Hype among low-carbon technologies: Carbon capture and storage in comparison

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 41, Issue , 2016, Pages 124-141

  Martínez Arranz, Alfonso ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Carbon capture and storage; Climate policy; Hype; R D; Solar thermal power; Technology policy

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; MITIGATION; SOLAR POWER; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY POLICY;

EID: 84991729087     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (187)

1. 2) Steelmaking (ULCOS) program. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 55 (2016), 537–549.
2. AEMO, 100 Per Cent Renewables Study—Modelling Outcomes. 2013, Australian Energy Market Operator, Melbourne, AU.
3. 2) emission sources in Kuwait from the downstream industry: critical analysis with a current and futuristic view. Energy 81 (2015), 575–587.
4. Albino, V., Ardito, L., Dangelico, R.M., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Understanding the development trends of low-carbon energy technologies: a patent analysis. Appl. Energy 135 (2014), 836–854.
5. Anderson, D., Costs and finance of carbon abatement in the energy sector. Treasury, U., (eds.) Stern Review, 2006, UK Government, London.
6. Ashworth, P., Wade, S., Reiner, D., Liang, X., Developments in public communications on CCS. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 40:September (2015), 449–458.
7. Audin, L., Green power: how real is it?. Cogeneration Competitive Power J. 17 (2002), 59–63.
8. BIGCCS, BIGCCS Vision & Goals [Online]. 2013, Sintef, Trondheim http://bigccs.no/background/bigccs-vision-goals/ (accessed 04.09.15).
9. BNEF, New Energy Outlook. 2016, Bloomberg New Energy Finance.
10. Bakker, S., Van Lente, H., Meeus, M., Arenas of expectations for hydrogen technologies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 78 (2011), 152–162.
11. Bakker, S., Van Lente, H., Engels, R., Competition in a technological niche: the cars of the future. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 24 (2012), 421–434.
12. Bakker, S., The car industry and the blow-out of the hydrogen hype. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 6540–6544.
13. Banholzer, W.F., Practical limitations and recognizing hype. Energy Environ. Sci. 5 (2012), 5478–5480.
14. Bellona Europa, CCS: Solving the Climate Puzzle for Industry and Energy. 2014, Bellona, Oslo.
15. Bellona Foundation E3G & Zero Emissions Resource Organisation, Moving CCS Forward in Europe. 2013, ENGO Network on CCS, Oslo.
16. Blarke, M.B., Jenkins, B.M., SuperGrid or SmartGrid: competing strategies for large-scale integration of intermittent renewables?. Energy Policy 58 (2013), 381–390.
17. Bogdanov, D., Breyer, C., North-East Asian Super Grid for 100% renewable energy supply: optimal mix of energy technologies for electricity, gas and heat supply options. Energy Convers. Manage. 112 (2016), 176–190.
18. Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., Van Lente, H., The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 18 (2006), 285–298.
19. Boyd, A.D., Paveglio, T.B., Front page or buried beneath the fold? Media coverage of carbon capture and storage. Public Underst. Sci. 23 (2014), 411–427.
20. Brown, N., Hope against hype: accountability in biopasts presents and futures. Sci. Stud. 16 (2003), 3–21.
21. Bustreo, C., Development & Application of ETM Dissemination Strategies: Review and Update of the Power Sector. 2013, EURATOM Fusion Association/Consorcio RFX, Padova, Italy.
22. CSPPLAZA. 2016. Ivanpah Caught on Fire, and That's the Least of Its Problems. CSPPlaza, May (24). 2016.
23. Carrington, D. 2015. UK cancels pioneering £1bn carbon capture and storage competition. The Guardian, 26 November 2015.
24. Cheng, W., 2016. China Released the Feed-in Tariff for CSP Demonstration Projects. China National Solar Thermal Energy Alliance. URL: http://en.nafste.org/index.php?m=content&c=index&a=show&catid=6&id=490.
25. Corry, O., Reiner, D., Evaluating global Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) communication materials: a survey of global CCS communications. School, C.J.B., (eds.) Work Package 1, 2011, CSIRO publishing, Cambridge, MA, US.
