Preterm birth prevention post-conization: A model of cervical length screening with targeted cerclage

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 11, 2016, Pages

  Kindinger, Lindsay M ^a,b   Kyrgiou, Maria ^a,c   MacIntyre, David A ^a   Cacciatore, Stefano ^a   Yulia, Angela ^a,d   Cook, Joanna ^a   Terzidou, Vasso ^a,d   Teoh, T G ^a,b   Bennett, Phillip R ^a,c  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN CHARLOTTE S AND CHELSEA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d CHELSEA AND WESTMINSTER HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIDED SUTURE MATERIAL; MONOFILAMENT SUTURE MATERIAL; SUTURE MATERIAL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CERVICAL LENGTH MEASUREMENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LOW RISK POPULATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL HISTORY; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT CODING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREMATURE LABOR; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; TRIAGE PREDICTION MODEL; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CERCLAGE; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; PREGNANCY; PREMATURE BIRTH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; STATISTICAL MODEL; UTERINE CERVIX; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CERCLAGE, CERVICAL; CERVIX UTERI; CONIZATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PREGNANCY; PREMATURE BIRTH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; TRIAGE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84993661563     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163793     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Poon LC, Savvas M, Zamblera D, Skyfta E, Nicolaides KH. Large loop excision of transformation zone and cervical length in the prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2012;119(6):692-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03203.x PMID: 22329452.
2. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006;367(9509):489-98. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736 (06) 68181-6 PMID: 16473126.
3. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, Raifu AO, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. Bmj. 2008;337:a1284. PMID: 18801868; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2544379. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1284
4. Kyrgiou M, Mitra A, Arbyn M, Stasinou SM, Martin-Hirsch P, Bennett P, et al. Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj. 2014;349:g6192. PMID: 25352501; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4212006. doi: 10. 1136/bmj.g6192
5. Bruinsma FJ, Quinn MA. The risk of preterm birth following treatment for precancerous changes in the cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2011;118(9):1031-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02944.x PMID: 21449928.
6. Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Thoresen S, Irgens LM, Iversen OE. Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study. Bmj. 2008;337:a1343. PMID: 18801869; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2544429. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1343
7. Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, Tabor A, Kjaer SK. Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and subsequent risk for spontaneous preterm delivery: a population-based study of singleton deliveries during a 9-year period. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(1):33.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.004 PMID: 19345930.
8. Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Paraskevaidi M, Mitra A, Kalliala I, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj. 2016;354:i3633. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3633 PMID: 27469988; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4964801.
9. Kyrgiou M, Arbyn M, Martin-Hirsch P, Paraskevaidis E. Increased risk of preterm birth after treatment for CIN. Bmj. 2012;345:e5847. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5847 PMID: 22951549.
10. Grimes-Dennis J, Berghella V. Cervical length and prediction of preterm delivery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19(2):191-5. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3280895dd3 PMID: 17353688.
11. Berghella V, Roman A, Daskalakis C, Ness A, Baxter JK. Gestational age at cervical length measurement and incidence of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(2 Pt 1):311-7. doi: 10.1097/01. AOG. 0000270112.05025.1d PMID: 17666605.
12. Owen J, Hankins G, Iams JD, Berghella V, Sheffield JS, Perez-Delboy A, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(4):375.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.015 PMID: 19788970; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2768604.
13. Alfirevic Z, Owen J, Carreras Moratonas E, Sharp AN, Szychowski JM, Goya M. Vaginal progesterone, cerclage or cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in asymptomatic singleton pregnant women with a history of preterm birth and a sonographic short cervix. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;41(2):146-51. doi: 10.1002/uog.12300 PMID: 22991337.
14. Berghella V, Pereira L, Gariepy A, Simonazzi G. Prior cone biopsy: prediction of preterm birth by cervical ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(4):1393-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.087 PMID: 15507971.
15. Kindinger L, Teoh T. Preterm delivery-who is most at risk? An audit of a preterm surveillance clinic. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2013;120(Supplement 3):50. doi: 10. 1111/1471-0528.12496
16. Sharp AN, Alfirevic Z. Provision and practice of specialist preterm labour clinics: a UK survey of practice. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2014;121(4):417-21. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12512 PMID: 24314110.
17. Rafaeli-Yehudai T, Kessous R, Aricha-Tamir B, Sheiner E, Erez O, Meirovitz M, et al. The effect of cervical cerclage on pregnancy outcomes in women following conization. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2014;27(15):1594-7. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.871254 PMID: 24289749.
18. Shin MY, Seo ES, Choi SJ, Oh SY, Kim BG, Bae DS, et al. The role of prophylactic cerclage in preventing preterm delivery after electrosurgical conization. J Gynecol Oncol. 2010;21(4):230-6. doi: 10. 3802/jgo.2010.21.4.230 PMID: 21278884; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3026301.
19. Nam KH, Kwon JY, Kim YH, Park YW. Pregnancy outcome after cervical conization: risk factors for preterm delivery and the efficacy of prophylactic cerclage. J Gynecol Oncol. 2010;21(4):225-9. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2010.21.4.225 PMID: 21278883; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3026300.
20. Odibo AO, Farrell C, Macones GA, Berghella V. Development of a scoring system for predicting the risk of preterm birth in women receiving cervical cerclage. J Perinatol. 2003;23(8):664-7. doi: 10. 1038/sj.jp. 7211004 PMID: 14647165.
