Bridging the gap between HRA research and HRA practice: A Bayesian network version of SPAR-H

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 115, Issue , 2013, Pages 33-42

  Groth, Katrina M ^a   Swiler, Laura P ^a  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian network (BN); Causality; Context uncertainty; Human reliability analysis (HRA); SPAR H

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; NUCLEAR INDUSTRY; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS (BNS); CAUSALITY; CONTEXT UNCERTAINTY; HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR-POWER INDUSTRY; RISK AND RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SPAR-H; U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84875135974     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.015     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. A. Mosleh, and Y.H. Chang Model-based human reliability analysis prospects and requirements Reliability Engineering and System Safety 83 2 2004 241 253
2. O. Sträter Considerations on the elements of quantifying human reliability Reliability Engineering and System Safety 83 2 2004 255 264 (Human reliability analysis: data issues and errors of commission)
3. Adhikari S, Bayley C, Bedford T, Busby JS, Cliffe A, Devgun G, et al. Human reliability analysis: a review and critique, Manchester Business School Working Paper No 589, Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; 2009. URL 〈 http://www.mbs.ac.uk/research/workingpapers/ 〉.
4. S. French, T. Bedford, S.J.T. Pollard, and E. Soane Human reliability analysis a critique and review for managers Safety Science 49 6 2011 753 763
5. Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations (CSNI) Working Group on Risk (WGRisk). HRA data and recommended actions to support the collection and exchange of HRA data. Technical Report NEA/CSNI/R(2008)9, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency; October 2008.
6. E.M. Dougherty Human reliability analysis - where shouldst thou turn? Reliability Engineering and System Safety 29 3 1990 283 299
7. Oxstrand J. Human reliability guidance - how to increase the synergies between human reliability, human factors, and system design & engineering. Phase 2: the American point of view - insights of how the US nuclear industry works with human reliability analysis. Tech. Rep. NKS-229, Nordic Nuclear Safety Research Council (NKS); December 2010. URL 〈 http://nks.org/en/nksr/ reports/ 〉.
8. E. Hollnagel Looking for errors of omission and commission or the hunting of the snark revisited Reliability Engineering and System Safety 68 2 2000 135 145
9. Boring RL, Griffith CD, Joe JC. The measure of human error: direct and indirect performance shaping factors. In: IEEE 8th human factors and power plants and HPRCT 13th annual meeting; 2007. p. 170-6.
10. S. Mahadevan, R. Zhang, and N. Smith Bayesian networks for system reliability reassessment Structural Safety 23 3 2001 231 251 (Pubitemid 34060672)
11. H. Langseth, and L. Portinale Bayesian networks in reliability Reliability Engineering and System Safety 92 1 2007 92 108 (Pubitemid 44332140)
12. P. Weber, G. Medina-Oliva, C. Simon, and B. Iung Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 25 4 2012 671 682
13. L.D. Phillips, P.C. Humphreys, D.E. Embrey, and D. Selby A socio-technical approach to assessing human reliability R.M. Oliver, J.Q. Smith, Influence diagrams, belief nets, and decision analysis 1990 John Wiley and Sons
14. M.C. Kim, P.H. Seong, and E. Hollnagel A probabilistic approach for determining the control mode in CREAM Reliability Engineering and System Safety 91 2 2006 191 199 (Pubitemid 41394417)
15. P. Trucco, E. Cagno, F. Ruggeri, and O. Grande A Bayesian belief network modelling of organisational factors in risk analysis a case study in maritime transportation Reliability Engineering and System Safety 93 6 2008 845 856 (Pubitemid 351305172)
16. Z. Mohaghegh, and A. Mosleh Incorporating organizational factors into probabilistic risk assessment of complex socio-technical systems principles and theoretical foundations Safety Science 47 8 2009 1139 1158
17. Groth KM. A data-informed model of performance shaping factors for use in human reliability analysis. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD; 2009. URL 〈 http://gradworks.umi.com/33/91/3391233.html 〉.
18. K.M. Groth, and A. Mosleh Deriving causal Bayesian networks from human reliability analysis data a methodology and example model Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability 226 4 2012 361 379
19. Baraldi P, Conti M, Librizzi M, Zio E, Podofillini L, Dang VN. A Bayesian network model for dependence assessment in human reliability analysis. In: Proceedings of the european society for reliability annual meeting (ESREL 2009), Prague; 2009.
20. M. De Ambroggi, and P. Trucco Modelling and assessment of dependent performance shaping factors through analytic network process Reliability Engineering and System Safety 96 7 2011 849 860
