Combining cognitive bias modification training with motivational support in alcohol dependent outpatients: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Trials

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Boffo, Marilisa ^a,b,c   Pronk, Thomas ^b   Wiers, Reinout W ^b   Mannarini, Stefania ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Addiction; Alcohol; Approach bias; Attentional bias; Cognitive Bias Modification; Motivational support; Randomised clinical trial

Indexed keywords

4 HYDROXYBUTYRIC ACID; ACAMPROSATE; ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT; ANXIOLYTIC AGENT; DISULFIRAM; NALTREXONE; NEUROLEPTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; ATTENTIONAL BIAS; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; HUMAN; IMPLICIT MEMORY; ITALY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOTIVATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT; PLACEBO EFFECT; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENCE RISK; TRAINING; CLINICAL TRIAL; PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIAL; PSYCHOLOGY; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICAL BIAS;

ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; OUTPATIENTS; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 84924420152     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0576-6     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Hofmann W, Friese M, Strack F. Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009;4:162-76.
2. Strack F, Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8:220-47.
3. Bechara A. Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1458-63.
4. Wiers RW, Teachman B, De Houwer J. Implicit cognitive processes in psychopathology: an introduction. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2007;38:95-104.
5. Hofmann W, Friese M, Wiers RW. Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: a theoretical framework and empirical review. Health Psychol Rev. 2008;2:111-37.
6. Stacy A, Wiers RW. Implicit cognition and addiction: a tool for explaining paradoxical behavior. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:551-75.
7. Gladwin TE, Figner B, Crone EA, Wiers RW. Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2011;1:364-76.
8. Wiers RW, Gladwin TE, Hofmann W, Salemink E, Ridderinkhof KR. Cognitive bias modification and cognitive control training in addiction and related psychopathology: mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and ways forward. Clin Psychol Sci. 2013;1:192-212.
9. Cunningham WA, Zelazo PD. Attitudes and evaluations: a social cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11:97-104.
10. Gladwin TE, Figner B. "Hot" Cognition and Dual Systems: Introduction, Criticisms, and Ways Forward. In: Wilhelms EA, Reyna VF, editors. Neuroeconomics, Judgement and Decision Making. Frontiers of Cognitive Psychology Series. Oxford, UK: Psychology Press; 2014.
11. Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363:3137-46.
12. MacLeod CM, Rutherford E, Campbell L, Ebsworthy G, Holker L. Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002;111:107-23.
13. Fadardi JS, Cox WM. Reversing the sequence: reducing alcohol consumption by overcoming alcohol attentional bias. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;101:137-45.
14. Rinck M, Becker E. Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2007;38:105-20.
15. Wiers RW, Rinck M, Dictus M, Van den Wildenberg E. Relatively strong automatic appetitive action-tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G-allele. Genes Brain Behav. 2009;8:101-6.
16. Schoenmakers TM, Wiers RW, Jones BT, Bruce G, Jansen ATM. Attentional re-training decreases attentional bias in heavy drinkers without generalization. Addiction. 2007;102:399-405.
17. Schoenmakers TM, De Bruin M, Lux IFM, Goertz AG, Van Kerkhof DHT, Wiers RW. Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;109:30-6.
18. Wiers RW, Eberl C, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients' approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychol Sci. 2011;22:490-7.
19. Eberl C, Wiers RW, Pawelczacka S, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: Do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best? Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2013;4:38-51.
20. van Deursen DS, Salemink E, Smit F, Kramer J, Wiers RW. Web-based cognitive bias modification for problem drinkers: protocol of a randomised controlled trial with a 2x2x2 factorial design. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:674.
21. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2002.
22. Noël X, Van der Linden M, d'Acremont M, Colmant M, Hanak C, Pelc I, et al. Cognitive biases toward alcohol-related words and executive deficits in polysubstance abusers with alcoholism. Addiction. 2005;100:1302-9.
23. Bechara A, Martin EM. Impaired decision making related to working memory deficits in individuals with substance addictions. Neuropsychol. 2004;18:152-62.
