Using social media to increase e-government adoption in developing countries

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 205-213

  Shah, Bimal Pratap ^a   Lim, Nena ^b  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Digital natives; E government; Facebook; Social media; Trust; YouTube

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL NATIVES; E-GOVERNMENT; FACEBOOK; SOCIAL MEDIA; TRUST; YOUTUBE;

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; INTERNET; WEBSITES;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 84855370449     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2072069.2072103     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (54)

1. Gil-García, J. R., and Luna-Reyes, L. F. 2003. Towards a definition of electronic government: A comparative review. A. Mendez-Vilas, J. A. Mesa-González, V. Guerrero-Bote, &B F. Zapico-Alonso (Eds.), Techno-legal aspects of information society and new economy: an Overview. Formatex, Badajoz.
2. Al-Shafi, S. and Weerakkody, V. 2008. The use of wireless Internet parks to facilitate adoption and diffusion of egovernment services: An empirical study in Qatar. Proceedings of the 14th AMCIS, Toronto, Ontario, 2008.
3. American Customer Satisfaction Index. 2005. Egovernment satisfaction index. DOI = http://fcg.nbc.gov/pdf/e-gov-comm-0305.pdf
4. Bellanger, F. and Carter, L. 2008. Trust and risk in egovernment adoption. Journal of Strategic Information systems 17, 165-176.
5. Srivastava, S. C. and Teo, T. S. H. 2009. Citizen trust development for e-government adoption and usage: Insights from young adults in Singapore. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 25, 359-378
6. Singh, N., Alhorr, H. S. and Bartikowski, B. P. 2010. Global e-commerce: A portal bridging the world markets. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 11, 1-6.
7. Rosenstone S. J. and Hansen, M. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York:Macmillan. New York: Macmillan.
8. Bach, R. and Kaufman, D. 2009. A social infrastructure for hometown security: Evolving the homeland security paradigm. CNA Corporation. DOI= http://www.dtic.mil/cgibin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD= ADA493507
9. Termeer, C.J.A.M., Pot, W.D., Breeman, G.E. and van- Lieshout. M. 2009. Trust, knowledge, and democracy: The public debate about Dutch mega-stables. Proceedings of international conference towards knowledge democracy. Consequences for Science, Politics and Media, 25-27 August, Leiden
10. Pilling, W. and Boeltzig, H. 2007. Moving towards egovernment -effective strategies for increasing access and use of the Internet among non-internet users in US and UK. Proceedings of 8th annual international digital government research conference, Philadelphia, USA.
11. Teerling, M. L. and Pieterson, W. 2009. Multi-channel marketing: An experiment on leading citizens to online public services. In The proceedings of the 10th International digital government research conference, May 2009, 17-20, Puebla, Mexico.
12. Ebbers, W.E., Pieterson, W. J., Noordman, H.N, Pietersona, W. J. and Noordmana, H.N. (2007). Electronic government: Rethinking channel management strategies. Government Information Quarterly 25, 181-201.
13. Raacke, J. and Bonds-Raacke, J. 2008. MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyber Psychology & Behavior 11, 169-174. (Pubitemid 351555927)
14. Nielsenwire. 2010. Led by Facebook, Twitter, global time spent on social media sites up 82% year over year. DOI= http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/ global/led-byfacebook-twitter-global-time-spent-on-social-media-sitesup-82-year- over-year/
15. Eisenberg, B. 2007. Understanding and aligning the value of social media Future Now's GrokDotCom /Marketing Optimization Blog." Future Now's Marketing Optimization Blog: GrokDotCom. DOI= http://www.grokdotcom.com/2008/11/ 07/understandingand-aligning-the-value-of-social-media/.
16. Landsbergen, D. 2010. Government as part of the revolution: Using social media to achieve public goals. Electronic Journal of E-Government 8, 134-146.
17. Skul, D. 2008. Social network marketing - The wave of the future. Relativity business technology solutions.
18. Prensky, M. 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 1-6.
19. Bayne, S. and Ross, J. 2007. The digital native and digital immigrant: a dangerous opposition. Proceedings of Annual Conference of the Society for Research into Higher Education, December 11-13.
20. Shah, N. and Abraham, S. Digital Natives with a Cause? The Centre for Internet & Society Report, DOI= April, 2010 from http://www.cisindia.org/ research/dn/uploads/dnrep1.
21. Ebrahim, Z. and Irani, Z. 2005. E-government adoption: architecture and barriers. Business Process Management Journal. 11, 589-611. (Pubitemid 41374242)
22. Bugler, D. T. and Bretschneider, S. 1993. Technology push or program pull: Interest in new information technologies within public organizations. In B. Bozeman (Ed.), Public Management: The State of the Art 275-293 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Reffat, R. 2003. Developing a successful e-Government. Working paper, school of architecture, design science and planning, University Of Sydney, Australia.