21. Mindock J. Development and application of spaceflight performance sharping factors for human reliability analysis. PhD thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO; 2012.
22. Y.F. Wang, M. Xie, K.M. Ng, and M.S. Habibullah Probability analysis of offshore fire by incorporating human and organizational factor Ocean Engineering 38 17-18 2011 2042 2055
23. P. Brooker Experts, bayesian belief networks, rare events and aviation risk estimates Safety Science 49 8-9 2011 1142 1155
24. Humphreys P. Human reliability assessors guide. United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority. Safety and Reliability Directorate; 1995.
25. B. Kirwan Validation of human reliability assessment techniques part 1 - validation issues Safety Science 27 1 1997 25 41 (Pubitemid 27455847)
26. B. Kirwan Validation of human reliability assessment techniques part 2 - validation results Safety Science 27 1 1997 43 75 (Pubitemid 27455848)
27. Lois E, Dang VN, Forester J, Broberg H, Massaiu S, Hildebrandt M, et al. International HRA empirical study - phase 1 report: description of overall approach and pilot phase results from comparing HRA methods to simulator performance data, NUREG IA-0216. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC; November 2009.
28. D. Gertman, H. Blackman, J. Marble, J. Byers, and C. Smith The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method. NUREG/CR-6883 2005 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC
29. S.E. Cooper, A.M. Ramey-Smith, J. Wreathall, G.W. Parry, D.C. Bley, and W.J. Luckas A technique for human error analysis ATHEANA, NUREG/CR-6350 1996 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC
30. Hendrickson SML, Forester JA, Dang VN, Mosleh A, Lois E, Xing J. HRA method analysis criteria. In: Proceedings of the international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management (PSAM 11); 2012.
31. Wang C. Hybrid causal logic methodology for risk assessment. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD; 2007.
32. B. Hallbert, R. Boring, D. Gertman, D. Dudenhoeffer, A. Whaley, and J. Marble Human events repository analysis (HERA) system overview, NUREG/CR-6903 vol. 1 2006 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC
33. B. Hallbert, and A. Kolaczkowski The employment of empirical data and Bayesian methods in human reliability analysis a feasibility study. NUREG/CR-6949 2007 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC
34. J. Pearl Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems networks of plausible inference 1988 Morgan Kaufmann
35. F.V. Jensen, and T.D. Nielsen Bayesian networks and decision graphs 2007 Springer Verlag
36. M.J. Druzdzel, and F.J. Díez Combining knowledge from different sources in causal probabilistic models Journal of Machine Learning Research 4 2003 295 316
37. J.H. Sigurdsson, L.A. Walls, and J.L. Quigley Bayesian belief nets for managing expert judgement and modelling reliability Quality and Reliability Engineering International 17 3 2001 181 190 (Pubitemid 32636639)
38. J. Pearl Fusion, propagation, and structuring in belief networks Artificial Intelligence 29 3 1986 241 288
39. J. Pearl Causality models, reasoning, and inference 2000 Cambridge University Press
40. D. Koller, and N. Friedman Probabilistic graphical models principles and techniques 2009 The MIT Press
41. Hugin Expert, version 7.5, 2011. URL 〈 www.hugin.com 〉.
42. GeNIe, version 2.0, 2010. URL 〈 http://genie.sis.pitt.edu 〉.
43. K. Groth, C. Wang, and A. Mosleh Hybrid causal methodology and software platform for probabilistic risk assessment and safety monitoring of socio-technical systems Reliability Engineering and System Safety 95 12 2010 1276 1285 (19th European safety and reliability conference)
44. T.-C. Lu, and M.J. Druzdzel Interactive construction of graphical decision models based on causal mechanisms European Journal of Operational Research 199 3 2009 873 882
45. S.L. Lauritzen, and D.J. Spiegelhalter Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 50 2 1988 157 224
46. M.J. Druzdzel, and L.C. van der Gaag Building probabilistic networks: where do the numbers come from? IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 12 4 2000 481 486
47. Bastian P. On the grid: careers in energy. In: Occupational outlook quarterly, 2008. p. 34.
48. Whaley AM, Kelly DL, Boring RL, Galyean WJ. SPAR-H step-by-step guidance. In: Proceedings of the international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management (PSAM 11); 2012.
49. Groth KM, Mosleh A. A data-informed PIF hierarchy for model-based human reliability analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2012;108:154-174.
50. Whaley AM, Kelly DL, Boring RL. Guidance on dependence assessment in SPAR-H. In: Proceedings of the international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management (PSAM 11); 2012.