Social Media Experiences at County Level: The Case of the State of Mexico

Public Administration and Information Technology

Volumn 11, Issue , 2016, Pages 279-295

  Sandoval Almazán, Rodrigo ^a   Núñez Armas, Juan Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DEL ESTADO DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Cities; Facebook; Mixed research; Smart; Social media; Twitter

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991757731     PISSN: 25121812     EISSN: 25121839     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_15     Document Type: Chapter

References (63)

1. Agostino, D. (2013). Using social media to engage citizens: A study of Italian municipalities. Public Relations Review, 39, 232–234. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.02.009.
2. Alfano, G. (2011). Adapting bureaucracy to the Internet. The case of Venice Local Government. Information Polity, 16, 5–22.
3. Asgarkhani, M. (2005). The effectiveness of e-service in local government: A case study. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 3, 157–166.
4. Attour-Oueslati, A., Dufresne, D., & Longhi, C. (2007). The development of the local e-adminis-tration: Empirical evidences from the French case. Berlin: Springer.
5. Becker, J., Algermissen, L., & Niehaves, B. (2003). Processes in e-government focus: A procedure model for process oriented reorganisation in public administrations on the local level. In R. Traunmüller (Ed.), Electronic government: Second international conference, EGOV 2003, Prague, Czech Republic, September 2003. Proceedings, lecture notes in computer science (pp. 147–150). Berlin: Springer.
6. Bertot, J. C. (1998). Challenges and issues for public managers in the digital era. Public Manager, 27, 27.
7. Bochicchio, M. A., Celentano, M. G., & Longo, A. (2004). Innovation needs in the e-government scenario: A survey. In R. Traunmüller (Ed.), Electronic government, lecture notes in computer science (pp. 347–354). Berlin: Springer.
8. Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 123–132.
9. Brown, M. M. (2001). The benefits and costs of information technology innovations: An empirical assessment of a local government agency. Pubic Performance & Management Review, 24, 351–366.
10. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T. A., & Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS ’12. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 2289–2297. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2012.615.
11. Chun, S. A., Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Sandoval-Almazán, R. (2012). Collaborative e-government. Transforming Goverment: People, Process and Policy, 6, 5–12. doi:10.1108/17506161211214868.
12. Crano, W., & Marilynn, B. (2002). Principles and methods of social research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. De Saulles, M. (2011). Social media and local government in England: Who is doing what? Presented at the 11th European Conference on eGovernment (ECEG 2011), Academic Conference International Ltd., 2011, pp. 187–192.
14. Deb, G. K. (1999). Electronic governance—A vehicle for the new world order. Electronics Information & Planning, 27, 29–33.
15. Dobrev, B., Stoewer, M., Makris, L., & Getsova, E. (2002). E-MuniS—Electronic municipal information services—Best practice transfer and improvement project: Project approach and intermediary results. Berlin: Springer.
16. Flick, U. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.
17. Freeman, R. J. (2004). The Los Angeles county experience: A field study of information technology issues challenging local government. Journal of E-Government, 1, 93–101.
18. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Aldama-Nalda, A., (2013). Making a city smarter through information integration: Angel network and the role of political leadership. 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS 2013). pp. 1724–1733.
19. Griffin, D., & Halpin, E. (2005). An exploratory evaluation of UK local e-government from an accountability perspective. The Electronic Journal of E-Government, 3, 13–28.
20. Griffin, D., Trevorrow, P., & Halpin, E. (2006). Using SMS texting to encourage democratic participation by youth citizens: A case study of a project in an English local authority. The Electronic Journal of E-Government, 4, 63–70.
21. Ho, A. T. K. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62, 434–444.
22. Ho, A. T.-K., & Smith, J. F.( 2001). Information technology planning and the Y2K problem in local governments. American Review of Public Administration, 31, 158–180.
23. Holden, S. H., Norris, D. F., & Fletcher, P. D. (2003). Electronic government at the local level: Progress to date and future issues. Public Performance and Management Review, 26, 325–344.
24. Holland, C. P., & Cahill, M. (2006). 3G technology in local government: Case examples of business process change and strategic innovation. Mobile government consortium international LLC.
25. Hoogwout, M. (2002). Organizing for online service delivery: The effects of network technology on the organization of transactional service delivery in Dutch local government. Berlin: Springer.
26. Huerta-Carvajal, M. I., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2009). City boosterism through Internet marketing: An institutional perspective. In M. Gascó-Hernández & T. Torres-Coronas (Eds.), Information communication technologies and city marketing: Digital opportunities for cities around the world (pp. 130–151). Hershey: IGI Global.
27. INEGI. (2010). Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010 (Population and Households Census). http://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/olap/proyectos/bd/consulta.asp?p=17118&c=27769&s=est#.
28. Jacumeit, V. (2002). Administration 2000—Networking municipal front and back offices for one-stop government. Berlin: Springer.
29. Joo, I.-H., Kim, K.-S., & Kim, M.-S. (2004). Fire service in Korea: Advanced emergency 119 system based on GIS technology. Berlin: Springer.
30. Jorgensen, D. J., & Cable, S. (2002). Facing the challenges of e-goverment: A case study of the city of Corpus Christi, Texas. S. A. M. Advanced Management Journal, 67, 15–21.
31. Kim, H. J., & Bretschneider, S. (2004). Local government information technology capacity: An exploratory theory. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’04)—Track 5. Computer Societry Press, Island of Hawaii (Big Island), p. 50121b (1–10).
