메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 127, Issue 6, 2016, Pages E175-E182

Refusal of Medically Recommended Treatment During Pregnancy

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; COERCION; COURT; DIRECTIVE COUNSELING; EMERGENCY PATIENT; FEMALE; FETUS RISK; HUMAN; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; TREATMENT REFUSAL; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; OBSTETRICS; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; STANDARDS;

EID: 84992357364     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001485     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (66)

References (34)
  • 1
    • 77649213935 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Moral distress, moral residue, and the crescendo effect
    • [PubMed] [Full Text]
    • Epstein EG, Hamric AB. Moral distress, moral residue, and the crescendo effect. J Clin Ethics 2009;20:330–42. [PubMed] [Full Text] ^
    • (2009) J Clin Ethics , vol.20 , pp. 330-342
    • Epstein, EG1    Hamric, AB.2
  • 2
    • 79953199324 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ACOG Committee Opinion No. 439. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    • [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology]
    • Informed consent. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 439. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:401–8. [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology] ^
    • (2009) Obstet Gynecol , vol.114 , pp. 401-408
  • 3
    • 79961085144 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Maternal-fetal intervention and fetal care centers. Committee Opinion No. 501. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    • [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology]
    • Maternal-fetal intervention and fetal care centers. Committee Opinion No. 501. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:405–10. [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology] ^
    • (2011) Obstet Gynecol , vol.118 , pp. 405-410
  • 6
    • 50949083821 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A critical analysis of the concept and discourse of ‘unborn child’
    • [PubMed]
    • McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. A critical analysis of the concept and discourse of ‘unborn child’. Am J Bioeth 2008;8:34–9. [PubMed] ^
    • (2008) Am J Bioeth , vol.8 , pp. 34-39
    • McCullough, LB1    Chervenak, FA.2
  • 7
    • 0026494271 scopus 로고
    • The maternal-fetal dyad. Exploring the two-patient obstetric model
    • [PubMed]
    • Mattingly SS. The maternal-fetal dyad. Exploring the two-patient obstetric model. Hastings Cent Rep 1992;22:13–8. [PubMed] ^
    • (1992) Hastings Cent Rep , vol.22 , pp. 13-18
    • Mattingly, SS.1
  • 8
    • 0033783607 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rethinking maternal-fetal conflict: gender and equality in perinatal ethics
    • [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology]
    • Harris LH. Rethinking maternal-fetal conflict: gender and equality in perinatal ethics. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:786–91. [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology] ^
    • (2000) Obstet Gynecol , vol.96 , pp. 786-791
    • Harris, LH.1
  • 9
    • 0037414224 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • MSJAMA. The status of pregnant women and fetuses in US criminal law
    • [PubMed] [Full Text]
    • Harris LH, Paltrow L. MSJAMA. The status of pregnant women and fetuses in US criminal law. JAMA 2003;289:1697–9. [PubMed] [Full Text] ^
    • (2003) JAMA , vol.289 , pp. 1697-1699
    • Harris, LH1    Paltrow, L.2
  • 10
    • 50949102342 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A critique of the ‘fetus as patient’
    • 4; discussion W4–6. [PubMed] [Full Text]
    • Lyerly AD, Little MO, Faden RR. A critique of the ‘fetus as patient’. Am J Bioeth 2008;8:42–4; discussion W4–6. [PubMed] [Full Text] ^
    • (2008) Am J Bioeth , vol.8 , pp. 42
    • Lyerly, AD1    Little, MO2    Faden, RR.3
  • 11
    • 84900427351 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The fetus, the “potential child,” and the ethical obligations of obstetricians
    • [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology]
    • Minkoff H, Marshall MF, Liaschenko J. The fetus, the “potential child,” and the ethical obligations of obstetricians. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:1100–3. [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology] ^
    • (2014) Obstet Gynecol , vol.123 , pp. 1100-1103
    • Minkoff, H1    Marshall, MF2    Liaschenko, J.3
  • 12
    • 0023033980 scopus 로고
    • Pregnant women as fetal containers
    • [PubMed]
    • Annas GJ. Pregnant women as fetal containers. Hastings Cent Rep 1986;16:13–4. [PubMed] ^
    • (1986) Hastings Cent Rep , vol.16 , pp. 13-14
    • Annas, GJ.1
  • 13
    • 0034802429 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Toward the ethical evaluation and use of maternal-fetal surgery
    • [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology]
    • Lyerly AD, Gates EA, Cefalo RC, Sugarman J. Toward the ethical evaluation and use of maternal-fetal surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:689–97. [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology] ^
    • (2001) Obstet Gynecol , vol.98 , pp. 689-697
    • Lyerly, AD1    Gates, EA2    Cefalo, RC3    Sugarman, J.4
  • 15
    • 84956697336 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Fetal risks, relative risks, and relatives’ risks
    • [PubMed]
    • Minkoff H, Marshall MF. Fetal risks, relative risks, and relatives’ risks. Am J Bioeth 2016;16:3–11. [PubMed] ^
    • (2016) Am J Bioeth , vol.16 , pp. 3-11
    • Minkoff, H1    Marshall, MF.2
  • 16
    • 84876533095 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence-based persuasion: an ethical imperative
    • [PubMed] [Full Text]
    • Shaw D, Elger B. Evidence-based persuasion: an ethical imperative. JAMA 2013;309:1689–90. [PubMed] [Full Text] ^
    • (2013) JAMA , vol.309 , pp. 1689-1690
    • Shaw, D1    Elger, B.2
  • 18
    • 0037344963 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Refusal of treatment during pregnancy
    • vii–viii. [PubMed]
    • Adams SF, Mahowald MB, Gallagher J. Refusal of treatment during pregnancy. Clin Perinatol 2003;30:127–40, vii–viii. [PubMed] ^
    • (2003) Clin Perinatol , vol.30 , pp. 127-140
    • Adams, SF1    Mahowald, MB2    Gallagher, J.3
  • 19
