Stakeholder Integration: Building Mutually Enforcing Relationships

Business & Society

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 36-60

  Heugens, Pursey P m a r ^a   Van Den Bosch, Frans A J ^b   Van Riel, Cees B M ^b  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992847233     PISSN: 00076503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000765030204100104     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stak eholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 507-525.
2. Aldrich, H. E. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Aldrich, H. E. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: Sage Ltd.
4. Aldrich, H. E.,& Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, 645-670.
5. Apel, K.O. (1972). The a priori of communication and the foundation ofthe humanities. Man and World, 51, 3-37.
6. Bazerman, M. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1983). A limited rationality model of interlocking directorates. Academy of Management Review, 8, 206-217.
7. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 488-506.
8. Bresser, R. K.,& Harl, J. E. (1986). Collective strategy: Vice or virtue? Academy of Management Review, 11, 408-427.
9. Chevalier, M. (1966). A wider range of perspectives in the bureaucratic structure. Ottawa, Canada: Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism.
10. Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Dill, W. R. (1958). Environment as an influence on managerial autonomy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 409-443.
12. Donaldson, T.,& Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
13. Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. (1991). Keeping an eye in the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517-554.
14. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660-679.
15. Edelman, L. (1992). Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1531-1576.
16. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
17. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, pp. 31-40.
18. Emery, F., & Trist, E. (1965). The causal texture of or ganizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21-35.
19. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
20. Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 233-236.
21. Freeman, R. E.,& Evan, W. M. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19, 337-359.
22. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24, 191-205.
23. Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Interorganizational relationships. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 281-304.
24. Glaser, B.,& Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies of qualitative research. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson.
25. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Harrison, J. S., & St. John, C. H. (1996). Managing and partnering with external stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 10(2), 46-60.
27. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 986-1014.
28. Hawley, A. (1950). Human ecology. New York: Ronald Press.
29. Jardine, A. (1999). Retailers in retreat on Frankenstein foods. Marketing, p. 7-17.
30. Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis(pp. 143-163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Jick, T. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
32. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404-437.
33. Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 206-221.
34. Kidder, L., & Judd, C. M. (1986). Research methods in social relations. New York: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.
35. Kvale, S. (1996). Inter Views: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461-478.
37. Luoma, P., & Goodstein, J. (1999). Stakeholders and corporate boards: Institutional influences on board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 553-563.
38. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
39. Marens, R. S., Wicks, A. C., & Huber, V. L. (1999). Cooperating with the disempowered: Using ESOPs to forge a stakeholder relationship by anchoring employee trust in workplace participation programs. Business & Society, 38, 51-82.
40. Merton, R. K., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P. L. (1956). The focused interview. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
41. Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis(pp. 41-62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R.,& Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stak eholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
44. Ogden, S.,& Watson, R. (1999). Corporate performance and stakeholder management: Balancing shareholder and customer interests in the U.K. privatized water industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 526-538.
45. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145-179.
46. Pasquero, J. (1991). Supraorganizational collaboration: The Canadian environmental experiment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 38-65.
47. Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48. Pennings, J. (1981). Strategically interdependent organizations. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design(Vol. 1, pp. 433-455). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49. Pettigrew, A., & Whipp, R. (1991). Managing change for competitive success. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
50. Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 218-228.
51. Pfeffer, J., & Nowak, P. (1976). Joint ventures and interorganizational interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 398-418.
52. Pfeffer, J.,& Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
53. Powell, W. W. (1998). Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review, 40, 228-240.
54. Powell, W. W., Koput, K., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks oflearning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116-145.
55. Rao, H., & Sivakumar, K. (1999). Institutional sources of boundary-spanning structures: The establishment ofinvestor relations departments in the Fortune 500 industrials. Organization Science, 10, 27-42.
56. Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stak eholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22, 887-910.
57. Sandberg, J. (2000). Understanding human competence atwork: An interpretative approach. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 9-25.
58. Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59. Schoorman, F. D., Bazerman, M. H., & Atkin, R. S. (1981). Interlocking directorates: A strategy for reducing environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 6, 243-251.
60. Scott, A. (1998). Europe spells reliefL-A-B-E-L-I-N-G. Chemical Week, 160, 9-29.
61. Scott, W. R. (1998). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. New York: Prentice Hall.
62. Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.
63. Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competiti vely valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 729-753.
64. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610.
65. Teece, D. J. (1987). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. In D. J. Teece (Ed.), The competitive challenge: Strategies for industrial innovation and renewal(pp. 185-219). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
66. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
67. Turcotte, M.-F. (1997). Case analysis of a multistakeholder collaborative process in the environmental domain: Consensus, learnings, and innovations as outcomes ofthe “3R” roundtable. Business and Society, 38, 430-434.
68. Westley, F., & Vredenburg, H. (1991). Strategic bridging: The collaboration between environmentalists and businesses in the making of green products. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 65-90.
69. Westley, F.,& Vredenburg, H. (1997). Interorganizational collaboration and the preservation of global biodiversity. Organization Science, 8, 381-403.
70. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691-718.
71. Wood, D. J.,& Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 139-162.
72. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
73. Zald, M. N. (1969). The power and function of boards ofdirectors: A theoretical synthesis. American Journal of Sociology, 75, 97-111.
74. Zucker, L. G. (1983). Organizations as institutions. In S. B. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations(Vol. 2, pp. 1-47). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.