The economics of solar electricity

Annual Review of Resource Economics

Volumn 5, Issue , 2013, Pages 387-426

  Baker, Erin ^a   Fowlie, Meredith ^b   Lemoine, Derek ^c   Reynolds, Stanley S ^c  

^a University of Massachusetts Amherst   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Electricity; Emissions; Intermittency; Learning; Photovoltaic; Solar

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886917148     PISSN: 19411340     EISSN: 19411359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-resource-091912-151843     Document Type: Article

References (121)

1. AnadonLD,BunnM,ChanG,ChanM, JonesC, et al.2011. TransformingUSenergy innovation.Tech.Rep.,Energy Technol. Innov. Policy Res. Group, Belfer Cent. Sci. Int. Aff., Kennedy Sch.,Harvard Univ., Cambridge,Mass.
2. Anderson D, Winne S. 2004. Modelling innovation and threshold effects in climate change mitigation.Work. Pap. 59, Tyndall Cent. Clim. Change Res., Univ. East Anglia, Norwich, UK
3. Argote L, Epple D. 1990. Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247:920-24
4. Arrow KJ. 1962. The economic implications of learning-by-doing. Rev. Econ. Stud. 29:155-73
5. Baker E, Chon H, Keisler J. 2009. Advanced solar R & D: combining economic analysis with expert elicitations to inform climate policy. Energy Econ. 31:S37-49
6. Baker E, Solak S. 2011. Climate change and optimal energy technology R & D policy. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 213:442-54
7. Baker E, Solak S. 2013. Management of energy technology for sustainability: how to fund energy technology R & D. Prod. Oper. Manag. In press
8. Barbose G, Darghouth N, Wiser R. 2012. Tracking the sun. V. The installed cost of photovoltaics in the United States from 1998 to 2009. Tech. Rep. LBNL-5919E, Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab., Berkeley, Calif.
9. Barbose GL, Darghouth N, Wiser R, Steel J. 2011. Tracking the sun. IV. An historical summary of the installed cost of photovoltaics in the United States from 1998 to 2010. Tech. Rep. LBNL-5047E, Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab., Berkeley, Calif.
10. Bibas R, Méjean A. 2012. Potential and limitations of bioenergy options for low carbon transitions. Work. Pap. 42-2012, Cent. Int. Rech. Environ. Dév. (CIRED), Nogent-sur-Marne, Fr.
11. Bollinger P,Gillingham K. 2012. Peer effects in the diffusion of solar photovoltaic panels. J. Mark. Sci. 31:900-12
12. Borenstein S. 2008. The market value and cost of solar photovoltaic electricity production. Work. Pap. 176, Cent. Stud. Energy Mark., Univ. Calif. Energy Inst., Berkeley, Calif.
13. Borenstein S. 2012. The private and public economics of renewable electricity generation. J. Econ. Perspect. 26(1):67-92
14. Bosetti V, Carraro C, Galeotti M, Massetti E, TavoniM. 2006. WITCH-A World Induced Technical Change Hybrid model. Energy J. 27:13-37
15. Bosetti V, Catenacci M, Fiorese G, Verdolini E. 2012. The future prospect of PV and CSP solar technologies: an expert elicitation survey. Energy Policy 49:308-17
16. Bosetti V, Massetti E, Tavoni M. 2007. The WITCH model. Structure, baseline, solutions. Work. Pap. 2007.010, Fond. Eni Enrico
17. Mattei Bosetti V, Tavoni M, De Cian E, Sgobbi A. 2009. The 2008 WITCH model: new model features and baseline. Work. Pap. 2009.085, Fond. Eni Enrico
18. Mattei Branker K, Pathak M, Pearce J. 2011. A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15:4470-82
19. Broekhoff D. 2007. Guidelines for quantifyingGHGreductions from grid-connected electricity projects. Rep., World Resour. Inst., Washington, DC
20. Bryan WL, Harter N. 1899. Studies on the telegraphic language: the acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. Psychol. Rev. 6:345-75
21. Bushnell J. 2005. Electricity resource adequacy: matching policies and goals. Electr. J. 18:11-21
22. Callaway D, Fowlie M, McCormick G. 2013. Marginal benefits of renewable energy generation: location, location, location? Unpubl. Manuscr., Univ. Calif., Berkeley
23. Clarke L, Weyant J, Birky A. 2006. On the sources of technological change: assessing the evidence. Energy Econ. 28:579-95
24. Cullen J. 2012. Measuring the environmental benefits of wind-generated electricity.Work. Pap., Harvard Univ. Cent. Environ.
