The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: Overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies

Climatic Change

Volumn 123, Issue 3-4, 2014, Pages 353-367

  Kriegler, Elmar ^a   Weyant, John P ^b   Blanford, Geoffrey J ^c   Krey, Volker ^f   Clarke, Leon ^d   Edmonds, Jae ^d   Fawcett, Allen ^e   Luderer, Gunnar ^a   Riahi, Keywan ^f   Richels, Richard ^c   Rose, Steven K ^c   Tavoni, Massimo ^g   van Vuuren, Detlef P ^h,i  

^a POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^e U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^f INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

^g FONDAZIONE ENI ENRICO MATTEI   (Italy)

^h PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

ⁱ UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; DECARBONIZATION; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; GREENHOUSE GASES; WIND POWER;

ATMOSPHERIC GREENHOUSE; CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; CLIMATE MITIGATIONS; ENERGY TRANSFORMATION; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODELS; LOW-CARBON ELECTRICITIES; ROBUST CHARACTERISTIC; ROLE OF TECHNOLOGIES;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84898548471     PISSN: 01650009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0953-7     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. 2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Clim Chang 100: 195-202.
2. Bibas R, Méjean A (this issue) Potential and limitations of bioenergy options for low carbon transitions. Clim Chang, submitted.
3. Blanford GJ, Kriegler E, Tavoni M (this issue) Harmonization vs. Fragmentation: Overview of climate policy scenarios in EMF27. Clim Chang, submitted.
4. Calvin K et al (2012) The role of Asia in mitigating climate change: results from the Asia modeling exercise. Energy Econ 34(3): S251-S260.
5. 2 emissions mitigation and technological advance: an updated analysis of advanced technology scenarios. PNNL Report Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richmond.
6. Clarke L, Edmonds J, Krey V, Richels R, Rose S, Tavoni M (2009) International climate policy architectures: overview of the EMF 22 international scenarios. Energy Econ 31: S64-S81.
7. Edenhofer O et al (2010) The economics of low stabilization: Model comparison of mitigation strategies and costs. Energy J 31: 11-48.
8. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC)/PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (2011) Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), release version 4. 2. http://edgar. jrc. ec. europe. eu.
9. Kim SH, Wada K, Kurosawa A, Roberts M (this issue) Nuclear energy response in the EMF27 study. Clim Chang, submitted.
10. Koelbl BS, van den Broek MA, Faaij APC, van Vuuren DP (this issue) Uncertainty in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) deployment projections: a cross-model comparison exercise. Clim Chang, submitted.
11. Krey V, Clarke L (2011) Role of renewable energy in climate mitigation: a synthesis of recent scenarios. Clim Pol 11: 1131-1158.
12. Krey V, Luderer L, Clarke L, Kriegler E (this issue) Getting from here to there: energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios. Clim Chang, submitted.
13. Luderer G, Bosetti V, Jakob M, Leimbach M, Steckel JC, Waisman H, Edenhofer O (2012) The economics of decarbonizing the energy system-results and insights from the RECIPE model intercomparison. Clim Chang 114: 9-37.
14. Luderer G et al. (this issue) The role of renewable energy in climate mitigation: results from the EMF27 scenarios. Clim Chang submitted.
15. McCollum DL, Krey V, Riahi K (2011) An integrated approach to energy sustainability. Nat Clim Chang 1(9): 428-429.
16. McCollum D, Bauer N, Calvin K, Kitous A, Riahi K (this issue) Fossil resource and energy security dynamics in conventional and carbon-constrained worlds. Clim Chang, submitted.
17. Meinshausen M et al (2009) Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature 458: 1158-1162.
18. Nakicenovic N, Nordhaus W (2011) Editors' introduction: the economics of technologies to combat global warming. Energy Econ 33(4): 565-571.
19. Popp A et al. (this issue) Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options. Clim Chang, submitted.
20. Riahi K et al (2012) Chapter 17 - Energy pathways for sustainable development. Global energy assessment - toward a sustainable future. IIASA and Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1203-1306.
21. Riahi K et al (2013) Locked into Copenhagen pledges - Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. doi: 10. 1016/j. techfore. 2013. 09. 016.
22. Rose SK, Kriegler E, Bibas R, Calvin K, Popp A, van Vuuren DP, Weyant J (this issue, (a)), Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management. Clim Chang, submitted.
23. Rose SK, Richels R, Smith S, Riahi K, Strefler J, van Vuuren D (this issue, (b)) Non-Kyoto radiative forcing in long-run greenhouse gas emissions and climate change scenarios. Clim Chang, submitted.
24. Sugiyama M, Akashi O, Wada K, Kanudia A, Li J, Weyant J (this issue) Role of energy efficiency in climate change mitigation policy for India: Assessment of co-benefits and opportunities within an integrated assessment modeling framework. Clim Chang, submitted.
25. Tavoni M, Socolow R (2013) Modeling meets science and technology: an introduction to a special issue on negative emissions. Clim Chang 118(1): 1-14.
26. Tavoni M, Tol R (2010) Counting only the hits? The risk of underestimating the costs of stringent climate policy. Clim Chang 100: 769-778.
27. Weyant JP, de la Chesnaye FC, Blanford GJ (2006) Overview of EMF-21: Multigas Mitigation and Climate Policy. Energy J, Special Issue.
28. Weyant JP (2004) EMF 19: alternative technology strategies for climate change policy. Energy Econ 26(4): 501-575.