The impact of author-selected keywords on citation counts

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 1166-1177

  Uddin, Shahadat ^a   Khan, Arif ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Citation counts; Keyword diversity; Keyword growth; Network centrality

Indexed keywords

QUALITY CONTROL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

BETWEENNESS CENTRALITY; CITATION COUNTS; CO-OCCURRENCE NETWORKS; CORRELATION AND REGRESSION ANALYSIS; KEYWORD DIVERSITY; NETWORK CENTRALITIES; POTENTIAL CONTROL; STATISTICAL PROPERTIES;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 84992207309     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: 18755879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. ARC, Excellence in research in Auatralia (ERA). 2015 from http://www.arc.gov.au/era/.
2. Abbasi, A., Jaafari, A., Research impact and scholars’ geographical diversity. Journal of Informetrics 7:3 (2013), 683–692.
3. Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., Hossain, L., Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures. Journal of Informetrics 5:4 (2011), 594–607.
4. Abbasi, A., Hossain, L., Uddin, S., Rasmussen, K.J.R., Evolutionary dynamics of scientific collaboration networks: Multi-levels and cross-time analysis. Scientometrics 89:2 (2011), 687–710.
5. Anderson, D.L., Smart, W., Tressler, J., Evaluating research–peer review team assessment and journal based bibliographic measures: New Zealand PBRF research output scores in 2006. New Zealand Economic Papers 47:2 (2013), 140–157.
6. Biscaro, C., Giupponi, C., Co-authorship and bibliographic coupling network effects on citations. Public Library of Science, 9(6), 2014, e99502.
7. Bornmann, L., Schier, H., Marx, W., Daniel, H.-D., What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?. Journal of Informetrics 6:1 (2012), 11–18.
8. Boyack, K.W., Klavans, R., Predicting the importance of current papers. Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, Stockholm, Sweden, 2005.
9. Buter, R., van Raan, A.F., Non-alphanumeric characters in titles of scientific publications: An analysis of their occurrence and correlation with citation impact. Journal of Informetrics 5:4 (2011), 608–617.
10. Case, D.O., Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs and behavior. 2012, Emerald Group Publishing.
11. Choudhury, N., Uddin, S., Time-aware link prediction to explore network effects on temporal knowledge evolution. Scientometrics 108:2 (2016), 745–776.
12. Christakis, N.A., Fowler, J.H., The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine 357:4 (2007), 370–379.
13. Craig, I.D., Plume, A.M., McVeigh, M.E., Pringle, J., Amin, M., Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics 1:3 (2007), 239–248.
14. Cummins, S., Macintyre, S., Food environments and obesity—Neighbourhood or nation?. International Journal of Epidemiology 35:1 (2006), 100–104.
15. Day, R., Gastel, B., How to write and publish a scientific paper. 2012, Cambridge University Press.
16. Didegah, F., Thelwall, M., Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64:5 (2013), 1055–1064.
17. Duffy, R.D., Jadidian, A., Webster, G.D., Sandell, K.J., The research productivity of academic psychologists: Assessment, trends, and best practice recommendations. Scientometrics 89:1 (2011), 207–227.
18. Egghe, L., Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics 69:1 (2006), 131–152.
19. Falagas, M.E., Pitsouni, E.I., Malietzis, G.A., Pappas, G., Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal 22:2 (2008), 338–342.
20. Field, A., Discovering statistics using SPSS. 2009, Sage Publications Ltd.
21. Flesch, R., A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 1948, 221.
22. Garfield, E., Journal impact factor: A brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal 161:8 (1999), 979–980.
23. Garfield, E., The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of American Medical Association 295:1 (2006), 90–93.
24. Gazni, A., Didegah, F., Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: A case study of Harvard University's publications. Scientometrics 87:2 (2011), 251–265.
25. Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C.R., Didegah, F., Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63:2 (2012), 323–335.