25. Curtright A, Morgan MG, Kieth D. 2008. Expert assessment of future photovoltaic technology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42:9031-38
26. de Vries BJ, van Vuuren DP, Hoogwijk MM. 2007. Renewable energy sources: their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: an integrated approach. Energy Policy 35:2590-610
27. Deane J, Gallachoir BO, McKeogh E. 2010. Techno-economic review of existing and new pumped hydro energy storage plant. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14:1293-302
28. Denholm P, Margolis R. 2007. Evaluating the limits of solar photovoltaics (PV) in traditional electric power systems. Energy Policy 35:2852-61
29. Dep. Energy (DOE). 2012. SunShot Vision Study. Washington, DC: DOE Dosi G. 1988. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. J. Econ. Lit. 26:1120-71
30. Dunn B, Kamath H, Tarascon JM. 2011. Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices. Science 334:928-35
31. Dutton JM, Thomas A. 1984. Treating progress functions as a managerial opportunity. Acad. Manag. Rev. 9:235-47
32. Edenhofer O, Knopf B, Barker T, Baumstark L, Bellevrat E, et al. 2010. The economics of low stabilization: model comparison of mitigation strategies and costs. Energy J. 31:11-48
33. US Energy Inf. Admin. (EIA). 2010. Annual energy outlook 2010. Rep. DOE/EIA-0383(2010), EIA, Washington, DC
34. Freeman C, Perez C. 1988. Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles, and investment behavior. In Technical Change and Economic Theory, ed.
35. G Dosi, C Freeman, R Nelson, G Silverberg, L Soete, pp. 38-66. London: Pinter
36. GE Energy. 2008. Analysis of wind generation impact on ERCOT ancillary services requirements. Rep. for Electr. Reliab. Counc. Tex.
37. Gil H, Joos G. 2007. Generalized estimation of average displaced emissions by wind generation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22:1035-43
38. Goetzberger A, Hebling C. 2000. Photovoltaic materials, past, present, future. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 62:1-19
39. Goodrich A, James T, Woodhouse M. 2012. Residential, commercial, and utility-scale photovoltaic (PV) system prices in the United States: current drivers and cost-reduction opportunities. Tech. Rep. NREL/TP- 6A20-53347, Natl. Renew. Energy Lab., Washington, DC
40. GowrisankaranG, Reynolds S, SamanoM. 2013. Intermittency and the value of renewable energy. Tech. Rep., Natl. Bur. Econ. Res., Cambridge, Mass.
41. Green M, Emery K, King D, Igari S, Warta W. 2001. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 17). Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 9:49-56
42. Green Tech Media 2012. Polysilicon prices hit record low in 2011; will head even lower, enabling 0.70/W PV in 2012. Green Tech Media, Feb. 10. http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/polysilicon-prices-hit-record-lows- in-2011-will-head-even-lower-enabling-0/
43. Greenstone M, Kopits E, Wolverton A. 2011. Estimating the social cost of carbon for use in US federal rulemakings: a summary and interpretation.Work. Pap. 16913, Natl. Bur. Econ. Res., Cambridge, Mass.
44. Grübler A, Nakicenovic N, Victor DG. 1999. Modeling technological change: implications for the global environment. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 24:545-69
45. Halme J. 2002. Dye-sensitized nanostructured and organic photovoltaic cells: technical review and preliminary tests. Master's thesis, Helsinki Univ. Technol.
