ABA and Academic Instruction

Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 129-136

  Dunlap, Glen ^a   Kern, Lee ^b   Worcester, Jonathan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c School psychology doctoral program at the University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992830265     PISSN: 10883576     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/108835760101600209     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Baer, D.M., Wolf, M.M., & Risley, T.R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91-97.
2. Baker, S.K., Plasencia-Peinado, J., & Lezcano-Lyle, V. (1998). The use of curriculum-based measurement with language-minority students. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 175-213). New York: Guilford Press.
3. Bambara, L.M., & Knoster, T.P. (1998). Designing positive behavior support plans. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
4. Bambara, L.M., Koger, F., Katzer, T., & Davenport, T.A. (1995). Embedding choice in the context of daily routines: An experimental case study. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20, 185-195.
5. Becker, W.C., & Gersten, R. (1982). A follow-up of Follow Through: The later effects of the Direct Instruction Model on children in fifth and sixth grades. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 75-92.
6. Blankenship, C.S. (1985). Using curriculum-based assessment data to make instructional management decisions. Exceptional Children, 42, 233-238.
7. Clarke, S., Dunlap, G., Foster-Johnson, L., Childs, K.E., Wilson, D., White, R., & Vera, A. (1995). Improving the conduct of students with behavioral disorders by incorporating student interests into curricular activities. Behavioral Disorders, 20, 221-237.
8. Cole, C.L., Davenport, T.A., Bambara, L.M., & Ager, C.L. (1997). Effects of choice and task preference on the work performance of students with behavior problems. Behavioral Disorders, 22, 65-74.
9. Daly, E.J., Lentz, F.E., & Boyer, J. (1996). The Instructional Hierarchy: A conceptual model for understanding the effective components of reading interventions. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 369-386.
10. Daly, E.J., Witt, J.C., Martens, B.K., & Dool, E.J. (1997). A model for conducting a functional analysis of academic performance problems. School Psychology Review, 26, 554-574.
11. Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
12. Deno, S.L. (1987). Curriculum-based measurement. Teaching Exceptional Children, 20, 41.
13. Deno, S.L. (1986). Formative evaluation of individual student programs: A new role for school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 15, 357-374.
14. Deno, S.L. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement and special education services: A fundamental and direct relationship. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 1-17). New York: Guilford Press.
15. Dunlap, G. (1984). The influence of task variation and maintenance tasks on the learning and affect of autistic children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 41-64.
16. Dunlap, G. (1997). Response to “Behavioral Support for Students with Severe Disabilities: Functional Assessment and Comprehensive Intervention” by R. H. Horner and E. G. Carr. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 107.
17. Dunlap, G., Clarke, S., & Steiner, M. (1999). Intervention research in behavioral and developmental disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 170-180.
18. Dunlap, G., dePerczel, M., Clarke, S., Wilson, D., Wright, S., White, R., & Gomez, A. (1994). Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 505-518.
19. Dunlap, G., Foster-Johnson, L., Clarke, S., Kern, L., & Childs, K.E. (1995). Modifying activities to produce functional outcomes: Effects on the disruptive behaviors of students with disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20, 248-258.
20. Dunlap, G., & Kern, L. (1993). Assessment and intervention for children within the instructional curriculum. In J. Reichle & D. Wacker (Eds.), Communicative approaches to the management of challenging behavior (pp. 177-203). Baltimore: Brookes.
21. Dunlap, G., & Kern, L. (1996). Modifying instructional activities to promote desirable behavior: A conceptual and practical framework. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 297-312.
22. Dunlap, G., & Kern, L. (1997). Behavior analysis and its relevance to special education. In J.L. Paul, M. Churton, H. Roselli-Kostoryz, W. Morse, K. Marfo, C. Lavely, & D. Thomas (Eds.), Foundations of special education: Basic knowledge informing research and practice in special education (279-290). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/ Cole.
23. Dunlap, G., Kern-Dunlap, L., Clarke, S., & Robbins, F.R. (1991). Functional assessment, curricular revision, and severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 387-397.
24. Dunlap, G., & Kincaid, D. (in press). The widening, wonderful world of functional assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.
25. Dunlap, G., Koegel, R.L., & Burke, J.C. (1981). Educational implications of overselectivity in autistic children. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 20, 37-49.
26. Dunlap, L.K., & Dunlap, G. (1989). A self-monitoring package for teaching subtraction with regrouping to students with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 309-314.
27. Engleman, S., & Carnine, D.W. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. New York: Irvington.
28. Espin, C.A., & Tindal, G. (1998). Curriculum-based measurement for secondary students. In M. R Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (214-253). New York: Guilford Press.
29. Foster-Johnson, L., & Dunlap, G. (1993). Using functional assessment to develop effective, individualized interventions. Teaching Exceptional Children, 25, 44-50.
30. Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Curriculum-based assessment of progress toward long-term and short-term goals. The Journal of Special Education, 20, 69-82.
31. Gickling, E., & Havertape, J. (1981). Curriculum-based assessment. Minneapolis, MN: National School Psychology Inservice Training Network.
32. Halle, J.W. (1995). Innovations in choice-making research: An editorial introduction. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20, 173-174.
33. Harding, J.W., Wacker, D.P., Berg, W.K., Cooper, L.J., Asmus, J., Mlela, K., & Muller, J. (1999). An analysis of choice making in the assessment of young children with severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 63-82.
