Analysis of complex decisional situations in companies with the support of AHP extension of vroom-yetton contingency model

IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)

Volumn 46, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 549-554

  Mls, K ^a   Otcenaskova T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HRADEC KRALOVE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Decision support systems; Decision tree; Hierarchical decision making; Multi criteria modelling; Sensitivity analysis; Vroom yetton contingency model

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPETITION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION TREES; EXPERT SYSTEMS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MANUFACTURE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; CONTINGENCY MODELS; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; FUZZY DECISION TREES; HIERARCHICAL DECISIONS; INDIVIDUAL DECISION MAKING; MULTI-CRITERIA;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84884305033     PISSN: 14746670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3182/20130619-3-RU-3018.00546     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Adamo, J.M. (1980). Fuzzy decision tree. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 4(3), pp. 207-219.
2. Brown, F.W. and Finstuen, K. (1993). The use of participation in decision making: a consideration of the Vroom-Yetton and Vroom-Jago normative models. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6(3), pp. 207-219.
3. Brožová, H. (2004). The analytic hierarchy process for the decision tree with multiple criteria. Agricultural Economics, 50(2), pp. 77-82.
4. Field, R.H.G. (1979). A critique of the Vroom-Yetton contingency model of leadership behavior. Academy of Management Review, 4(2), pp. 249-257.
5. Field, R.G. (1982). A test of the Vroom-Yetton normative model of leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(5), pp. 523-532.
6. Genrich, S.J., Banks, J.C., Bufton, K. and Savage, M.E. (2001). Group involvement in decision-making: A pilot study. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 32(1), pp. 20-26.
7. Jago, A.G., and Vroom, V.H. (1980). An evaluation of two alternatives to the Vroom-Yetton normative model. Academy of Management Journal, 23(2), pp. 347-355.
8. Jago, A.G. and Vroom, V.H. (1973). Decision making as a social process. Decision Sciences, 5, pp. 743-755.
9. Pecchia, L. et al. (2013). User needs elicitation via analytic hierarchy process (AHP). A case study on a Computed Tomography (CT) scanner. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13:2.
10. Quinlan, J.R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1, pp. 81-106.
11. Ramik, J. and Korviny, P. (2009). Inconsistency of pair-wise comparison matrix with fuzzy elements based on geometric mean. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 161, pp. 1604-1613.
12. Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
13. Saaty, T.L. (2009). Theory and applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
14. Stancu, I. and Rece, D. (2010). Embedded banking security level index and aimed control template for banking systems - implementation evaluation using the Vroom-Yetton-Jago contingency model. The Review of Finance and Banking, 2(2), pp. 77-82.
15. Vroom, V.H. and Jago, A.G. (1988). The New Leadership: Managing Participation in Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Vroom, V.H. and Yetton, P.W. (1973). Leadership and Decision-Making. University of Pittsburgh Press, Feiffer and Simons, Inc., London.
17. Yuan, Y. and Shaw, M.J. (1995). Induction of fuzzy decision trees. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 69(2), pp. 125-139.