46. Hansen T. 2007. Utility solar generation valuation methods. Rep., DOE Sol. Am. Initiat., Washington, DC
47. Harmon C. 2000. Experience curves of photovoltaic technology. Tech. Rep. IR-00-014, Int. Inst. Appl. Syst. Anal., Laxenburg, Austria Hoff T, Perez R. 2010. Quantifying PV power output variability. Sol. Energy 84:1782-93
48. Hoff T, Perez R, Ross JP, Taylor M. 2008. Photovoltaic capacity valuation methods. Tech. Rep., Sol. Electr. Power Assoc., Washington, DC
49. Hoffert MI, Caldeira K, Benford G, Criswell DR, Green C, et al. 2002. Advanced technology paths to global climate stability: energy for a greenhouse planet. Science 298:981-87
50. Hoogwijk MM. 2004. On the global and regional potential of renewable energy sources. PhD thesis, Utrecht Univ.
51. Horbach J. 2007. Determinants of environmental innovation-new evidence from German panel data sources. Res. Policy 37:163-73
52. Hourcade JC, Jaccard M, Bataille C, Ghersi F. 2006. Hybrid modeling: new answers to old challenges- introduction to the special issue of the Energy Journal. Energy J. 27:1-11
53. Jamasb T, Kohler J. 2007. Learning curves for energy technology: a critical assessment. Work. Pap., Electr. Policy Res. Group, Univ. Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
54. Joskow P. 2011. Comparing the costs of intermittent and dispatchable electricity generating technologies. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:238-41
55. Kaffine DT, McBee BJ, Lieskovsky J. 2013. Emissions savings from wind power generation in Texas. Energy J. 34:155-75
56. Kalowekamo J, Baker E. 2009. Estimating the manufacturing cost of purely organic solar cells. Sol. Energy 83:1224-31
57. Kelly H, Weinberg C. 1993. Utility strategies for using renewables. In Renewable Energy: Sources for Fuels and Electricity, ed. T Johansson, H Kelly, A Reddy, R Williams, pp. 1011-68. Washington, DC: Island
58. Kolstad C. 1998. Integrated assessment modeling of climate change. In Economics and Policy Issues in Climate Change, ed. WD Nordhaus, pp. 263-86. Washington, DC: Resour. Future
59. Krey V, Clarke L. 2011. Role of renewable energy in climate mitigation: a synthesis of recent scenarios. Clim. Policy 11:1131-58
60. Lamont A. 2008. Assessing the long-Term system value of intermittent electric generation technologies. Energy Econ. 30:1208-31
61. Lemoine DM, Fuss S, Szolgayova J, Obersteiner M, Kammen DM. 2012. The influence of negative emission technologies and technology policies on the optimal climatemitigation portfolio.Clim.Change 113:141-62
62. Lew D, Piwko R. 2010. Western wind and solar integration study. Natl. Renew. Energy Lab., Golden, Colo. Little
63. R, Nowlan M. 1997. Crystalline silicon photovoltaics: the hurdle for thin films. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 5:309-15
64. Lorenz E, Scheidsteger T, Hurka J, Heinemann D, Kurz C. 2011. Regional PV power prediction for improved grid integration. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 19:757-71
65. Luderer G, Leimbach M,Bauer N, Kriegler E. 2011. Description of theReMIND-Rmodel. Potsdam Inst. Clim. Impact Res.
66. Madaeni S, Sioshansi R, Denholm P. 2012. Comparing capacity value estimation techniques for photovoltaic solar power. IEEE J. Photovolt. 3:407-15
67. Magné B, Kypreos S, Turton H. 2010. Technology options for low stabilization pathways with MERGE. Energy J. 31:83-107
68. Marquez R, Coimbra CF. 2011. Forecasting of global and direct solar irradiance using stochastic learning methods, ground experiments and the NWS database. Sol. Energy 85:746-56
69. Masui T, Ashina S, Fujino J. 2010. Analysis of 4.5 W/m2 stabilization scenarios with renewable energies and advanced technologies using AIM/CGE[Global] model. AIM Team, Natl. Inst. Environ. Stud., Jpn.
