Administration Wage and Hour Division, 2003.
6. Irene Padavic and Barbara Reskin, Women and Men at Work, Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, California, 2002.
7. Anita U. Hattiangadi, Paid Family Leave: At What Cost?, Washington D.C.: Employment Policy Foundation, Summary entitled Bringing Up Baby: In Fact and Fallacy, available at 2000.
8. Christopher Ruhm, Policy Watch: The Family and Medical Leave Act, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11: 3, pp. 175-186, 1997.
9. Anya Bernstein, The Moderation Dilemma: Legislative Coalitions and the Politics of Family and Medical Leave, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 2001.
10. Erin Kelly and Frank Dobbin, Civil Rights Law at Work: Sex Discrimination and the Rise of Maternity Leave Policies, American Journal of Sociology, 105: 2, pp. 455-492, September, 1999.
11. Ronald D. Elving, Conflict & Compromise, Simon & Schuster, New York, 1995.
12. California Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Guerra, 479 U.S. 272, 1987.
13. Michelle Rose Marks, Party Politics and Family Policy: The Case of the Family and Medical Leave Act, Journal of Family Issues, 18: 1, pp. 55-70, January, 1997.
14. Sonja Klueck Elison, Policy Innovation in a Cold Climate: The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, Journal of Family Issues, 18: 1, pp. 30-54, January, 1997.
15. Jane Waldfogel, Family Leave Coverage in the 1990s, Monthly Labor Review, 122: 10, pp. 13-21, October, 1999.
16. Jane Waldfogel, Family and Medical Leave: Evidence from the 2000 Surveys, Monthly Labor Review, 124: 9, pp. 17-23, September, 2001.
17. Commission on Family and Medical Leave, A Workable Balance: Report to Congress on Family and Medical Leave Policies, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC, 1996.
18. Blanche Grosswald and Andrew Scharlach, Employee Experiences with Family and Medical Leave: A Case Study, Community, Work & Family, 2: 2, pp. 187-203, 1999.
19. AFL-CIO, New Study by AFL-CIO Shows Young Workers are Facing the Future with High Hopes-But Little Trust in Today’s Employers, 1999.
20. Anita H. Weiss, Elisa J. Gordon, and Mary E. O’Connor, Parental Leave: Comparing Children’s Hospitals with Fortune 500 Companies, Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 152, pp. 629-633, July, 1998
21. U.S. DOL Bureau of Labor Statistics, Tables. February 2, 2003.
22. Naomi Gerstel and Katherine McGonagle, Job Leaves and The Limits of the Family and Medical Leave Act: The Effects of Gender, Race, and Family, Work & Occupations, 26, pp. 510-535, November, 1999.
23. Michele I. Naples, Family Leave for Low-Income Working Women: Providing Paid Leave through Temporary Disability Insurance-The New Jersey Case, IWPR Publication #A128, 2001.
24. John F. Sandberg and Sandra L. Hofferth, Changes in Children’s Time With Parents: United States, 1981-1997, Demography, 38: 3, pp. 423-436, August, 2001.
25. U.S. DOL, Families and Employers in a Changing Economy, Executive Summary, 2003.
26. Jody Heymann, The Widening Gap: Why America’s Working Families are in Jeopardy and What Can Be Done About It, Basic Books, New York, 2000.
27. Richard K. Caputo, Race and Marital History as Correlates of Women’s Access to Family-Friendly Employee Benefits, Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 24: 4, pp. 365-385, 2000.
28. Wendy Chavkin, What’s A Mother to Do? Welfare, Work, and Family, American Journal of Public Health, 89, pp 477-479, April, 1999.
29. California Labor Federation AFL-CIO, Paid Family Leave, July 29, 2002.
30. Gregg Jones, LA Times, September 23, 2002.
31. Lawrence Mishel, Jared Bernstein, and Heather Boushey, The State of Working America 2002-03, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 2003.
32. Families and Work Institute, 1998 Business Work-Life Study, Executive Summary, 2003.
33. National Partnership for Women & Families, State Family Leave Benefit Initiatives in the 2001-2002 State Legislatures: Making Family Leave More Affordable, 2002.
34. Marilyn Watkins, Family Leave Insurance Activity across the Country, Economic Opportunity Institute, 2002.
35. Tammy D. Allen, David E. L. Herst, Carly S. Bruck and Martha Sutton, Consequences Associated With Work-to-Family Conflict: A Review and Agenda for Future Research, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5: 2, pp. 278-308, 2000.
36. Jane Waldfogel, Hoshio Higuchi, and Masahiro Abe, Family Leave Policies and Women’s Retention after Childbirth: Evidence from the United States, Britain, and Japan, Journal of Population Economics, 12, pp. 523-545, 1999.
37. Diane Lewis, Leave Law on Brink of Change: Groups Propose to Change the Scope of the FMLA, Boston Globe, February 9, 2003.
38. Anne Gearan, Supreme Court Upholds State Employee Right to Family Leave, Boston Globe, May 27, 2003.
39. AFL-CIO, Ask a Working Woman Survey 2002, 2002.
40. National Partnership for Women & Families, Family Matters: A National Survey of Women and Men, 1998.
41. U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), Birth and Adoption Unemployment Compensation, Proposed Rule, Federal Register, 64: 232, December 3, 1999.
42. Randy Albelda and Tiffany Manuel, Filling the Work and Family Gap: Paid Parental Leave in Massachusetts, Labor Resource Center, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, 2000.
43. Elizabeth Sherman, Gender Politics in Massachusetts: Progress for Paid Family Leave, New England Journal of Public Policy, pp. 59-80, Fall/Winter, 2001.
44. Employment Policy Foundation, Paid Parental Leave: A $14 Billion to $128 Billion Entitlement, In Economic Bytes, September 10, 1999.
45. Anita U. Hattiangadi, Paid Family Leave Proposal Puts Unemployed in Jeopardy, In Cost Study. 2000.
46. Employment Policy Foundation, Using UI to Fund Parental Leave Could Have Unintended Adverse Consequences, In Economic Bytes, June 16, 1999.
47. Massachusetts Executive Summary, Parental Leave Benefits for Massachusetts Workers, Policy Brief Series, Number 9, August, 2001.
48. Administration Seeks Repeal of Family Leave Pay, New York Times, December 3, 2002.
49. Congressional Record-Senate, S.3141, October 17, 2002.
50. National Partnership for Women & Families, Expanding the Family and Medical Leave Act to Cover Businesses With 25-49 Employees: The Impact in the U.S. and In Each State. (year not specified).