26. Gazni, A., Are the abstracts of high impact articles more readable? Investigating the evidence from top research institutions in the world. Journal of Information Science 37:3 (2011), 273–281.
27. Gilbert, G.N., Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 1977, 113–122.
28. Grimpe, C., Hussinger, K., Formal and informal knowledge and technology transfer from academia to industry: Complementarity effects and innovation performance. Industry and Innovation 20:8 (2013), 683–700.
29. Hartley, J., Sotto, E., Pennebaker, J., Style and substance in psychology are influential articles more readable than less influential ones?. Social Studies of Science 32:2 (2002), 321–334.
30. Haslam, N., Ban, L., Kaufmann, L., Loughnan, S., Peters, K., Whelan, J., et al. What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics 76:1 (2008), 169–185.
31. Hirsch, J.E., An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102:46 (2005), 16569–16572.
32. Khan, A., Choudhury, N., Uddin, S., Hossain, L., Baur, L., Longitudinal trends in global obesity research and collaboration: A review using bibliometric metadata. Obesity Reviews 17:4 (2016), 377–385.
33. Kostoff, R.N., The difference between highly and poorly cited medical articles in the journal Lancet. Scientometrics 72:3 (2007), 513–520.
34. Lawrence, S., Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact. Nature, 411(6837), 2001 521–521.
35. Lee, P.-C., Su, H.-N., Investigating the structure of regional innovation system research through keyword co-occurrence and social network analysis. Innovation 12:1 (2010), 26–40.
36. Letchford, A., Moat, H.S., Preis, T., The advantage of short paper titles. Royal Society Open Science, 2(8), 2015, 150266.
37. Letchford, A., Preis, T., Moat, H.S., The advantage of simple paper abstracts. Journal of Informetrics 10:1 (2016), 1–8.
38. Matsuo, Y., Ishizuka, M., Keyword extraction from a single document using word co-occurrence statistical information. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 13:01 (2004), 157–169.
39. McGrail, M.R., Rickard, C.M., Jones, R., Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research & Development 25:1 (2006), 19–35.
40. MeSH (2014). United States National Library of Medicine. 10.1155/2014/920985.
41. Merton, R.K., The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. 1973, University of Chicago press.
42. Mryglod, O., Kenna, R., Holovatch, Y., Berche, B., Comparison of a citation-based indicator and peer review for absolute and specific measures of research-group excellence. Scientometrics 97:3 (2013), 767–777.
43. Nadim, A., How to write a scientific paper?. ASJOG 2 (2005), 255–258.
44. Peters, H., van Raan, A.F., On determinants of citation scores: A case study in chemical engineering. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45:1 (1994), 39–49.
45. Sooryamoorthy, R., Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications. Scientometrics 81:1 (2009), 177–193.
46. Stremersch, S., Verniers, I., Verhoef, P.C., The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact. Journal of Marketing 71:3 (2007), 171–193.
47. Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship?. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66:5 (2015), 876–889.
48. Uddin, S., Hossain, L., Abbasi, A., Rasmussen, K., Trend and efficiency analysis of co-authorship network. Scientometrics 90:2 (2012), 687–699.
49. Uddin, S., Hossain, L., Rasmussen, K., Network effects on scientific collaborations. Public Library of Science, 8(2), 2013, e57546.
50. Uddin, S., Khan, A., Baur, L.A., A framework to explore the knowledge structure of multidisciplinary research fields. Public Library of Science, 10(4), 2015, e0123537.
51. Vanclay, J.K., Factors affecting citation rates in environmental science. Journal of Informetrics 7:2 (2013), 265–271.
52. Vanni, T., Mesa-Frias, M., Sanchez-Garcia, R., Roesler, R., Schwartsmann, G., Goldani, M.Z., et al. International scientific collaboration in HIV and HPV: A network analysis. Public Library of Science, 9(3), 2014, e93376.
53. Wasserman, S., Faust, K., Social network analysis: Methods and applications. 2003, University Press, Cambridge, Cambridge.
54. Zhang, K., Xu, H., Tang, J., Li, J., Keyword extraction using support vector machine. Advances in web-age information management. 2006, Springer, 85–96.