Added value of involving patients in the first step of multidisciplinary guideline development: A qualitative interview study among infertile patients

International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 299-305

  den Breejen, Elvira M E ^a   Hermens, Rosella P M G ^a   Galama, Wienke H ^a   Willemsen, Wim N P ^a   Kremer, Jan A M ^a   Nelen, Willianne L D M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Guideline development; Infertility; Patient centred care; Quality of care

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMOTION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; TABOO; ADULT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; INFERTILITY THERAPY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLIC RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STANDARDS;

ADULT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFERTILITY; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED;

EID: 84991373072     PISSN: 13534505     EISSN: 14643677     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw020     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. The AGREE collaboration. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument. London, 2010. www.agreecollaboration.org.
2. Institute Of Medicine (IOM). Clinical Practice Guidelines we can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2011.
3. Institute Of Medicine (IOM). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A new Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: IOM, 2001.
4. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). The guidelines manual. London: NICE, 2012.
5. World Health Organisation (WHO). Guidelines for WHO Guidelines. Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy. Geneva: WHO, 2003.
6. Boivin A, Currie K, Fervers B et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19:e22.
7. Leotsakos A, Zheng H, Croteau R et al. Standardization in patient safety: the WHO High 5s project. Int J Qual Health Care 2014;26:109-16.
8. Staniszewska S, Boardman F, Gunn L et al. The Warwick patient experiences framework: patient-based evidence in clinical guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care 2014;26:151-7.
9. National institute for health and clinical excellence (NICE). https://www. nice.org.uk/media/default/About/NICE-Communities/Public-involvement/Public-involvement-programme/PIP-process-guide-apr-2015.pdf, 19 January 2016, date last accessed.
10. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). http://www.sign.ac.uk/patients/network.html, 19 January 2016, date last accessed.
11. G-I-N PUBLIC Toolkit: Patient and Public Involvement in Guidelines. Guidelines International Network, 2015. http://www.g-i-n.net/document-store/working-groups-documents/g-i-n-public/toolkit/toolkit-2015, 19 January 2016, date last accessed.
12. The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW). The Participation Compass. http://www.participatiekompas. nl/over-participatiekompas/english, 19 January 2016, date last accessed.
13. Woolf S, Schunemann HJ, Eccles MP et al. Developing clinical practice guidelines: types of evidence and outcomes; values and economics, synthesis, grading, and presentation and deriving recommendations. Implement Sci 2012;7:61.
14. Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Shekelle P et al. Developing clinical practice guidelines: target audiences, identifying topics for guidelines, guideline group composition and functioning and conflicts of interest. Implement Sci. 2012;7:60.
15. Legare F, Boivin A, van derWeijden T et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: a knowledge synthesis of existing programs. Med Decis Making 2011;31:E45-74.
16. Tong A, Lopez-Vargas P, Howell M et al. Consumer involvement in topic and outcome selection in the development of clinical practice guidelines. Health Expect 2012;15:410-23.
17. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C et al. Improving chronic illness care: Translating evidence into action. Health Affairs 2001;20:64-78.
18. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H et al. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;288:2469-75.
19. Kennedy A, Rogers A, Bower P. Support for self care for patients with chronic disease. BMJ 2007;335:968-70.
20. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet. 2003;362:1225-30.
21. Cooper AR, Baker VL, Sterling EW et al. The time is now for a new approach to primary ovarian insufficiency. Fertil Steril 2011;95:1890-7.
22. van Empel IW, Aarts JW, Cohlen BJ et al. Measuring patient-centredness, the neglected outcome in fertility care: a random multicentre validation study. Hum Reprod 2010;25:2516-26.
23. Tallon D, Chard J, Dieppe P. Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer. Lancet 2000;355:2037-40.
24. Blumenthal D. Part 1: Quality of care-what is it? N Engl J Med 1996;335: 891-4.
25. Berta W, Barnsley J, Brown A et al. In the eyes of the Beholder: population perspectives on performance priorities for primary care in Canada. Healthc Policy 2008;4:86-100.
26. Aarts JW, Faber MJ, van Empel IW et al. Professionals' perceptions of their patients' experiences with fertility care. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1119-27.
27. Yen L, Gillespie J, Rn YH et al. Health professionals, patients and chronic illness policy: a qualitative study. Health Expect. 2011;14:10-20.
28. van Empel IW, Dancet EA, Koolman XH et al. Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to patients: a discrete choice experiment in fertility care. Hum Reprod 2011;26:584-93.
29. Coulter A. Patient engagement-what works? J Ambul Care Manage. 2012;35:80-9.
30. Nelen WLDM, Berg C, de Sutter P et al. Manual for European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Guideline Development. Grimbergen: ESHRE, 2008.
31. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA et al. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1506-12.
32. Gnoth C, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P et al. Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1144-7.
33. Wester F, Peters V. Kwalitan as an aid in Qualitative Analysis. Paper for the ESRC Field Research Seminar. Coventry: University of Warwick, 1995.
34. Braun V, ClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77-101.
35. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practise guidelines? A framework for improvement. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:1458-65.
36. Diaz Del Campo P, Gracia J, Blasco JA et al. A strategy for patient involvement in clinical practice guidelines: methodological approaches. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:779-84.
37. Gesell SB, Wolosin RJ. Inpatients' ratings of care in 5 common clinical conditions. Qual Manag Health Care 2004;13:222-7.
38. Velikova G, Keding A, Harley C et al. Patients report improvements in continuity of care when quality of life assessments are used routinely in oncology practice: secondary outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:2381-8.
39. Strachan PH, Ross H, Rocker GMet al.Mind the gap: Opportunities for improving end-of-life care for patients with advanced heart failure. Can J Cardiol 2009;25:635-40.
40. Dancet EA, Nelen WL, Sermeus Wet al. The patients' perspective on fertility care: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2010;16:467-87.
41. Dancet EA, Van EI, Rober P et al. Patient-centred infertility care: a qualitative study to listen to the patient's voice. Hum Reprod 2011;26:827-33.
42. van Empel IW, Hermens RP, Akkermans RP et al. Organizational determinants of patient-centered fertility care: a multilevel analysis. Fertil Steril 2011;95:513-9.
43. Dancet EA, D'Hooghe TM, Sermeus W et al. Patients from across Europe have similar views on patient-centred care: an international multilingual qualitative study in infertility care. Hum Reprod 2012;27:1702-11.
44. van Empel IWH, Nelen WLDM, Tepe ET et al. Weaknesses, strengths and needs in fertility care according to patients. Hum Reprod 2010;25:142-9.
45. Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S.Health care quality. Incorporating consumer perspectives. J Am Med Assoc 1997;278:1608-12.
46. Gupta D, Rodeghier M, Lis CG. Patient satisfaction with service quality in an oncology setting: implications for prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Qual Health Care 2013;25:696-703.
47. Gerteis M. Conference overview: through the patient's eyes-improvement strategies that work. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1999;25:335-42.
48. Kinsman L, Rotter T, James E et al. What is a clinical pathway? Development of a definition to inform the debate. BMC Med 2010;8:31.