Are policy incentives for solar power effective? Evidence from residential installations in the Northeast

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 81, Issue , 2017, Pages 132-151

  Lasco Crago, Christine ^a   Chernyakhovskiy, Ilya ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Incentives for solar PV; Renewable energy policies; Solar PV

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; CRASHWORTHINESS; HOUSING; HYBRID VEHICLES; SOLAR ENERGY;

BACK-OF-THE-ENVELOPE CALCULATIONS; CAPACITY ADDITIONS; DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS; ELECTRICITY PRICES; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; RENEWABLE ENERGY POLICY; SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAICS; SOLAR PVS;

SOLAR POWER GENERATION;

DEMOGRAPHY; EMISSIONS TRADING; INSTALLATION; PANEL DATA; PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM; POLICY MAKING; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SOLAR POWER;

EID: 84992028253     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: 10960449     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2016.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Andreoni, J., Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Econ. J. 100 (1990), 464–477.
2. Angrist, J.D., Pischke, J.S., Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. 2008, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
3. Baker, E., Fowlie, M., Lemoine, D., Reynolds, S.S., The economics of solar electricity. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 5 (2013), 387–426.
4. Barbose, G., Darghouth, N., Wiser, R., 2012. Tracking the Sun V an historical sum-mary of the installed price of photovoltaics in the United States from 1998 to 2011. Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
5. Bauner, C., Crago, C.L., Adoption of residential solar power under uncertainty: implications for renewable energy incentives. Energy Policy 86 (2015), 27–35.
6. Bollinger, B., Gillingham, K., Peer effects in the diffusion of solar photovoltaic panels. Mark. Sci. 31 (2012), 900–912.
7. Borenstein, S., 2008. The market value and cost of solar photovoltaic electricity production. Center for the Study of Energy Markets, University of California Energy Institute, Berkeley, CA.
8. Branker, K., Pathak, M., Pearce, J.M., A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15 (2011), 4470–4482.
9. Burr, C., 2014. Subsidies, tariffs and investments in solar power market. Available at: (http://spot.colorado.edu).
10. Cameron, A.C., Trivedi, P.K., Microeconometrics Using Stata. 2010, Stata Press College Station, TX.
11. Carley, S., State renewable energy electricity policies: an empirical evaluation of effectiveness. Energy Policy 37 (2009), 3071–3081.
12. Costa, D.L., Kahn, M.E., Energy conservation ?nudges? and environmentalist ideology: evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 11 (2013), 680–702.
13. Cragg, M.I., Zhou, Y., Gurney, K., Kahn, M.E., Carbon geography: the political economy of congressional support for legislation intended to mitigate greenhouse gas production. Econ. Inq. 51 (2013), 1640–1650.
14. Dastrup, S.R., Graff Zivin, J., Costa, D.L., Kahn, M.E., Understanding the solar home price premium: electricity generation and green social status. Eur. Econ. Rev. 56 (2012), 961–973.
15. Delmas, M., Montes-Sancho, M.J., Shimshack, J.P., Information disclosure policies: evidence from the electricity industry. Econ. Inq. 48 (2010), 483–498.
16. Dong, C., Wiser, R., Rai, V., Incentive Pass-through for Residential Solar Systems in California. 2014, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA.
17. DSIRE, 2013. Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency. Available at (http://www.dsireusa.org).
18. Gallagher, K.S., Muehlegger, E., Giving green to get green? Incentives and consumer adoption of hybrid vehicle technology. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 61:1 (2011), 1–15.
19. GTM Research and Solar Energy Industries Association, 2015. US Solar Market Insight (TM): 2015 Q3 (Executive Summary). Available at (http://www.seia.org/research-resources/solar-market-insight-2015-q3).
20. Hausman, J.A., Individual discount rates and the purchase and utilization of energy-using durables. Bell J. Econ. 10 (1979), 33–54.
21. Hettinga, W., Junginger, H., Dekker, S., Hoogwijk, M., McAloon, A., Hicks, K.B., Understanding the reductions in US corn ethanol production costs: an experience curve approach. Energy Policy 37 (2009), 190–203.
22. Hitaj, C., Wind power development in the United States. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 65 (2013), 394–410.
23. Hughes, J.E., Podolefsky, M., Getting green with solar subsidies: evidence from the california solar initiative. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2 (2015), 235–275.