24. Fang, Z. 2002. E-Government in digital Era: Concept, practice and development. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Information 20, 193-213.
25. Darrell, W. 2002. U.S. State and federal e-Government full report, DOI= http://www.insidepolitics.org/egovt02us.pdf
26. Sampson, N. 2002. Bank marketing international: simplifying in (Form)ation Online. DOI= http://www.mandoforms.com/news/coverage/bankmarketing. html
27. Kurunananda, A. & Weerakkody, V. 2006. E-government implementation in Sri Lanka: Lessons from the UK, Proceedings of 8th International Information technology conference, Colombo, Sri Lanka, October
28. Bélanger, F. and Carter, L. 2006. The effects of the digital divide on e-government: An empirical evaluation. In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 4, 1-7.
29. McKnight, D. H. and Chervany, N. L. 2001-2002. What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6, 35-59.
30. Morgeson III, F. V., VanAmburg, D. and Mithas, S. 2010. Misplaced trust? Exploring the structure of the egovernment- citizen trust relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, DOI= http://www.terpconnect.umd. edu/~smithas/papers/morgesonetal2010jpart.pdf.
31. Teo, T. S. H., S. C. Srivastava and Jiang, L. 2008-9. Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems 25, 99-131.
32. Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C. and Moon, M., J. 2005. Linking citizen's satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15, 371-391. (Pubitemid 41350834)
33. Waters, D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A, and Lucas, J. 2009. Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using F T. S. Facebook. Public Relations Review 35, 102-106
34. Stephenson, D. and Bonabeau, E. 2007. Expecting the unexpected: The need for a networked terrorism and disaster response strategy. Homeland Security Affairs III, no. 1. DOI= http://www.hsaj.org/?article=3.1.3
35. Avidar, R. 2009. Social media, societal culture and Israeli public relations practice. Public Relations Review 35, 437-439
36. CIA. 2010. The world fact book. DOI= https://www.cia.gov/library/ publications/the-worldfactbook/geos/np.html
37. Bhattarai, K. and Gupta, M. K. 2008 Implementation of egovernment in Nepal: Prospects, opportunities and threats. The Second International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Cairo, Egypt, 483-484.
38. ADB. 2006. Road Connectivity project to server Nepal's poor. A quarterly newsletter of the Nepal resident mission of the Asian Development Bank. DOI= http://www.adb.org/Documents/Periodicals/NRM/vol6-no3.pdf
39. Parajuli, J. 2007. A content analysis of selected government web sites: A case study of Nepal. The Electronic Journal of E-Government 5, 87-94
40. Owen, M. 2004. The myth of digital natives. Future lab, June 2004.
41. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J. H. and Schoorman, F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20, 709-734.
42. Duck, S. 1997. The handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions. New York: Wiley
43. Kim, K. and Prabhakar, B. 1998. Initial trust, perceived risk, and adoption of Internet banking. In Proceedings of ICIS 2000, Brisbane, Australia, Dec. 10-13
44. Becerra, M. and Gupta, A. K. 1999. Trust within the organization: integrating the trust literature with agency theory and transaction costs economics. Public Administration Quarterly 23, 177-203
45. Carter, L. and Belanger, F. 2005.The utilization of Egovernment services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance Factors. Information Systems Journal 15, 5-25. (Pubitemid 40163171)
46. Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly 13, 319-340.
47. Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovation, 4th ed., The Free Press: New York.
48. Zucker, L. G. 1986. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920 Research in Organizational Behavior 8, 53-111.
49. Mishra, A. K. 1996. Organizational Responses to Crisis - The Centrality of Trust, □ Kramer, R. M. and Tyler, T. R.(eds.) Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research thousand oaks: Sage Publication, 261-287
50. Cummings, L. L. and P. Bromiley. 1996. The organizational trust inventory: OTI, R. Kramera and T. Tyler (eds.) Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 302-330
51. Sheppard, B. and D. Sherman. 1998. The Grammars of trust: A model and general implications. Academy of Management Review 23, 433-437.
52. Lim, N. 2003. Consumers' perceived risk: sources versus consequences, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2, 216-228.
53. Freed, L. 2003. American Customer Satisfaction Index: EGovernment Satisfaction Index, ForeSe Results report, 1-24, DOI= http://fcg.nbc.gov/ documents/ACSI-EGov-Report-Q4-20 08.pdf.
54. Mislove, A., Marcon, M., Gummadi, K. P., Druschel, P. and Bhattacharjee, B. 2007. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In Proceedings of IMC (San Diego, California), 24-26.