26. Couture, T.D., Leidreiter, A., How to Achieve 100% Renewable Energy. 2014, World Future Council.
27. Czarnitzki, D., & Hussinger, K., 2004. The link between R&D subsidies, R&D spending and technological performance. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper.
28. Czisch, G., Scenarios for a Future Electricity Supply. Cost-Optimised Variations on Supplying Europe and Its Neighbours with Electricity from Renewable Energies. 2016, Institute of Engineering & Technology, Herts, UK.
29. DE Chant, T., 2015. The Power Plants That Can Reverse Climate Change. PBS Nova Next, 9 December 2015.
30. de Coninck, H., Bäckstrand, K., An international relations perspective on the global politics of carbon dioxide capture and storage. Global Environ. Change 21 (2011), 368–378.
31. DG Environment Com, 35 Winning the Battle Against Global Climate Change. 2005, European Commission, Brussels.
32. Danish Energy Agency, An Energy System Without Fossil Fuels Is Technically Possible [Online]. 2014, DEA, Copenhagen http://www.ens.dk/en/info/news-danish-energy-agency/energy-system-without-fossil-fuels-technically-possible (accessed 14.08.14).
33. Dixon, T., Trade, U.D.O.I.A., (eds.) UK Work on CCS and the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, 2006, UK Government, London.
34. US DoE, Carbon Capture. 2016 (Online]. Available: http://www.netl.doe.gov/research/coal/carbon-capture (Accessed 31.05.16).
35. Dosi, G., Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Policy 11 (1982), 147–162.
36. Duch-Brown, N., Costa-Campi, M.T., The diffusion of patented oil and gas technology with environmental uses: a forward patent citation analysis. Energy Policy 83 (2015), 267–276.
37. Duncan, O.D., Path analysis: sociological examples. Am. J. Sociol. 72 (1966), 1–16.
38. EIA, Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook. 2015, U.S. Energy Information Administration.
39. ENTSO-E, Pilot Ten-Year Network Development Plan. 2010, European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity, Brussels.
40. ENTSO-E, Ten-Year Network Development Plan. 2016, European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity, Brussels http://tyndp.entsoe.eu/.
41. Eccles, J.K., Pratson, L., A carbonshed assessment of small- vs. large-scale CCS deployment in the continental US. Appl. Energy 113 (2014), 352–361.
42. Eckhause, J., Herold, J., Using real options to determine optimal funding strategies for CO2 capture: transport and storage projects in the European Union. Energy Policy 66 (2014), 115–134.
43. Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Seyboth, K., Matschoss, P., Kadner, S., Zwickel, T., Eickemeier, P., Hansen, G., Schl Mer, S., Stechow, C.V., (eds.) IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation, 2011, Cambridge, UK, U.P, New Yor.
44. Ekins, P., Kesicki, F., Smith, A.Z.P., Marginal Abatement Cost Curves: A Call for Caution. 2011, UCL Energy Institute, London.
45. EPO. 2015, PATSTAT Online − Sample Queries and Tips.
46. Evar, B., Conditional inevitability: expert perceptions of carbon capture and storage uncertainties in the UK context. Energy Policy 39 (2011), 3414–3424.
47. Fergusson, I.F., FutureGen: a brief history and issues for congress. SERVICE, C.R., (eds.) CRS Report for Congress, 2008, US Congress, Washington, DC, US.
48. Fuss, S., Canadell, J.G., Peters, G.P., Tavoni, M., Andrew, R.M., Ciais, P., Jackson, R.B., Jones, C.D., Kraxner, F., Nakicenovic, N., LE Quere, C., Raupach, M.R., Sharifi, A., Smith, P., Yamagata, Y., Betting on negative emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 4 (2014), 850–853.
49. GCCSI, Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Demonstration in Developing Countries: Analysis of Key Policy Issues and Barriers. 2011, Global CCS Institute.