    • 0038687246 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A comparative analysis of the right of a pregnant woman to refuse medical treatment for herself and her viable fetus: the United States and United Kingdom
    • [PubMed]
    • Glass BJ. A comparative analysis of the right of a pregnant woman to refuse medical treatment for herself and her viable fetus: the United States and United Kingdom. Indiana Int Comp Law Rev 2001;11:507–41. [PubMed] ^
    • (2001) Indiana Int Comp Law Rev , vol.11 , pp. 507-541
    • Glass, BJ.1
  • 20
    • 85028914864 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Inconsistent state court rulings concerning pregnancy-related behaviors
    • Hoffman L, Miller MK. Inconsistent state court rulings concerning pregnancy-related behaviors. J Law Health 2009;22:279–93. ^
    • (2009) J Law Health , vol.22 , pp. 279-293
    • Hoffman, L1    Miller, MK.2
  • 21
    • 0023848810 scopus 로고
    • Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women. Life, liberty, and law in conflict
    • [PubMed]
    • Nelson LJ, Milliken N. Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women. Life, liberty, and law in conflict. JAMA 1988;259:1060–6. [PubMed] ^
    • (1988) JAMA , vol.259 , pp. 1060-1066
    • Nelson, LJ1    Milliken, N.2
  • 22
    • 0023186857 scopus 로고
    • Court-ordered obstetrical interventions
    • [PubMed]
    • Kolder VE, Gallagher J, Parsons MT. Court-ordered obstetrical interventions. N Engl J Med 1987;316:1192–6. [PubMed] ^
    • (1987) N Engl J Med , vol.316 , pp. 1192-1196
    • Kolder, VE1    Gallagher, J2    Parsons, MT.3
  • 23
    • 84877812643 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Arrests of and forced interventions on pregnant women in the United States, 1973-2005: implications for women’s legal status and public health
    • [PubMed] [Full Text]
    • Paltrow LM, Flavin J. Arrests of and forced interventions on pregnant women in the United States, 1973-2005: implications for women’s legal status and public health. J Health Polit Policy Law 2013;38:299–343. [PubMed] [Full Text] ^
    • (2013) J Health Polit Policy Law , vol.38 , pp. 299-343
    • Paltrow, LM1    Flavin, J.2
  • 24
    • 84961729676 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Management of pregnant patients who refuse medically indicated cesarean delivery
    • [PubMed] [Full Text]
    • Deshpande NA, Oxford CM. Management of pregnant patients who refuse medically indicated cesarean delivery. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2012;5:e144–50. [PubMed] [Full Text] ^
    • (2012) Rev Obstet Gynecol , vol.5 , pp. e144-e150
    • Deshpande, NA1    Oxford, CM.2
  • 25
    • 70449647088 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Risk management for the emergency physician: competency and decision-making capacity, informed consent, and refusal of care against medical advice
    • viii. [PubMed]
    • Magauran BG Jr. Risk management for the emergency physician: competency and decision-making capacity, informed consent, and refusal of care against medical advice. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2009;27:605–14, viii. [PubMed] ^
    • (2009) Emerg Med Clin North Am , vol.27 , pp. 605-614
    • Magauran, BG1
  • 26
    • 79954432521 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Empathy in women’s health care. Committee Opinion No. 480. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    • [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology]
    • Empathy in women’s health care. Committee Opinion No. 480. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:756–61. [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology] ^
    • (2011) Obstet Gynecol , vol.117 , pp. 756-761
  • 27
    • 79955538321 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cultural sensitivity and awareness in the delivery of health care. Committee Opinion No. 493. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    • [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology]
    • Cultural sensitivity and awareness in the delivery of health care. Committee Opinion No. 493. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1258–61. [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology] ^
    • (2011) Obstet Gynecol , vol.117 , pp. 1258-1261
  • 28
    • 84894056194 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effective patient-physician communication. Committee Opinion No. 587. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    • [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology]
    • Effective patient-physician communication. Committee Opinion No. 587. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:389–93. [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology] ^
    • (2014) Obstet Gynecol , vol.123 , pp. 389-393
  • 29
    • 38449087151 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ethical decision making in obstetrics and gynecology. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 390. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    • [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology]
    • Ethical decision making in obstetrics and gynecology. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 390. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1479–87. [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology] ^
    • (2007) Obstet Gynecol , vol.110 , pp. 1479-1487
  • 30
    • 85122732280 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Committee Opinion No. 585. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    • [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology]
    • Health literacy. Committee Opinion No. 585. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:380–3. [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology] ^
    • (2014) Obstet Gynecol , vol.123 , pp. 380-383
  • 32
    • 33746295319 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ethics and the law in emergency medicine
    • [PubMed]
    • Derse AR. Ethics and the law in emergency medicine. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2006;24:547–55. [PubMed] ^
    • (2006) Emerg Med Clin North Am , vol.24 , pp. 547-555
    • Derse, AR.1
  • 33
    • 0032839554 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Informed consent in the emergency department
    • ix–x. [PubMed]
    • Moskop JC. Informed consent in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1999;17:327–40, ix–x. [PubMed] ^
    • (1999) Emerg Med Clin North Am , vol.17 , pp. 327-340
    • Moskop, JC.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.