Exploring Elements of Fun to Motivate Youth to Do Cognitive Bias Modification

Games for Health Journal

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 434-443

  Boendermaker, Wouter J ^a   Boffo, Marilisa ^a   Wiers, Reinout W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; BINGE DRINKING; COGNITION; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOBILE APPLICATION; MOTIVATION; PLEASURE; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REHABILITATION; STUDENT; VIDEO GAME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOLISM; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; BINGE DRINKING; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOBILE APPLICATIONS; MOTIVATION; PLEASURE; STUDENTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; VIDEO GAMES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84993212457     PISSN: 2161783X     EISSN: 21617856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/g4h.2015.0053     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Danielsson A-K, Wennberg P, Hibell B, et al. Alcohol use heavy episodic drinking and subsequent problems among adolescents in 23 European countries: Does the prevention paradox apply? Addiction 2011; 107:71-80.
2. Singleton RA. Collegiate alcohol consumption and academic performance. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2007; 68:548-555.
3. Bonomo YA, Bowes G, Coffey C, et al. Teenage drinking and the onset of alcohol dependence: A cohort study over seven years. Addiction 2004; 99:1520-1528.
4. Werch CE, Owen DM. Iatrogenic effects of alcohol and drug prevention programs. J Stud Alcohol 2002; 63:581-590.
5. Foxcroft DR, Tsertsvadze A. Universal school-based prevention programs for alcohol misuse in young people. Evid Based Child Health 2012; 7:450-575.
6. Deutsch R, Strack F. Reflective and impulsive determinants of addictive behaviors. In: Wiers RW, Stacy AW, eds. Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2006: 45-57.
7. Wiers RW, Bartholow BD, van den Wildenberg E, et al. Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: A review and a model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2007; 86:263-283.
8. Field M, Duka T, Eastwood B, et al. Experimental manipulation of attentional biases in heavy drinkers: Do the effects generalise? Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2007; 192:593-608.
9. Wiers RW, Rinck M, Dictus M, et al. Relatively strong automatic appetitive action-Tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G-allele. Genes Brain Behav 2009; 8:101-106.
10. Grenard JL, Ames SL, Wiers RW, et al. Working memory moderates the predictive effects of drug-related associations on substance use. Psychol Addict Behav 2008; 22:426-432.
11. Houben K, Wiers RW. Response inhibition moderates the relationship between implicit associations and drinking behavior. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2009; 33:626-633.
12. Bickel WK, Christensen DR, Marsch LA. A review of computer-based interventions used in the assessment, treatment, and research of drug addiction. Subst Use Misuse 2011; 46:4-9.
13. Houben K, Nederkoorn C, Wiers RW, et al. Resisting temptation: Decreasing alcohol-related affect and drinking behavior by training response inhibition. Drug Alcohol Depend 2011; 113:132-136.
14. Wiers RW, Gladwin TE, Hofmann W, et al. Cognitive bias modification and cognitive control training in addiction and related psychopathology: Mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and ways forward. Clin Psychol Sci 2013; 1:192-212.
15. Eberl C, Wiers RW, Pawelczack S, et al. Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: Do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best? Dev Cogn Neurosci 2013; 4:38-51.
16. Beard C, Weisberg RB. Socially anxious primary care patients' attitudes toward cognitive bias modification (CBM): A qualitative study. Behav Cogn Psychother 2012; 40:618-633.
17. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. The effects of alcohol on physiological processes and biological development. Alcohol Res Health 2005; 28:125-131.
18. Gladwin TE, Figner B, Crone EA, et al. Addiction adolescence and the integration of control and motivation. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2011; 1:364-376.
19. Dovis S, van der Oord S, Wiers RW, Prins PJ. Can motivation normalize working memory and task persistence in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? The effects of money and computer-gaming. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2012; 40:669-681.
20. Adams E. Fundamentals of Game Design, 3rd ed. San Francisco: New Riders; 2013.
