Ethical decision making in obstetrics and gynecology

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 110, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1479-1487

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENEFICENCE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONFIDENTIALITY; FEMINISM; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; JUSTICE; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHICS; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; OBSTETRICS; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PREGNANCY;

DECISION MAKING; ETHICS, MEDICAL; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; OBSTETRICS; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PREGNANCY;

EID: 38449087151     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000291573.09193.36     Document Type: Note

References (38)

1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2001.
2. Childress JF. Methods in bioethics. In: Steinbock B, editor. The Oxford handbook of bioethics. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 15-45.
3. Pellegrino ED. The metamorphosis of medical ethics. A 30-year retrospective. JAMA 1993;269:1158-62.
4. Steinbock B, Arras JD, London AJ, editors. Ethical issues in modern medicine. 6th ed. Boston (MA): McGraw-Hill; 2003.
5. Beauchamp TL, Walters L, editors. Contemporary issues in bioethics. 6th ed. Belmont (CA): Thomson Wadsworth; 2003.
6. Mappes TA, DeGrazia D, editors. Biomedical ethics. 6th ed. Boston (MA): McGraw-Hill; 2006.
7. McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1994.
8. Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC. The virtues in medical practice. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1993.
9. Pellegrino ED. Toward a virtue-based normative ethics for the health professions. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1995;5:253-77.
10. Gilligan C. Moral orientation and moral development. In: Kittay EF, Meyers DT, editors. Women and moral theory. Totowa (NJ): Rowman and Littlefield; 1987. p. 19-33.
11. Manning RC. A care approach. In: Kuhse H, Singer P, editors. A companion to bioethics. Malden (MA): Blackwell; 1998. p. 98-105.
12. Little MO. Why a feminist approach to bioethics? Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1996;6:1-18.
13. Koenigs M, Young L, Adolphs R, Tranel D, Cushman F, Hauser M, et al. Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements [letter]. Nature 2007;446:908-11.
14. Greene JD, Sommerville RB, Nystrom LE, Darley JM, Cohen JD. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 2001;293:2105-8.
15. Tong R. Feminist approaches to bioethics. In: Wolf SM, editor. Feminism and bioethics: beyond reproduction. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 67-94.
16. Sherwin S. No longer patient: feminist ethics and health care. Philadelphia (PA): Temple University Press; 1992.
17. Callahan D. Principlism and communitarianism. J Med Ethics 2003;29:287-91.
18. Jonsen AR. Casuistry: an alternative or complement to principles? Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1995;5:237-51.
19. Jonsen AR, Toulmin S. The abuse of casuistry: a history of moral reasoning. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press; 1990.
20. Hope T. Medical ethics: a very short introduction. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2004.
21. Veatch RM. The basics of bioethics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; 2003.
22. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA 1992;267:2221-6.
23. Childress JF, Siegler M. Metaphors and models of doctor-patient relationships: their implications for autonomy. Theor Med 1984;5:17-30.
24. Katz J. The silent world of doctor and patient. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press; 2002.
25. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Surgery and patient choice. In: Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2004. p. 21-5.
26. Expert testimony. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 374. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:445-6.
27. Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ. Clinical ethics: a practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. 6th ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 2006.
28. Asch A. Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a challenge to practice and policy. Am J Public Health 1999;89:1649-57.
29. Parens E, Asch A. The disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing. Reflections and recommendations. Hastings Cent Rep 1999;29:S1-22.
30. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS. Assessing competence to consent to treatment: a guide for physicians and other health professionals. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1998.
31. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Informed consent. In: Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2004. p. 9-17.
32. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Human resources. In: Guidelines for women's health care. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2007. p. 15-29.
33. Commercial enterprises in medical practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 359. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:243-5.
34. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Relationships with industry. In: Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2004. p. 107-10.
35. Pellegrino ED. The anatomy of clinical-ethical judgments in perinatology and neonatology: a substantive and procedural framework. Semin Perinatol 1987;11:202-9.
36. Kanoti GA. Ethics and medical-ethical decisions. Crit Care Clin 1986;2:3-12.
37. Abrams FR. Bioethical considerations for high-risk pregnancy. In: Abrams RS, Wexler P, editors. Medical care of the pregnant patient. Boston (MA): Little, Brown and Co.; 1983. p. 1-12.
38. Fletcher JC, Spencer EM, Lombardo P, editors. Fletcher's introduction to clinical ethics. 3rd ed. Hagerstown (MD): University Publishing Group; 2005.