70. Mathiesen P, Kleissl J. 2011. Evaluation of numerical weather prediction for intra-day solar forecasting in the continental United States. Sol. Energy 85:967-77
71. McDonald A, Schrattenholzer L. 2001. Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy 29:255-61
72. McJeon HC, Clarke L, Kyle P, Wise M, Hackbarth A, et al. 2011. Technology interactions among low-carbon energy technologies: What can we learn from a large number of scenarios? Energy Econ. 33:619-31
73. Meyer T. 1996. Solid state nanocrystalline titanium oxide photovoltaic cells. PhD thesis, Dep. Chim., EPFL, Lausanne
74. Miketa A, Schrattenholzer L. 2004. Experiments with a methodology to model the role of R & D expenditures in energy technology learning processes: first results. Energy Policy 32:1679-92
75. Mills A, Wiser R. 2010. Implications of wide-Area geographic diversity for short-Term variability of solar power. Rep. LBNL-3884E, Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab., Berkeley, Calif.
76. Mills A, Wiser R. 2012a. Changes in the economic value of variable generation at high penetration levels: a pilot case study of California. Rep. LBNL-5445E, Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab., Berkeley, Calif.
77. Mills A, Wiser R. 2012b. An evaluation of solar valuation methods used in utility planning and procurement processes. Rep. LBNL-5933E, Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab., Berkeley, Calif.
78. Morgan MG, Henrion M. 1990. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
79. Mowery D, Rosenberg N. 1979. The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies. Res. Policy 8:102-53
80. Nagy B, Farmer JD, Bui QM, Trancik JE. 2012. Statistical basis for predicting technological progress. arXiv:1207-1463 [physics.soc-ph]
81. Natl. Res. Counc. 2007. Prospective Evaluation of Applied Energy Research and Development at DOE (Phase Two). Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
82. Navigant Consult. 2006. A review of PV inverter technology cost and performance projections. Subcontract. Rep. NREL/SR-620-38771, Natl. Renew. Energy Lab., Washington, DC. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy06osti/38771.pdf
83. Neij L. 1997. Use of experience curves to analyse the prospects for diffusion and adoption of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy 25:1099-107
84. Nemet GF. 2006. Beyond the learning curve: factors influencing the cost reductions in photovoltaics. Energy Policy 34:3218-32
85. Nemet GF, Baker E. 2009. Demand subsidies versus R & D:comparing the uncertain impacts of policy on a precommercial low-carbon energy technology. Energy J. 30:49-80
86. Nemet GF, Kammen DM. 2007. US energy research and development: declining investment, increasing need, and the feasibility of expansion. Energy Policy 35:746-55
87. Nordhaus WD. 2009. The perils of the learning model for modeling endogenous technological change.Work. Pap. 14638, Natl. Bur. Econ. Res., Cambridge, Mass.
88. Novan K. 2012. Valuing the wind: renewable energy policies and air pollution avoided. Work. Pap., Cent. Energy Environ. Econ., Univ. Calif., Davis
89. O'Neill B, Grübler A, Nakicenovic N, ObersteinerM,Riahi K, et al. 2003. Planning for future energy resources. Science 300:581-84
90. Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev. (OECD)/Int. Energy Agency (IEA). 2000. Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy. Paris: OECD/IEA
91. Osborne M. 2010. Manufacturing cost per watt at First Solar falls to US0.76 cents: Module faults hit earnings.PV-Tech,July29.http://www.pv-Tech.org/ news/manufacturing-cost-per-watt-At-first-solar-falls-To-us0.76-cents-module-fau
92. Pacala S, Socolow R. 2004. Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305:968-72
93. Paltsev S, Reilly JM, Jacoby HD, Morris JF. 2009. The cost of climate policy in the United States. Energy Econ. 31:S235-43
94. Perez R, Kivalov S, Schlemmer J, Hemker K Jr, Renné D, Hoff TE. 2010. Validation of short and medium term operational solar radiation forecasts in the US. Sol. Energy 84:91-137
95. Perez R, Margolis R, Kmiecik M, Schwab M, Perez M. 2006. Update: Effective load-carrying capability of photovoltaics in the United States. Conf. Pap.NREL/CP-620-40068, Natl. Renew. Energy Lab., Washington, DC
96. Pietzcker R, Manger S, Bauer N, Luderer G, Bruckner T. 2009. The role of concentrating solar power and photovoltaics for climate protection. Presented at IAEE Eur. Conf., 10th, Vienna
97. Prins G, Rayner S. 2007. Time to ditch Kyoto. Nature 449:973-75
98. Requate T. 2005. Dynamic incentives by environmental policy instruments-A survey. Ecol. Econ. 54:175-95
99. Riahi K, Rao S, Krey V, Cho C, Chirkov V, et al. 2011. RCP 8.5-A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Clim. Change 109:33-57
100. RothlederM, Helman U, Loutan C, Guo T, Xie J, Ventakaraman S. 2012. Integration of wind and solar under a 20% RPS: stochastic simulation methods and results from California ISO studies. Presented at IEEE Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meet., July, pp. 1-8
101. Schaeffer G, Seebregts A, Beurskens L, de Moor H, Alsema E, et al. 2004. Learning from the sun; analysis of the use of experience curves for energy policy purposes: the case of photovoltaic power. Final report of the PHOTEX project. Rep. ECN-C-04-035, ECN, Petten, Neth.