32. Klang, M., & Nolin, J. (2011). Disciplining social media: An analysis of social media policies in 26 Swedish municipalities. First Monday, 16, 1–21.
33. Koussouris, S., Charalabidis, Y., Gionis, G., Tsitsanis, T., & Psarras, J. (2007). Building a local administration services portal for citizens and businesses: Service composition, architecture and back-office interoperability issues. Berlin: Springer.
34. Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly (Selections from the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o2011)), 29, 446–454. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003.
35. Lodge, J. (2003). Towards an e-commonwealth? A tool for peace and democracy? Round Table, (372), 609–622.
36. Mainka, A., Hartmann, S., Stock, W. G., & Peters, I. (2014). Government and social media: A case study of 31 informational world cities. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS 2014). p. 10.
37. Meer, A. van der, & Winden, W. van (2003). E-governance in cities: A comparison of urban information and communication technology policies. Regional Studies, 37, 407–419.
38. Mergel, I. (2013a). Social media in the public sector: A guide to participation, collaboration and transparency in the networked world (1st ed.). Australia: Jossey-Bass.
39. Mergel, I. (2013b). Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. Federal Government. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 123–130. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.12.004.
40. Mossberger, K., Wu, Y., & Crawford, J. (2013). Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 351–358. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.016.
41. O’Toole Jr., L. J., Brown, M. M., & Brudney, J. L. (1998). Implementing information technology in government: An empirical assessment of the role of local partnerships. Journal of Public Administration, 8, 499–525.
42. Oliveira, G. H. M., & Welch, E. W. (2013). Social media use in local government: Linkage of technology, task, and organizational context. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 397–405. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.019.
43. Parvez, Z. (2003). Local democracy shaping e-democracy. In R. Traunmüller (Ed.), Electronic government: Second international conference, EGOV 2003, Prague, Czech Republic, September 2003. Proceedings, lecture notes in computer science (pp. 63–68). Berlin: Springer.
44. Pawlowska, A. (2002). Computing in Polish local administration—New technology, old experience. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government Democracy in the Information Age, 7, 49–64.
45. Pérez, M. D. C. C., De Rosario, A. H., Sáez Martín, A., Fernández, A., & Martínez-Monje, P. (2013). The Spanish smart cities and the social media. 7th International Conference on Methodologies, Technologies and Tools Enabling E-Government (MeTTeG 2013). pp. 11–20.
46. Raths, D. (2011). Cities add citizen engagement mobile apps to their portfolios. KM World, 20, 10–11.
47. Reddick, C. G. (2005). Citizen-initiated contacts with government: Comparing phones and websites. Journal of E-Government, 2, 27–53.
48. Richter, P., Cornford, J., & McLoughlin, I. (2004). The e-citizen as talk, as text and as technology: CRM and e-government. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 2, 207–218.
49. Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, R. (2008). E-government portals in Mexico. In A.-V. Anttiroiko (Ed.), Electronic government. Hershey: IGI Global.
50. Sandoval-Almazan, R., Mendoza-Colín, J., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Luna-Reyes, D. E. (2011). Local government websites: Cases of innovation and best practices in Mexico. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times. ACM, College Park, Maryland, pp. 349–350. doi:10.1145/2037556.2037620.
51. Scholl, H. J. (2006). Is e-government research a flash in the pan or here for the long shot? Berlin: Springer.
52. Sekiguchi, Y., & Andersen, K. V. (1999). Information systems in Japanese government[a]. Information Infrastructure and Policy, 6, 109.
53. Shah, B. P., & Lim, N. (2011). Using social media to increase e-government adoption in developing countries. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ICEGOV ’11. ACM, Tallinn, Estonia, pp. 205–213.
54. Stoica, V., & Ilas, A. (2009). Romanian urban e-government. Digital services and digital democracy in 165 cities. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 7, 171–182.
55. Thomson, C. S. (2002a). Enlisting on-line residents: Expanding the boundaries of e-government in a Japanese rural township. Government Information Quarterly, 19, 173–188.
56. Thomson, C. S. (2002b). Recruiting cyber townspeople: Local government and the Internet in a rural Japanese township. Technology in Society, 24, 349–360.
57. Walravens, N. (2013). The city as a service platform: A typology of city platform roles in mobile service provision. Proceedings of 19th Americas conference on Information System (AMCIS).
58. Walravens, N., & Ballon, P. (2011). The city as a platform: Exploring the potential role(s) of the city in mobile service provision through a mobile service platform typology. Presented at Tenth International Conference on Mobile Business (ICMB), pp. 60–67. doi:10.1109/ICMB.2011.22.
59. Weare, C., Musso, J. A., & Hale, M. L. (1999). Electronic democracy and the diffusion of municipal web pages in California. Administration & Society, 31, 3–27.
60. West, J. P., & Berman, E. M. (2001). The impact of revitalized management practices on the adoption of information technology: A national survey of local governments. Public Performance & Management Review, 24, 233–253.
61. Wohlers, T. E., & Bernier, L. (2012). Innovative city hall: A comparative case study of policy adoption in the U.S. and France. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9, 415–432.
62. Zavattaro, S. M., & Sementelli, A. J. (2014). A critical examination of social media adoption in government: Introducing omnipresence. Government Information Quarterly. doi:10.1016/j. giq.2013.10.007.
63. Zhou, L., & Wang, T. (2014). Social media: A new vehicle for city marketing in China. Cities, 37, 27–32. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2013.11.006.