50. Geels, F.W., Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Co-Evolutionary and Socio-Technical Analysis. 2005, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
51. Gibbins, J., Chalmers, H., Preparing for global rollout: a ‘developed country first’ demonstration programme for rapid CCS deployment. Energy Policy 36 (2008), 501–507.
52. Glennie, J., Analysis of the Cash and Carbon Flows of Boundary Dam Coal-fired Power Station. 2015, Saskatchewan Community Wind (Saskwind), Saskatoon.
53. Greenpeace, Solarpaces and Estela, 2009. Concentrating Solar Power Global Outlook 09.
54. Groenenberg, H., De Coninck, H., Effective EU and member state policies for stimulating CCS. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2 (2008), 653–664.
55. Guston, D.H., Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: the role of the Office of Technology Transfer as a boundary organization. Soc. Stud. Sci. 29 (1999), 87–111.
56. Hansson, A., Bryngelsson, M., Expert opinions on carbon dioxide capture and storage—a framing of uncertainties and possibilities. Energy Policy 37 (2009), 2273–2282.
57. Hansson, A., Colonizing the future: the case of CCS. Markusson, N., Shackley, S., Evar, B., (eds.) The Social Dynamics of Carbon Capture and Storage: Understanding CCS Representations, Governance and Innovation, 2012, Routledge, Oxford, UK.
58. Haszeldine, R.S., Carbon capture and storage: how green can black Be?. Science 325 (2009), 1647–1652.
59. Hawkins, D., Peridas, G., Steelman, J., Twelve years after Sleipner: moving CCS from hype to pipe. Energy Procedia 1 (2009), 4403–4410.
60. Hertwich, E.G., Gibon, T., Bouman, E.A., Arvesen, A., Suh, S., Heath, G.A., Bergesen, J.D., Ramirez, A., Vega, M.I., Shi, L., Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112 (2015), 6277–6282.
61. 2 de Cubillos del Sil iniciará su actividad en 2011. El Mundo, 22 October 2010.
62. IEA & UNIDO, Carbon Capture and Storage in Industrial Applications. 2011, OECD Publishing House, Paris.
63. IEA, OPEC, OECD, BANK, Joint Report on Fossil-Fuel and Other Energy Subsidies: An Update of the G20 Pittsburgh and Toronto Commitments., 2011, IEA, OPEC, OECD, World Bank.
64. 2 Capture and Storage. 2004, OECD Publishing House, Paris.
65. IEA, Focus On Clean Coal. 2006, OECD, Paris.
66. IEA, CCS Technology Roadmap. 2009, OECD Publishing House, Paris.
67. IEA, IEA Guide to Reporting Energy RD&D Budget/Expenditure Statistics., 2011, OECD, Paris.
68. IEA, Energy Technology Perspectives : Pathways to a Clean Energy System. 2012, OECD Publishing House, Paris.
69. IEA, Carbon Capture and Storage: Technology Roadmap. 2013 edition, 2013, OECD Publishing House, Paris.
70. IEA, IEA Hails Historic Launch of Carbon Capture and Storage Project [Online]. 2014, OECD Publishing House, Paris Available: https://www.iea.org/newsroomandevents/pressreleases/2014/october/iea-hails-historic-launch-of-carbon-capture-and-storage-project.html (accessed 01.06.15).
71. IEA, Development Prospects of the ASEAN Power Sector. 2015, OECD, Paris.
72. IEA, Energy Technology Perspectives 2015: Mobilising Innovation to Accelerate Climate Action. 2015, OECD Publishing House, Paris.
73. IPCC, Summary for policymakers. Metz, B., Davidson, O., Coninck, H.D., Loos, M., Meyer, L., (eds.) IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, 2005, Cambridge, New York, UK, U.P.
74. Jaccard, M., Sharp, J., CCS in Canada. Meadowcroft, J., Langhelle, O., (eds.) Caching the Carbon: the Politics and Policy of Carbon Capture and Storage, 2011, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, Northhampton.