102. Shaalan H. 2003. Generation of electric power. In Handbook of Electric Power Calculations, ed. HW Beaty, 8:1-38. New York: McGraw-Hill
103. Shiao MJ. 2012. Thin film 2012-2016: technologies, markets and strategies for survival. Rep., GTM Res., Boston. http://www.greentechmedia.com/research/ report/thin-film-2012-2016
104. Silva Herran D. 2012. Renewable energy potential model manual (solar, wind). Vers. of 2012/01/16, Sustain. Soc. Syst. Sect., Cent. Soc.Environ.Syst.Res.,NIES.http://www-iam.nies.go.jp/aim/AIM-datalib/ RenewPotentialModel-AIM-Manual-20120116-1.pdf
105. Sioshansi R, Denholm P, Jenkin T. 2012. Market and policy barriers to deployment of energy storage. Econ. Energy Environ. Policy 1:47-63
106. Skoczek A, Sample T, Dunlop E. 2008. The results of performance measurements of field-Aged crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 17:227-40
107. Smestad G. 1994. Testing of dye-sensitized TiO2 solar cells. II. Theoretical voltage output and photoluminescence efficiencies. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 32:273-88
108. Stoft S. 2002. Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity. New York: Wiley-Intersci.
109. Sullivan P, Krey V, Riahi K. 2013. Impacts of considering electric sector variability and reliability in the MESSAGE model. Energy Strategy Rev. 1(3):157-63
110. Surek T. 2003. Progress in US photovoltaics: looking back 30 years and looking ahead 20. Proc. World Conf. Photovolt. Energy Convers., 3rd, May 18, 3:2507-12. Golden, CO: Natl. Renew. Energy Lab.
111. Tavoni M, De Cian E, Luderer G, Steckel J, Waisman H. 2012. The value of technology and of its evolution towards a low carbon economy. Clim. Change 114:39-57
112. Taylor M. 2008. Beyond technology-push and demand-pull: lessons from California's solar policy. Energy Econ. 30:2829-54
113. Thompson P. 2007. How much did the Liberty shipbuilders forget? Manag. Sci. 53:908-18
114. van Benthem A, Gillingham K, Sweeney J. 2008. Learning-by-doing and the optimal solar policy in California. Energy J. 29:131-51
115. van der Zwaan B, Rabl A. 2004. The learning potential of photovoltaics: implications for energy policy. Energy Policy 32:1545-54
116. van Sarka W, Brandsen G, Fleuster M, Hekkert M. 2007. Analysis of the silicon market: Will thin films profit? Energy Policy 35:3121-25
117. van Vuuren DP, van Ruijven B, Hoogwijk M, Isaac M, de Vries HJM. 2006. TIMER 2: Model description and application. In Integrated Modelling of Global Environmental Change. An Overview of IMAGE 2.4, ed. AF Bouwman, T Kram, K Klein Goldewijk, pp. 39-59.
118. Bilthoven: Neth. Environ. Assess. Agency Williams RH, Terzian G. 1993.Abenefit/cost analysis of accelerated development of photovoltaic technology. Tech. Rep. 281, Cent. Energy Environ. Stud., Princeton Univ.
119. Wright TP. 1936. Factors affecting the costs of airplanes. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 3:122-28
120. Yang CJ, Oppenheimer M. 2007. A "Manhattan project"for climate change? Clim. Change 80:199-204
121. Zweibel K. 1999. Issues in thin film PV manufacturing cost reduction. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 59:1-18