24. Interagency Working Group, 2015. Technical update of the social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis under executive order 12866. Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon, United States Government. Available at: (https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/inforeg/scc-tsd-final-july-2015.pdf).
25. Jordan, D.C., Kurtz, S.R., Photovoltaic degradation rates: an analytical review. Prog. Photovolt.: Res. Appl. 21 (2013), 12–29.
26. Kahn, M.E., Do greens drive hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 54:2 (2007), 129–145.
27. Krasko, V.A., Doris, E., State distributed PV policies: can low cost (to government) policies have a market impact?. Energy Policy 59:2 (2013), 172–181.
28. Kwan, C.L., Influence of local environmental, social, economic and political variables on the spatial distribution of residential solar PV arrays across the United States. Energy Policy 47:2 (2012), 332–344.
29. Lopez, A., Roberts, B., Heimiller, D., Blair, N., Porro, G., U.S. renewable energy technical potentials: a GIS-based analysis. Contract 303 (2012), 275–300.
30. MassCEC, 2013. Commonwealth Solar II. Available at (http://www.masscec.com/index.cfm/page/Commonwealth-Solar-II-Block-13/cdid/14431/pid/11161).
31. National Atlas of the United States, 2009. 2008 Presidential General Election, County Results. Available at (http://www.nationatlas.gov).
32. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2009. National PV Cost Values. Available at (http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/pdfs/national_cost_benchmarks_report.pdf).
33. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2013a. Dynamic Maps, GIS Data, and Analysis Tools. Available at (http://www.nrel.gov/gis/data_solar.html).
34. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2013b. Open PV Project. Available at (http://openpv.nrel.gov).
35. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2014. The Effectiveness of State-Level Policies on Solar Market Development in Different State Contexts. Available at (http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/61029.pdf).
36. Noll, D., Dawes, C., Rai, V., Solar community organizations and active peer effects in the adoption of residential PV. Energy Policy 67 (2014), 330–343.
37. Sarzynski, A., Larrieu, J., Shrimali, G., The impact of state financial incentives on market deployment of solar technology. Energy Policy 46 (2012), 550–557.
38. Schelly, C., Residential solar electricity adoption: what motivates, and what matters? a case study of early adopters. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2 (2014), 183–191.
39. Sexton, S.E., Sexton, A.L., Conspicuous conservation: the prius halo and willingness to pay for environmental bona fides. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 67:3 (2014), 303–317.
40. Sexton, S.E., Sexton, A.L., 2011. Conspicuous conservation: the prius effect and willingness to pay for environmental bona fides. The Selected Works of Steven E. Sexton, pp. 1–26.
41. Sidiras, D.K., Koukios, E.G., Solar systems diffusion in local markets. Energy Policy 32:3 (2004), 2007–2018.
42. U.S. Census Bureau, 2012. American FactFinder, A Service of the American Community Survey. Available at (http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml).
43. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2013. Electric Power Annual, Average Price by State by Provider (EIA-861). Available at (http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/state/).
44. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2015a. Direct Federal Financial Interventions and Subsidies in Energy in Fiscal Year 2013. Available at (https://www.eia.gov/analysis/requests/subsidy/).
45. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2015b. Total Electric Power Industry Summary Statistics, Year-to-Date 2015 and 2014. Available at (http://www.eia.gov/electricity).
46. Van Benthem, A., Gillingham, K., Sweeney, J., Learning-by-doing and the optimal solar policy in California. Energy J., 2008, 131–151.
47. Wiser, R., Barbose, G., Holt, E., Supporting solar power in renewables portfolio standards: experience from the United States. Energy Policy 39 (2011), 3894–3905.
48. Wooldridge, J.M., Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. 2010, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
49. Yin, H., Powers, N., Do state renewable portfolio standards promote in-state renewable generation. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 1140–1149.
50. Zahran, S., Brody, S.D., Vedlitz, A., Lacy, M.G., Schelly, C.L., Greening local energy: explaining the geographic distribution of household solar energy use in the United States. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 74 (2008), 419–434.