21. Israfil-Bayli F, Toozs-Hobson P, Lees C, Slack M, Daniels J, Vince A, et al. Cervical cerclage and type of suture material: a survey of UK consultants' practice. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2014;27(15):1584-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.870551 PMID: 24283438.
22. Berghella V, Szychowski JM, Owen J, Hankins G, Iams JD, Sheffield JS, et al. Suture type and ultrasound-indicated cerclage efficacy. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstet. 2012;25(11):2287-90. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.688081 PMID: 22545593.
23. Henry-Stanley MJ, Hess DJ, Barnes AM, Dunny GM, Wells CL. Bacterial contamination of surgical suture resembles a biofilm. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2010;11(5):433-9. doi: 10.1089/sur.2010.006 PMID: 20673144; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2967823.
24. Fowler JR, Perkins TA, Buttaro BA, Truant AL. Bacteria adhere less to barbed monofilament than braided sutures in a contaminated wound model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(2):665-71. doi: 10. 1007/s11999-012-2593-z PMID: 23001503; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3549181.
25. Kindinger LM, MacIntyre DA, Lee YS, Marchesi JR, Smith A, McDonald JA, et al. Relationship between vaginal microbial dysbiosis, inflammation, and pregnancy outcomes in cervical cerclage. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(350):350ra102. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag1026 PMID: 27488896.
26. Mehta P, Patel P, Olver JM. Functional results and complications of Mersilene mesh use for frontalis suspension ptosis surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(3):361-4. PMID: 14977770; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1772030. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2002.009951
27. Slack M, Sandhu JS, Staskin DR, Grant RC. In vivo comparison of suburethral sling materials. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(2):106-10. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1320-7 PMID: 15995792.
28. Van Winkle W, Hastings JC, Barker E, Hines D, Nichols W. Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975;140(1):7-12. PMID: 1108243.
29. Quinn M. Final report of the MRC/RCOG randomised controlled trial of cervical cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100(12):1154-5. PMID: 8297859.
30. Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, Tabor A, Kjaer SK. Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):1232-8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bf1ef2 PMID: 19935024.
31. Breiman L. Classification and regression trees. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth International Group; 1984.
32. Oh HY, Kim BS, Seo SS, Kong JS, Lee JK, Park SY, et al. The association of uterine cervical microbiota with an increased risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Korea. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.02.026 PMID: 25752224.
33. Chandiramani M, Seed PT, Orsi NM, Ekbote UV, Bennett PR, Shennan AH, et al. Limited relationship between cervico-vaginal fluid cytokine profiles and cervical shortening in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm birth. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052412 PMID: 23300664; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3530581.
34. ONS. Gestation-specific infant mortality in England and Wales, 2008. In: Statistics OfN, editor. http://www.ons.gov. uk/ons/child-health/gestation-specific-infant-mortality-in-englang-and-wales/20082010.
35. Behrendt N, Gibbs RS, Lynch A, Hart J, West NA, Iams JD. Rate of change in cervical length in women with vaginal bleeding during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(2 Pt 1):260-4. http://10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827d8e1b. PMID: 23344274. doi: http://10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827d8e1b
36. Fox NS, Rebarber A, Klauser CK, Peress D, Gutierrez CV, Saltzman DH. Prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic twin pregnancies using the change in cervical length over time. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(2):155. e1-4. Epub 2009/10/23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.09.004 PMID: 19846054.
37. Moroz LA, Simhan HN. Rate of sonographic cervical shortening and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(3):234. e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.11.017 PMID: 22189048.
38. Souka AP, Papastefanou I, Michalitsi V, Salambasis K, Chrelias C, Salamalekis G, et al. Cervical length changes from the first to second trimester of pregnancy, and prediction of preterm birth by firsttrimester sonographic cervical measurement. Journal of ultrasound in medicine: official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2011;30(7):997-1002. PMID: 21705733.
39. Dilek TU, Yazici G, Gurbuz A, Tasdelen B, Gulhan S, Dilek B, et al. Progressive cervical length changes versus single cervical length measurement by transvaginal ultrasound for prediction of preterm delivery. Gynecologic and obstetric investigation. 2007;64(4):175-9. doi: 10.1159/000106486 PMID: 17664877.
40. Naim A, Haberman S Fau-Burgess T, Burgess T Fau-Navizedeh N, Navizedeh N Fau-Minkoff H, Minkoff H. Changes in cervical length and the risk of preterm labor. (0002-9378 (Print)).
41. Pils S, Eppel W, Seemann R, Natter C, Ott J. Sequential cervical length screening in pregnancies after loop excision of the transformation zone conisation: a retrospective analysis. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2014;121(4):457-62. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12390 PMID: 24148580.
42. Arabin B, Alfirevic Z. Cervical pessaries for prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: past, present and future. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;42(4):390-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.12540 PMID: 23775862; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4282542.
43. Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Agudelo A, Tabor A, O'Brien JM, Cetingoz E, et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(2):124. e1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.003 PMID: 22284156; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3437773.
44. Odibo AO, Berghella V, To MS, Rust OA, Althuisius SM, Nicolaides KH. Shirodkar versus McDonald cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervical length. American journal of perinatology. 2007;24(1):55-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-958165 PMID: 17195146.