34. Horner, R.H., Day, H.M., & Day, J.R. (1997). Using neutralizing routines to reduce problem behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 601-614.
35. Horner, R.H., Day, H.M., Sprague, J.R., O'Brien, M., & Heathfield, L.T. (1991). Interspersed requests: A nonaversive procedure for reducing aggression and self-injury during instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 265-278.
36. Howell, K.W., Fox, S.L., Morehead, M.K., (1993). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making (2nd ed). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
37. IDEA Amendments of 1997, 11 Stat. 37 (20 U.S.C. § 1401 [26])
38. Iwata, B. A., Bailey, J. S., Neef, N. A., Wacker, D. P., Repp, A. C., & Shook, G. L. (Eds.). (1999). Behavior analysis in developmental disabilities (3rd ed.). Lawrence: University of Kansas, Department of Human Development.
39. Kaminski, R.A., & Good, R.H. (1998). Assessing early literacy skills in a problem-solving model: Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum -based measurement (pp. 113-142). New York: Guilford Press.
40. Kennedy, C.H., & Itkonen, T. (1993). Effects of setting events on the problem behaviors of students with severe disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 321-327.
41. Kern, L., Childs, K.E., Dunlap, G., Clarke, S., & Falk, G.D. (1994). Using assessment-based curricular intervention to improve the classroom behavior of a student with emotional and behavioral challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 7-19.
42. Kern, L., Delaney, B., Clarke, S., Dunlap, G., & Childs, K.E. (2000). Improving the classroom behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders using individualized curricular modifications. Manuscript submitted for publication.
43. Kern, L., Mantegna, M.E., Vorndran, C.M., Bailin, D., & Hilt, A. (in press). Choice of task sequence to increase engagement and reduce problem behaviors. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions.
44. Koegel, L.K., Harrower, J.K., & Koegel, R.L. (1999). Support for children with developmental disabilities in full inclusion classrooms through self-management. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 26-34.
45. Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L.K. (Eds.) (1995). Teaching children with autism. Baltimore: Brookes.
46. Lovaas, O.I., Koegel, R.L., & Schreibman L. (1979). Stimulus overselectivity in autism: A review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 1236-1254.
47. Luiselli, J. K., & Cameron, M. J. (Eds.). (1998). Antecedent control: Innovative approaches to behavioral support. Baltimore: Brookes.
48. Marston, D.B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it? In M. R Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford Press.
49. Martens, B.K., Witt, J.C., Daly, E.J., & Vollmer, T.R. (1988). Behavior analysis: Theory and practice in educational settings. In C. R Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.). The handbook of school psychology (3rd Ed.). New York: Wiley.
50. Moes, D.R., & Frea, W.D. (2000). Using family context to inform intervention planning for the treatment of a child with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 40-46.
51. Powell-Smith, K.A., & Habedank-Stewart, L. (1998). The use of curriculum-based measurement in the reintegration of students with mild disabilities. In M. R Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 254-308). New York: Guilford Press.
52. Repp, A.C., & Horner, R.H. (1999). Functional analysis of problem behavior: From effective assessment to effective support. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
53. Schreibman, L. (1975). Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting on the discrimination learning of autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 91-112.
54. Scott, T.M., & Nelson, C.M. (1999). Using functional behavioral assessment to develop effective intervention plans: Practical classroom applications. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 242-251.
55. Shapiro, E.S. (1990). An integrated model for curriculum-based assessment. School Psychology Review, 19, 331-349.
56. Shapiro, E.S., & Lentz, F.E. (1985). Assessing academic behavior: A behavioral approach. School Psychology Review, 14, 325-338.
57. Shinn, M. R (Ed.). (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 1-31). New York: Guilford Press.
58. Shinn, M.R., & Bamonto, S. (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement: “Big ideas” and avoiding confusion. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum -based measurement (pp. 1-31). New York: Guilford Press.
59. Shinn, M.R., & Hubbard, D.D. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement and problem-solving assessment: Basic procedures and outcomes. Focus on Exceptional Children, 24, 1-20.
60. Shinn, M.R., Rosenfield, S., & Knutson, N. (1989). Curriculum-based assessment: A comparison of models. School Psychology Review, 18, 299-316.
61. Shinn, M.R., Tindal, G.A., & Stein, S. (1988). Curriculum-based measurement and the identification of mildly handicapped students: A research review. Professional School Psychology, 3, 69-85.
62. Singer, G.H., Singer, J., & Horner, R.H. (1987). Using pretask requests to increase the probability of compliance for students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 287-291.
63. Sulzer, B., & Mayer, G.R. (1972). Behavior modification procedures for school personnel. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
64. Umbreit, J., & Blair, K. (1996). The effects of preference, choice, and attention on problem behavior at school. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 151-161.
65. Weeks, M., & Gaylord-Ross, R. (1981). Task difficulty and aberrant behavior in severely handicapped students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 19-36.
66. Winterling, V., Dunlap, G., & O'Neill, R.E. (1987). The influence of task variation on the aberrant behaviors of autistic children. Education and Treatment of Children, 10, 105-119.
67. Wolery, M., Bailey, D.B., & Sugai, G.M. (1988). Effective teaching: Principles and procedures of applied behavior analysis with exceptional students. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.