75. Jacobson, M.Z., Delucchi, M.A., Bazouin, G., Bauer, Z.A.F., Heavey, C.C., Fisher, E., Morris, S.B., Piekutowski, D.J.Y., Vencill, T.A., Yeskoo, T.W., 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) all-sector energy roadmaps for the 50 United States. Energy Environ. Sci. 8 (2015), 2093–2117.
76. Jarvenpaa, H., Makinen, S.J., Empirically detecting the Hype Cycle with the life cycle indicators: an exploratory analysis of three technologies Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2008. IEEM 2008. IEEE International Conference, On, 8–11 Dec, 2008, 12–16.
77. Jun, S.-P., A comparative study of hype cycles among actors within the socio-technical system: with a focus on the case study of hybrid cars. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 79 (2012), 1413–1430.
78. Kenarsari, S.D., Yang, D., Jiang, G., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Russell, A.G., Wei, Q., Fan, M., Review of recent advances in carbon dioxide separation and capture. RSC Adv. 3 (2013), 22739–22773.
79. Klein, D., Luderer, G., Kriegler, E., Strefler, J., Bauer, N., Leimbach, M., Popp, A., Dietrich, J.P., Humpen Der, F., Lotze-Campen, H., Edenhofer, O., The value of bioenergy in low stabilization scenarios: an assessment using REMIND-MAgPIE. Clim. Change 123 (2014), 705–718.
80. Konrad, K., Markard, J., Ruef, A., Truffer, B., Strategic responses to fuel cell hype and disappointment. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 79 (2012), 1084–1098.
81. Konrad, K., The social dynamics of expectations: the interaction of collective and actor-specific expectations on electronic commerce and interactive television. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 18 (2006), 429–444.
82. Krah, M., Heidug, W., Ward, J., Smale, R., From demonstration to deployment: an economic analysis of support policies for carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy 60 (2013), 753–763.
83. Krewitt, W., Simon, S., Graus, W., Teske, S., Zervos, A., Sch Fer, O., The 2 °C scenario—a sustainable world energy perspective. Energy Policy 35 (2007), 4969–4980.
84. Kriegler, E., Weyant, J.P., Blanford, G.J., Krey, V., Clarke, L., Edmonds, J., Fawcett, A., Luderer, G., Riahi, K., Richels, R., Rose, S.K., Tavoni, M., Van Vuuren, D.P., The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Clim. Change 123 (2014), 353–367.
85. 2 capture technology: a patent review. Appl. Energy 102 (2013), 1439–1447.
86. Lacey, S., Owner of first clean coal plant in US faces bankruptcy over soaring CCS costs. RenewEconomy, 20(August), 2015.
87. Lazard. 2014. Lazard's Levelised Cost of Energy Analysis. Versions 8.0.
88. Lazard. 2008–2015. Lazard's Levelised Cost of Energy Analysis. Versions 1. 0-9.0.
89. Lee, J.Y., Tan, R.R., Chen, C.L., A unified model for the deployment of carbon capture and storage. Appl. Energy 121 (2014), 140–148.
90. Leung, D.Y.C., Caramanna, G., Maroto-Valer, M.M., An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 39 (2014), 426–443.
91. Liang, Z.H., Rongwong, W., Liu, H., FU, K., Gao, H., Cao, F., Zhang, R., Sema, T., Henni, A., Sumon, K., Recent progress and new developments in post-combustion carbon-capture technology with amine based solvents. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 40 (2015), 26–54.
92. Lilliestam, J., Bielicki, J.M., Patt, A.G., Comparing carbon capture and storage (CCS) with concentrating solar power (CSP): potentials, costs, risks, and barriers. Energy Policy 47 (2012), 447–455.
93. 2 capture by metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41 (2012), 2308–2322.
94. 2 capture—a review. Energy Fuels 26 (2012), 2751–2767.
95. Lund, H., Mathiesen, B.V., The role of carbon capture and storage in a future sustainable energy system. Energy 44 (2012), 469–476.
96. 2 transport pipeline network. Appl. Energy 132 (2014), 610–620.
97. Lupion, M., Herzog, H.J., NER300: lessons learnt in attempting to secure CCS projects in Europe. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 19 (2013), 19–25.
