Party politics and family policy: The case of the Family and Medical Leave Act

Journal of Family Issues

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 55-70

  Marks, Michelle Rose ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031284954     PISSN: 0192513X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/019251397018001004     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Bacchi, C. L. (1990). Same difference: Feminism and sexual difference. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
2. Ball, K. (1993, February 6). Is D.C. gridlock gone? Akron Beacon Journal, p. A2.
3. Bernstein, A. (1986, October 6). Business starts tailoring itself to suit working women. Business Week, pp. 12-14.
4. Bookman, A. (1991). Parenting without poverty: The case for funded parental leave. In J. S. Hyde & M. J. Essex (Eds.), Parental leave and child care: Setting a research and policy agenda (pp. 66-89). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
5. Brown, N. (1992, November 7). Voters looking for change turn to new generation. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 50, 3545-3547.
6. Burridge, M. (1987). Statement submitted on behalf of Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc. to House Committee on Education and Labor on Feb. 25, 1987 in course of subcommittee hearings on H.R. 925, "The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1987" (Serial No. 100-20, pp. 159-162). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
7. Bush vetoes family leave. (1992, September 25). Cleveland Plain Dealer, p. 1-A.
8. Butler, B., & Wasserman, J. (1988). Parental leave: Attitudes and practices in small businesses. In E. Zigler & M. Frank (Eds.), Parental leave crisis: Toward a national policy (pp. 223-232). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9. Callers tell president of family leave troubles. (1993, January 30). Akron Beacon Journal, p. 1A.
10. Clinton jumps on leave bill. (1992, September 18). Cleveland Plain Dealer, p. 3-A.
11. Clymer, A. (1992a, September 11). House passes family leave in face of Bush veto threat New York Times, p. A10.
12. Clymer, A. (1992b, October 1). House votes to sustain president's veto of the family-leave bill. New York Times, p. A13.
13. Congressional Quarterly Almanac (Volume XLIII). (1987). Washington: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
14. Congressional Quarterly Almanac (Volume XLV). (1989). Washington: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
15. Congressional Quarterly Inc. (1993). Key votes: Veto cloud looms over 1992 floor fights. Congressional Roll Call 1992: A Chronology and analysis of votes in the House and Senate, 102nd Cong., 2d Sess. Washington, DC: Author.
16. Connell, C. (1992, September 16). Bush plan for family leave is tax credit. Akron Beacon Journal, p. A6.
17. Cook, R. (1992, November 7). Clinton picks the GOP lock on the electoral college. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 50, 3548-3553.
18. Coontz, S. (1996, May-June). Where are the good old days? Modern Maturity, 39, 36-43.
19. Diemer, T. (1990, July 26). Bush veto of workers' leave upheld. Cleveland Plain Dealer, p. 2A.
20. Dye, T. R. (1995). Who's running America? The Clinton years (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Ehrlich, E., & Garland S. (1988, September 19). For American business: A new world of workers. Business Week, pp. 112-120.
22. Eisenstein, Z. R. (1988). The female body and the law. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23. Family leave's cost. (1996, May 6). Akron Beacon Journal, p. A1.
24. Frank, M., & Lipner, R. (1988). History of maternity leave in Europe and the United States. In E. Zigler & M. Frank (Eds.), Parental leave crisis: Toward a national policy (pp. 3-22). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25. Goldin, D. (1990). Understanding the gender gap: An economic history of American women. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Grantz, C. (1987). Statement submitted on behalf of the Concerned Alliance of Responsible Employers, the National Association of Manufacturers, and the National Federation of Independent Business to the House Committee on Education and Labor on Feb. 25, 1987 in course of subcommittee hearings on H.R. 925, "The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1987" (Serial No. 100-20, pp. 122-135). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
27. Harbrecht, D., & Garland, S. B. (1988, September 26). A Bush flip-flop gives life to the parental leave bill. Business Week, p. 61.
28. Hewitt, M. (1958). Wives andmothers in Victorian industry. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
29. Hewlett, S. A. (1986). A lesser life: The myth of women's liberation in America. New York: William Morrow.
30. Hewlett, S. A. (1989). Family support policy? Consult the bottom line. Management Review, 78, 56-58.
31. Hewlett, S. A. (1991). When the bough breaks: The costs of neglecting our children. New York: Harper Collins.
32. Hewlett, S. A. Ilchman, A. S., & Sweeney, J. R. (Eds.). (1986). Family and work: Bridging the gap. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
