Textile Processes for Engineering Tissues with Biomimetic Architectures and Properties

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 683-685

  Fallahi, Afsoon ^a,b,c,d   Khademhosseini, Ali ^a,b,c,e,f   Tamayol, Ali ^a,b,c  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d AMIRKABIR UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^e KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^f Konkuk University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

biofabrication; biomaterials; fiber based techniques; scaffolds; textile technologies; tissue engineering.

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIALS; BIOMIMETIC PROCESSES; BIOMIMETICS; CELL ENGINEERING; SCAFFOLDS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); TEXTILES; TISSUE;

BIOFABRICATION; BIOLOGICAL FACTORS; BIOMIMETIC PROPERTIES; TEXTILE TECHNOLOGY;

TISSUE ENGINEERING;

POLYMER; BIOMATERIAL; HYDROGEL;

BIOMIMETICS; CELL FUNCTION; CELL GROWTH; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; NANOFABRICATION; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; TEXTILE; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; TISSUE ENGINEERING; PROCEDURES; TEXTILE INDUSTRY;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOMIMETICS; HYDROGELS; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84991230777     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.07.001     Document Type: Short Survey

References (13)

1. 1 Akbari, M., et al. Textile technologies and tissue engineering: a path toward organ weaving. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5 (2016), 751–766.
2. 2 Tamayol, A., et al. Fiber-based tissue engineering: progress, challenges, and opportunities. Biotechnol. Adv. 31 (2013), 669–687.
3. 3 Butcher, A.L., et al. Nanofibrous hydrogel composites as mechanically robust tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol. 32 (2014), 564–570.
4. 4 Moutos, F.T., et al. A biomimetic three-dimensional woven composite scaffold for functional tissue engineering of cartilage. Nat. Mater. 6 (2007), 162–167.
5. 5 Onoe, H., Takeuchi, S., Cell-laden microfibers for bottom-up tissue engineering. Drug Discov. Today 20 (2015), 236–246.
6. 6 Billiet, T., et al. A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel–rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 33 (2012), 6020–6041.
7. 7 Puppi, D., et al. Nano/microfibrous polymeric constructs loaded with bioactive agents and designed for tissue engineering applications: a review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 102 (2014), 1562–1579.
8. 8 Tamayol, A., et al. Hydrogel templates for rapid manufacturing of bioactive fibers and 3D constructs. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 4 (2015), 2146–2153.
9. 9 Kang, E., et al. Digitally tunable physicochemical coding of material composition and topography in continuous microfibres. Nat. Mater. 10 (2011), 877–883.
10. 10 Onoe, H., et al. Metre-long cell-laden microfibres exhibit tissue morphologies and functions. Nat. Mater. 12 (2013), 584–590.
11. 11 Akbari, M., et al. Composite living fibers for creating tissue constructs using textile techniques. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24 (2014), 4060–4067.
12. 12 Lee, J.S., et al. Controllable protein delivery from coated surgical sutures. J. Mater. Chem. 20 (2010), 8894–8903.
13. 13 Kim, D.-H., et al. Thin, flexible sensors and actuators as ‘instrumented’ surgical sutures for targeted wound monitoring and therapy. Small 8 (2012), 3263–3268.