98. MIT, Carbon Capture and Sequestration Project Database [Online]. 2015, MIT Press, Boston, MA, US Available: http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/boundary_dam.html (Accessed 22.07.15).
99. MIT, Boundary Dam Fact Sheet [Online]. 2016, MIT Press, Boston, MA, US Available: http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/boundary_dam.htm (accessed 13.05.16).
100. MIT, ESI CCS Project Fact Sheet [Online]. 2016, MIT Press, Boston, MA, US Available: https://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/esi_ccs.html (accessed 13.05.16).
101. 2 problem. Clim. Change 1 (1976), 59–68.
102. Margolis, R.M., Kammen, D.M., Evidence of under-investment in energy R&D in the United States and the impact of federal policy. Energy Policy 27 (1999), 575–584.
103. Markusson, N., Kern, F., Watson, J., Arapostathis, S., Chalmers, H., Ghaleigh, N., Heptonstall, P., Pearson, P., Rossati, D., Russell, S., A socio-technical framework for assessing the viability of carbon capture and storage technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 79 (2012), 903–918.
104. Markusson, N., Shackley, S., Evar, B., The Social Dynamics of Carbon Capture and Storage: Understanding CCS Representations, Governance and Innovation. 2012, Routledge, Oxford, UK.
105. Martínez Arranz, A., Carbon capture and storage: frames and blind spots. Energy Policy 82 (2015), 249–259.
106. Meadowcroft, J., Langhelle, O., The politics and policy of CCS: the uncertain road ahead. Meadowcroft, J., Langhelle, O., (eds.) Caching the Carbon: the Politics and Policy of Carbon Capture and Storage, 2011, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, Northhampton, MA, USA.
107. Metz, B., Davidson, O., Coninck, H.D., Loos, M., Meyer, L., IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage., 2005, Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, New York, U.P.
108. 2 capture and storage: variable electricity generation and fossil fuel power. Appl. Energy 108 (2013), 66–73.
109. Milligan, M., Ela, E., Hodge, B.-M., Kirby, B., Lew, D., Clark, C., Decesaro, J., Lynn, K., Cost-Causation and Integration Cost Analysis for Variable Generation Task No. WE110820. 2011, National Renewable Energy Laboratory and U.S. Department of Energy, Springfield,VA.
110. Monbiot, G., Heat: How to Stop the Planet from Burning. 2006, Allen Lane Penguin press, London.
111. NETL, FtureGen: Integrated Hydrogen, Electric Power Production and Carbon Sequestration Research Initiative. 2004, US Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory, Washington, DC, US.
112. NETL, NETL's Carbon Capture and Storage Database [Online]. 2015, Online: National Energy Technology Laboratory Available: http://www.netl.doe.gov/research/coal/carbon-storage/strategic-program-support/database (accessed 22.07.15).
113. NREL, System Advisor Model (SAM) Case Study: Andasol-1. 2013, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
114. NREL, Concentrating Solar Power Projects [Online]. 2016, US Department of Energy Available: http://www.nrel.gov/csp/solarpaces/ (accessed 25.05.16).
115. National coal council, Fossil Forward: Revitalizing CCS Bringing Scale and Speed to CCS Deployment. 2015, Fossil Forward.
116. Nykvist, B., Ten times more difficult: quantifying the carbon capture and storage challenge. Energy Policy 55 (2013), 683–689.
117. OAGN, Cost Management of CCS Must Be Improved [Online]. 2013, Office of the Auditor General of Norway, Oslo Available: https://www.riksrevisjonen.no/en/Formedia/PressReleases/Pages/CCS.aspx (accessed 15.01.15).
118. OECD, Climate and Carbon Aligning Prices and Policies. OECD Environment Policy Paper. 2013, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
119. Pacala, S., Socolow, R., Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305 (2004), 968–972.
120. Parsons, W., Baker, S., Epri, M., Report 1: status of carbon capture and storage projects globally. GCCSI, (eds.) Strategic Analysis of the Global Status of Carbon Capture and Storage, 2009, Global CCS Institute.
