|
|
Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 507-541
|
|
A comparative analysis of the right of a pregnant woman to refuse medical treatment for herself and her viable fetus: the United States and United Kingdom.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BLOOD TRANSFUSION;
CESAREAN SECTION;
CHILD;
CHILD ADVOCACY;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
FEMALE;
FETAL WELL BEING;
FETUS;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
MOTHER FETUS RELATIONSHIP;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANT WOMAN;
PRIVACY;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED KINGDOM;
UNITED STATES;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
BLOOD TRANSFUSION;
CESAREAN SECTION;
CHILD;
CHILD ADVOCACY;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
COERCION;
FEMALE;
FETAL VIABILITY;
FETUS;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MATERNAL-FETAL RELATIONS;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANT WOMEN;
PRIVACY;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
|
EID: 0038687246
PISSN: 10614982
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.18060/17727 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (6)
|
|
References (0)
|