21. Houben K, Havermans RC, Nederkoorn C, et al. Beer à No-Go: Learning to stop responding to alcohol cues reduces alcohol intake via reduced affective associations rather than increased response inhibition. Addiction 2012; 107:1280-1287.
22. van Deursen DS, Salemink E, Smit F, et al. Web-based cognitive bias modification for problem drinkers: Protocol of a randomized controlled trial with a 2x2x2 factorial design. BMC Public Health 2013; 13:674.
23. Enock PM, Stefan GH, McNally RJ. Attention bias modification training via smartphone to reduce social anxiety: A randomized controlled multi-session experiment. Cogn Ther Res 2014; 28:200-216.
24. Dennis T, O'Toole L. Mental health on the go: Effects of a gamified attention-bias modification mobile application in trait-anxious adults. Clin Psychol Sci 2014; 2:576-590.
25. Kraus AA, Hofmann W. Getting in touch with motivation: The Swipe Approach-Avoidance Procedure (SwAAP). In: Kraus A, ed. Indirect Procedures for the Measurement of Approach-Avoidance Motivation [PhD thesis]. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University; 2014: 176-198.
26. Wiers RW, Eberl C, Rinck M, et al. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients' approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychol Sci 2011; 22:490-497.
27. Sweetser P, Wyeth P. Game Flow: A model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Comput Entertain 2005; 3:3A.
28. Liu T-Y, Chu Y-L. Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Comput Educ 2010; 55:630-643.
29. Sobell MB, Sobell LC, Klajner F, et al. The reliability of a timeline method for assessing normal drinker college students' recent drinking history: Utility for alcohol research. Addict Behav 1986; 11:149-161.
30. Wiers RW, Hoogeveen KJ, Sergeant JA, et al. High- and low-dose alcohol-related expectancies and the differential associations with drinking in male and female adolescents and young adults. Addiction 1997; 92:871-888.
31. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, et al. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction 1993; 88:791-804.
32. Fleming MF, Barry KL, MacDonald R. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in a college sample. Subst Use Misuse 1991; 26:1173-1185.
33. Houben K, Schoenmakers TM, Wiers RW. I didn't feel like drinking but I don't know why: The effects of evaluative conditioning on alcohol-related attitudes, craving and behavior. Addict Behav 2010; 35: 1161-1163.
34. Schoenmakers T, de Bruin M, Lux IF, et al. Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients. Drug Alcohol Depend 1020; 109:30-36.
35. Schell J. The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2014.
36. Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20:141-151.
37. Floyd FJ, Widman KF. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assess 1995; 7:286-299.
38. Wiers RW, Rinck M, Kordts R, et al. Retraining automatic action-Tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers. Addiction 2010; 105:279-287.
39. Rinck M, Becker ES. Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2007; 38:105-120.
40. De Houwer J, Crombez G, Baeyens F, et al. On the generality of the affective Simon effect. Cogn Emot 2001; 15:189-206.
41. Field M, Kiernan A, Eastwood B. Rapid approach responses to alcohol cues in heavy drinkers. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2008; 39:209-218.
42. Pronk T, Van Deursen D, Beraha E, et al. Validation of the Amsterdam Beverage Picture Set: A controlled picture set for cognitive bias measurement and modification paradigms. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2015 (in press).
43. Rauschenberger M, Schrepp M, Olschner S, et al. Measurement of user experience: A Spanish language version of the User Experience Questionaire (UEQ). In: 2012 7th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Vol. 1. New York: IEEE; 2012: 471-476.
44. Boffo M, Pronk T, Wiers RW, et al. Combining cognitive bias modification with motivational support in training in alcohol dependent outpatients: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Trials 2015; 16:63.
45. Boendermaker WJ, Prins PJM, Wiers RW. Cognitive bias modification for adolescents with substance use problems-Can serious games help? J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2015; 49:13-20.
46. Kerst WF, Waters AJ. Attentional retraining administered in the field reduces smokers' attentional bias and craving. Health Psychol 2014; 33:1232-1240.
47. Enock PM, Hofmann SG, McNally RJ. Attention bias modification training via smartphone to reduce social anxiety: A randomized, controlled multi-session experiment. Cogn Ther Res 2014; 38:200-216.