121. PAG-CCS, Lowest Cost Decarbonisation for the UK: The Critical Role of CCS. Report to the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2016, Parliamentary Advisory Group on Carbon Capture and Storage, London.
122. Pietralunga, C., A la recherche d'une troisième voie pour Florange. Le Monde, 30(11), 2012, 2012.
123. Popp, D., Santen, N., Fisher-Vanden, K., Webster, M., Technology variation vs. R&D uncertainty: what matters most for energy patent success?. Resour. Energy Econ. 35 (2013), 505–533.
124. Poszywak, A., 2015. Hitting the reset button: NRG targets debt reduction, stock buybacks with restructuring. SNL Canada Energy Week, 28 September 2015.
125. Poyry, A Strategic Approach for Developing CCS in the UK. Report No. 2016/346., 2016, The Committee on Climate Change, London.
126. Poyry & Elementenergy, 2015. Potential CCS Cost Reduction Mechanisms: Final Report Summary. London: Committee on Climate Change.
127. REN21, Renewable global status report update. El-ashry, M., (eds.) Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century, 2015, REN21 Secretariat, Paris.
128. Ragland, C.J., Feldpausch-Parker, A., Peterson, T.R., Stephens, J., Wilson, E., Socio-political dimensions of CCS deployment through the lens of social network analysis. Energy Procedia 4 (2011), 6210–6217.
129. Rai, V., Victor, D.G., Thurber, M.C., Carbon capture and storage at scale: lessons from the growth of analogous energy technologies. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 4089–4098.
130. Renner, M., Carbon prices and CCS investment: a comparative study between the European Union and China. Energy Policy 75 (2014), 327–340.
131. Riesch, H., Oltra, C., Lis, A., Upham, P., Pol, M., Internet-based public debate of CCS: lessons from online focus groups in Poland and Spain. Energy Policy 56 (2013), 693–702.
132. Rip, A., Kemp, R., Technological change. Malone, E.L., (eds.) Human Choice and Climate Change, 1998, Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, US.
133. Romm, J.J., The hype about hydrogen. Issues Sci. Technol. 20 (2004), 74–81.
134. 2 emissions abatement in the Nordic carbon-intensive industry – an end-game in sight?. Energy 80 (2015), 715–730.
135. Ruef, A., Markard, J., What happens after a hype? How changing expectations affected innovation activities in the case of stationary fuel cells. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 22 (2010), 317–338.
136. SCCS, About SCCS [Online]. 2005, British Geological Survey, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh Available: http://www.sccs.org.uk/about/sccs (accessed 04.09.15).
137. Saskpower, Capturing Carbon and the World's Attention [Online]. 2016 Available: http://www.saskpower.com/our-power-future/innovating-today-to-power-tomorrow/capturing-carbon-and-the-worlds-attention/ (accessed 29.05.16).
138. Schreiber, A., Zapp, P., Markewitz, P., V. Gele, S., Environmental analysis of a German strategy for carbon capture and storage of coal power plants. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 7873–7883.
139. Scott, V., Gilfillan, S., Markusson, N., Chalmers, H., Haszeldine, R.S., Last chance for carbon capture and storage. Nature Clim. Change 3 (2013), 105–111.
140. Scott, V., What can we expect from Europe's carbon capture and storage demonstrations?. Energy Policy 54 (2013), 66–71.
141. Scrase, J.I., Ockwell, D.G., The role of discourse and linguistic framing effects in sustaining high carbon energy policy—an accessible introduction. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 2225–2233.
142. Selosse, S., Ricci, O., MA ZI, N., Fukushima's impact on the European power sector: the key role of CCS technologies. Energy Econ. 39 (2013), 305–312.
143. Shackley, S., Evar, B., Up and down with CCS: the issue-attention cycle and the political dynamics of decarbonisation. Markusson, N., Shackley, S., Evar, B., (eds.) The Social Dynamics of Carbon Capture and Storage: Understanding CCS Representations, Governance and Innovation, 2012, Routledge, Oxford, UK.