24. Grenard JL, Ames SL, Wiers RW, Thush C, Sussman S, Stacy AW. Working memory capacity moderates the predictive effects of drug-related associations on substance use. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008;22:426-32.
25. Houben K, Wiers RW. Response inhibition moderates the relationship between implicit associations and drinking behavior. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009;33:626-33.
26. Peeters M, Wiers RW, Monshouwer K, van de Schoot R, Janssen T, Vollebergh WAM. Automatic processes in at-risk adolescents: the role of alcohol-approach tendencies and response inhibition in drinking behavior. Addiction. 2012;107:1939-46.
27. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8:18.
28. Wiers RW, Rinck M, Kordts R, Houben K, Strack F. Re-training automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers. Addiction. 2010;105:279-87.
29. Wiers RW, Gladwin TE, Rinc M. Should we train alcohol-dependent patients to avoid alcohol? Front Psychiatry. 2013;4:33.
30. Field M, Caren R, Fernie G, De Houwer J. Alcohol approach tendencies in heavy drinkers: comparison of effects in a relevant stimulus-response compatibility task and an approach/avoidance Simon task. Psychol Addict Behav. 2011;25:697-701.
31. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992;47:1102-14.
32. Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, DiClemente CC. Changing for good: the revolutionary program that explains the six stages of change and teaches you how to free yourself from bad habits. New York: William Morrow & Co.; 1994.
33. Spiller V, Zavan V, Guelfi GP. Assessing motivation for change in subjects with alcohol problems: the MAC2-A questionnaire. Alcohol Alcohol. 2006;41:616-23.
34. Centre for Substance Abuse Treatment. Enhancing Motivation for Change in Substance Abuse Treatment. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) 35. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment; 1999.
35. Greenwal AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved Scoring Algorithm. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;85:197-216.
36. Lee E, Namkoong K, Lee CH, An SK, Lee BO. Differences of photographs inducing craving between alcoholics and non-alcoholics. Yonsei Med J. 2006;47:491-7.
37. Nees F, Diener C, Smolka MN, Flor H. The role of context in the processing of alcohol-relevant cues. Addict Biol. 2012;17:441-51.
38. Miller MA, Fillmore MT. The effect of image complexity on attentional bias towards alcohol-related images in adult drinkers. Addiction. 2010;105:883-90.
39. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press: Princeton; 1965.
40. Mannarini S. Assessing the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale dimensionality and items functioning in relation to self-efficacy and attachment styles. TPM Test Psychom Methodol Appl Psychol. 2010;4:229-42.
41. Spielberger CD. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: Forma Y. Organizzazioni Speciali: Firenze; 1989.
42. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory: Manual. 2nd ed. Boston: Harcourt Brace; 1996.
43. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Guidelines for Use in Primary Care (2nd Ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence; 2001.
44. Anton RF. Obsessive-compulsive aspects of craving: development of the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale. Addiction. 2000;95 Suppl 2:S211-217.
45. Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol. 1935;18:643-62.
46. Stetter F, Chaluppa C, Ackerman K, Straube ER, Mann K. Alcoholics' selective processing of alcohol related words and cognitive performance on a Stroop task. Eur Psychiatry. 1994;9:71-6.
47. Sriram N, Greenwald AG. The Brief Implicit Association Test. Exp Psychol. 2009;56:283-94.
48. Ostafin BD, Palfai TP. Compelled to consume: the Implicit Association Test and automatic alcohol motivation. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006;20:322-7.
49. Nosek BA, Bar-Anan Y, Sriram N, Axt J, Greenwald AG. Understanding and using the Brief Implicit Association Test: Recommended scoring procedures. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e110938.
50. Devilly GJ, Borkovec TD. Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2000;31:73-86.
51. Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav Res. 2007;42:185-227.
52. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:1373-9.
53. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149-60.
54. Schoenmakers TM, Wiers RW, Field M. Effects of a low dose of alcohol on cognitive biases and craving in heavy drinkers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008;197:169-78.
55. Mogoase C, David D, Koster EHW. Clinical efficacy of attentional bias modification procedures: an updated meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol. 2014;70:1133-57.
56. Cristea IA, Kok RN, Cuijpers P. Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2015;206:7-16.