33. Hochschild, A. R. (1989). The second shift: Workingparents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking Penguin.
34. Hochschild, A. R. (1994). What's happening to the family: Friendly reforms in the workplace. SWS Network News, 11, 5.
35. Holmes, S. A. (1990, (June 30). Bush vetoes a bill to give workers family leave. New York Times, p. 9.
36. Hyde, J. S., & Essex, M. E. (Eds.). (1991). Parental leave and child care: Setting a research and policy agenda. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
37. Kamerman, S. B. (1991). Parental leave and infant care: U.S. and international trends and issues, 1978-1988. In J. S. Hyde & M. J. Essex (Eds.), Parental leave and child care: Setting a research and policy agenda (pp. 11-23). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
38. Kamerman, S. B., Kahn, A. J., & Kingston, P. (1983). Maternity policies and working women. New York: Columbia University Press.
39. Kanter, R. M. (1989). When giants learn to dance: Mastering the challenge of strategy, management, and careers in the 1990s. New York: Simon and Schuster.
40. Kantrowitz, B., & Wingert, P. (1989, June 5). Parental leave cries to be born. Newsweek, p. 65.
41. Kaplan, D., & Mahtesian, C. (1992, November 7). Election's wave of diversity spares many incumbents. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 50, 3570-3576.
42. Katz, J. L., & Connolly, C. (1992, November 7). Women, minorities block records, but ideology will barely budge. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 50, 3557-3564.
43. Lamp, V. (1987). Statement submitted on behalf of the United States Chamber of Commerce to the House Committee on Education and Labor on Feb. 25, 1987 in course of subcommittee hearings on H.R. 925, "The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1987." (Serial No. 100-20, pp. 101-107). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
44. Malveaux, J. (1994). Gender: Guaranteeing real equality. In R. Caplan & J. Feffer (Eds.), State of the union 1994: The Clinton Administration (pp. 200-213). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
45. Meisenheimer, J. R., II. (1989). Employer provisions for parental leave. Monthly Labor Review, 112, 20-24.
46. Mezacappa, D. (1985, November 24). So a worker can get time out for a baby. Philadelphia Inquirer, p. 1-I
47. Quataert, J. H. (1979). Reluctant feminists in German social democracy, 1885-1917. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48. Radigan, A. L. (1988). Concept and compromise: The evolution of family leave legislation in the U.S. Congress. Washington, DC: Women's Research and Educational Institute.
49. Recio, M. E. (1987, April 6). Should business be forced to help bring up baby? The battle over "mandated benefits" such as parental leave. Business Week, pp. 39-40.
50. Ruess, M. (1993, February 3). Family leave bill reported sailing toward passage. Cleveland Plain Dealer, p. 3-A.
51. Schroeder, P. (1988). Parental leave: The need for a federal policy. In E. Zigler & M. Frank (Eds.), The parental leave crisis: Toward a national policy (pp. 326-338). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
52. Schwartz, F. N. (1989). Management, women and the new facts of life. Harvard Business Review, 67, 65-76.
53. Sheinberg, R. (1988). Parental leave policies of large firms. In E. Zigler & M. Frank (Eds.), The parental leave crisis: Toward a national policy (pp. 211-222). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
54. Signing of bill hailed as gridlock breaker. (1993, February 6). Cleveland Plain Dealer, p. 4-A.
55. Trzcinski, E. (1991). Employers' parental leave policies: Does the labor market provide parental leave? In J. S. Hyde & M. E. Essex (Eds.), Parental leave and child care: Setting a research and policy agenda (pp. 209-223). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
56. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1995). Statistical abstract of the United States: 1995 (115th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
57. U.S. Congress, House. (1990). Debate on the Family and Medical Leave Act, H.R. 770, 101st Cong. 2d. Sess. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
58. U.S. Congress, House. (1991). Debate on the Family and Medical Leave Act, H.R. 2, 102nd Cong. 1st Sess. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
59. U.S. Congress, House. (1993a). Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, P.L. 103-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
60. U.S. Congress, House. (1993b). Debate on the Family and Medical Leave Act, H.R. 1, 103rd Cong. 1st. Sess. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
61. Vogel, L. (1993). Mothers on the job: Maternity policy in the U.S. workplace. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
62. Wilson, G. K. (1981). Interest groups in the United States. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
63. Zigler, E., & Frank, M. (Eds.). (1988). The parental leave crisis: Toward a national policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
64. Zuckman, J. (1993, February 6). As family leave is enacted, some see end to logjam. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 51, 267-269.