144. Shell Canada, Quest Carbon Capture and Storage Project [Online]. 2016 Available: http://www.shell.ca/en/aboutshell/our-business-tpkg/downstream/oil-sands/quest.html(accessed 31.05.16).
145. Singer, S., The Energy Report: 100% Renewable Energy by 2050., 2011, WWF, Gland, Switzerland.
146. Sovacool, B.K., Gilbert, A., Nugent, D., Risk, innovation, electricity infrastructure and construction cost overruns: testing six hypotheses. Energy 74 (2014), 906–917.
147. Stephens, J.C., Wilson, E.J., Peterson, T.R., Socio-Political Evaluation of Energy Deployment (SPEED): an integrated research framework analyzing energy technology deployment. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 75 (2008), 1224–1246.
148. Stephens, J.C., Hansson, A., Liu, Y., DE Coninck, H., Vajjhala, S., Characterizing the international carbon capture and storage community. Global Environ. Change 21 (2011), 379–390.
149. Stephens, J.C., Technology leader, policy laggard: CCS development for climate mitigation in the US political context. Meadowcroft, J., Langhelle, O., (eds.) Caching the Carbon: the Politics and Policy of Carbon Capture and Storage, 2011, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, Northhampton, MA, USA.
150. Stephens, J.C., Carbon capture and storage: a controversial climate mitigation approach. Int. Spect. 50 (2015), 74–84.
151. Stern, N.H., Treasury, H., 2006, Chapter 16 accelerating technological innovation. Stern, N.H., Great Britain. Treasury, (eds.) Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, 2006, HM Treasury, London.
152. Tan, X., Clean technology R&D and innovation in emerging countries—experience from China. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 2916–2926.
153. Tidball, R., Bluestein, J., Rodriguez, N., Knoke, S., Cost and Performance Assumptions for Modeling Electricity Generation Technologies. 2010, NREL.
154. Torvanger, A., Meadowcroft, J., The political economy of technology support: making decisions about carbon capture and storage and low carbon energy technologies. Global Environ. Change 21 (2011), 303–312.
155. Turley, A. 2015. Local Labour MPs call on government to step up support for CCS project on Teesside. Labour and Co-operative, 18 November 2015.
156. UK Government, Gleneagles Plan of Action [Online]. 2005, HM Publishing Office, London Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/48584/gleneagles-planofaction.pdf(accessed 10.07.13).
157. UKCCSRC, Home Page of UK Carbon Capture and Storage Research Centre, London. 2012 Available: https://ukccsrc.ac.uk./ [Online](accessed 04.0915).
158. Ullman, J.B., Bentler, P.M., Structural Equation Modeling. 2003, Wiley Online Library.
159. Unruh, G.C., Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28 (2000), 817–830.
160. Van Alphen, K., Hekkert, M.P., Turkenburg, W.C., Comparing the development and deployment of carbon capture and storage technologies in Norway, the Netherlands, Australia, Canada and the United States-an innovation system perspective. Energy Procedia 1 (2009), 4591–4599.
161. Van Alphen, K., Van Ruijven, J., Kasa, S., Hekkert, M., Turkenburg, W., The performance of the Norwegian carbon dioxide: capture and storage innovation system. Energy Policy 37 (2009), 43–55.
162. Van Alphen, K., Noothout, P.M., Hekkert, M.P., Turkenburg, W.C., Evaluating the development of carbon capture and storage technologies in the United States. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14 (2010), 971–986.
163. Van Lente, H., Bakker, S., Competing expectations: the case of hydrogen storage technologies. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 22 (2010), 693–709.
164. Van Lente, H., Spitters, C., Peine, A., Comparing technological hype cycles: towards a theory. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 80 (2013), 1615–1628.
165. Van Lente, H., Navigating foresight in a sea of expectations: lessons from the sociology of expectations. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 24 (2012), 769–782.
166. Veefkind, V., Hurtado-Albir, J., Angelucci, S., Karachalios, K., Thumm, N., A new EPO classification scheme for climate change mitigation technologies. World Patent Inform. 34 (2012), 106–111.
167. Vel, J., Trading in discursive commodities: biofuel brokers’ roles in perpetuating the Jatropha hype in Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland) 6 (2014), 2802–2821.
168. Vergragt, J., CCS in the Netherlands: glass half empty or half full?. Meadowcroft, J., Langhelle, O., (eds.) Caching the Carbon: the Politics and Policy of Carbon Capture and Storage, 2011, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, Northhampton, MA, USA.
169. Viebahn, P., Daniel, V., Samuel, H., Integrated assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in the German power sector and comparison with the deployment of renewable energies. Appl. Energy 97 (2012), 238–248.
170. Von Stechow, C., Watson, J., Praetorius, B., Policy incentives for carbon capture and storage technologies in Europe: a qualitative multi-criteria analysis. Global Environ. Change 21 (2011), 346–357.
171. WBR/REUTERS/DPA, Klimaschutz: bundesrat verhindert gesetz zur C-Entsorgung. 2011, Spiegel Online.
172. WIPO, Patent-based Technology Analysis Report – Alternative Energy Technology., 2009, World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva.
173. WWF Ecofys & OMA, Singer, S., Denruyter, J.-p., Jeffries, B., (eds.) The Energy Report, 2011, WWF – World Wide Fund For Nature, Gland, CH http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/footprint/climate_carbon_energy/energy_solutions22/renewable_energy/sustainable_energy_report/.
174. Wang, U., NRG's $1B Bet to Show How Carbon Capture Could Be Feasible for Coal Power Plants. 2014, Forbes.
175. Watson, R.T., Zinyowera, M.C., Moss, R.H., Climate Change. Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses, Cambridge, 1995, University of Cambridge, New York and Melbourne II, W. G.
176. Watson, J., Kern, F., Markusson, N., Resolving or managing uncertainties for carbon capture and storage: lessons from historical analogues. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 81 (2014), 192–204.
177. Wilson, E., Zhang, D., Zheng, L., The socio-political context for deploying CCS in China and the U.S. Global Environ. Change 21:2 (2011), 324–335.
178. Wilson, C., Up-scaling, formative phases, and learning in the historical diffusion of energy technologies. Energy Policy 50 (2012), 81–94.
179. Working Group III, The Climate Response Strategies. 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York, NY, USA and Melbourne, Australia.
180. 2 Capture and Storage (CCS): ZEP's Proposal, 2008, European Technology Platform for Zero Emissions Fossil Fuel Power Plants, Brussels.
181. 2 Capture and Storage (CCS): ZEP Recommendations and Funding. 2008, European Technology Platform for Zero Emissions Fossil Fuel Power Plants, Brussels.
182. ZEP, CCS and the Electricity Market – Modelling the Lowest-cost Route to Decarbonising Europe. 2014, European Technology Platform for Zero Emissions Fossil Fuel Power Plants, Brussels.
183. ZEP, CCS for Industry – Modelling the Lowest-cost Route to Decarbonising Europe. 2015, European Technology Platform for Zero Emissions Fossil Fuel Power Plants, Brussels.
184. ZEROCO2. NO, Projects [Online]. 2015, Zero Emission Resource Organisation, Oslo Available: http://www.zeroco2.no/projects (accessed 22.07.15).
185. Zervos, A., Lins, C., Muth, J., RE- Thinking 2050: A 100% Renewable Energy Vision for the European Union. 2010, European Renewable Energy Council, Brussels.
186. Zhang, X., Wang, X., Chen, J., Xie, X., Wang, K., Wei, Y., A novel modeling based real option approach for CCS investment evaluation under multiple uncertainties. Appl. Energy 113 (2014), 1059–1067.
187. Zhao, S., Feron, P.H., Deng, L., Favre, E., Chabanon, E., Yan, S., Hou, J., Chen, V., QI, H., Status and progress of membrane contactors in post-combustion carbon capture: a state-of-the-art review of new developments. J. Membr. Sci. 511 (2016), 180–206.