Multi-actor involvement for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial plans

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 62, Issue , 2017, Pages 135-146

  Rozas Vásquez, Daniel ^a,b   Fürst, Christine ^c   Geneletti, Davide ^d   Muñoz, Francisco ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE TEMUCO   (Chile)

^c MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Multi actor involvement; Policy science interface; Spatial planning; Strategic environmental assessment

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; SURVEYS;

CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXTS; INTEGRATED FRAMEWORKS; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; MULTI ACTORS; SPATIAL PLANNING; STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS;

ECOSYSTEMS;

DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INTEGRATED APPROACH; PERCEPTION; POLICY MAKING; SPATIAL PLANNING; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

CHILE;

EID: 84991206231     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Acharibasam, J.B., Noble, B.F., Assessing the impact of strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 32 (2014), 177–187, 10.1080/14615517.2014.927557.
2. Ahmed, K., Sánchez-Triana, E., Strategic Environmental Assessment for Policies An Instrument for Good Governance. 2008, World Bank, Washington, DC.
3. Albert, C., Hauck, J., Buhr, N., von Haaren, C., What ecosystem services information do users want? Investigating interests and requirements among landscape and regional planners in Germany. Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 1–13, 10.1007/s10980-014-9990-5.
4. Balvanera, P., Uriarte, M., Almeida-Leñero, L., Altesor, A., DeClerck, F., Gardner, T., Hall, J., Lara, A., Laterra, P., Peña-Claros, M., Silva Matos, D.M., Vogl, A.L., Romero-Duque, L.P., Arreola, L.F., Caro-Borrero, Á.P., Gallego, F., Jain, M., Little, C., de Oliveira Xavier, R., Paruelo, J.M., Peinado, J.E., Poorter, L., Ascarrunz, N., Correa, F., Cunha-Santino, M.B., Hernández-Sánchez, A.P., Vallejos, M., Ecosystem services research in Latin America: the state of the art. Ecosyst. Serv. 2 (2012), 56–70, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.006.
5. Barnaud, C., Antona, M., Deconstructing ecosystem services: uncertainties and controversies around a socially constructed concept. Geoforum 56 (2014), 113–123, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.07.003.
6. Barral, M.P., Maceira, N.O., Land-use planning based on ecosystem service assessment: a case study in the Southeast Pampas of Argentina. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 154 (2012), 34–43, 10.1016/j.agee.2011.07.010.
7. Bernard, H., Research methods in anthropology. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, fourth ed., 2006, Ed Oxford.
8. Bodin, Ö., Crona, B.I., The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference?. Glob. Environ. Chang. 19 (2009), 366–374, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002.
9. Bull, J.W., Jobstvogt, N., Böhnke-henrichs, A., Mascarenhas, A., Sitas, N., Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats: a SWOT analysis of the ecosystem services framework. Ecosyst. Serv. 17 (2016), 99–111, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.012.
10. Casado-Arzuaga, I., Madariaga, I., Onaindia, M., Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt. J. Environ. Manag. 129 (2013), 33–43, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.059.
11. da Silva, A., Selig, P., de Avila, A., Viegas, C., Strategic environmental assessment: one concept, multiple definitions. Int. J. Innov. Sustain. Dev. 8 (2014), 53–76.
12. Daily, G.C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Pejchar, L., Ricketts, T.H., Salzman, J., Shallenberger, R., Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7 (2009), 21–28, 10.1890/080025.
13. de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., Batagelj, V., Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. 2005, Cambridge. ed., New York.
14. Dierckx de Casterlé, B., Gastmans, C., Bryon, E., Denier, Y., QUAGOL: a guide for qualitative data analysis. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 49 (2012), 360–371, 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.012.
15. Elmqvist, T., Tuvendal, M., Krishnaswamy, J., Hylander, K., Managing Trade-offs in Ecosystem Services. 2011, Ecosystem Services Economics (ESE), Nairobi.
16. Fisher, B., Turner, R.K., Morling, P., Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 643–653, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014.
17. Foley, J.A., Defries, R., Asner, G.P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S.R., Chapin, F.S., Coe, M.T., Daily, G.C., Gibbs, H.K., Helkowski, J.H., Holloway, T., Howard, E.A., Kucharik, C.J., Monfreda, C., Patz, J.A., Prentice, I.C., Ramankutty, N., Snyder, P.K., Global Consequences of Land Use. 2005, 570, 10.1126/science.1111772.
18. Fürst, C., Frank, S., Witt, A., Koschke, L., Makeschin, F., Assessment of the effects of forest land use strategies on the provision of ecosystem services at regional scale. J. Environ. Manag. 127:Suppl (2013), S96–S116, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.020.
19. Fürst, C., Helming, K., Lorz, C., Müller, F., Verburg, P.H., Integrated land use and regional resource management—a cross-disciplinary dialogue on future perspectives for a sustainable development of regional resources. J. Environ. Manag. 127:Suppl (2013), S1–S5, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.12.015.
20. Fürst, C., Opdam, P., Inostroza, L., Luque, S., Evaluating the role of ecosystem services in participatory land use planning: proposing a balanced score card. Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 10.1007/s10980-014-0052-9.
21. Gauthier, M., Simard, L., Waaub, J.-P., Public participation in strategic environmental assessment (SEA): critical review and the Quebec (Canada) approach. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 31 (2011), 48–60, 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.006.
22. Geneletti, D., International journal of biodiversity science. Ecosystem Services & Management Reasons and Options for Integrating Ecosystem Services in Strategic Environmental Assessment of Spatial Planning, 2011, 37–41.
23. Geneletti, D., Assessing the impact of alternative land-use zoning policies on future ecosystem services. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 40 (2013), 25–35, 10.1016/j.eiar.2012.12.003.
24. Geneletti, D., A conceptual approach to promote the integration of ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment. J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manage., 17, 2015, 1550035, 10.1142/S1464333215500350.
25. Geneletti, D., Ecosystem services analysis for strategic environmental assessment: concepts and examples. Geneletti, D., (eds.) Handbook on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Impact Assessment, 2016, Edward Elgar Publishing, 41–61.
26. Geneletti, D., Strenghtening biodiversity and ecosystem services in impact assessment for better decisions. Geneletti, D., (eds.) Handbook on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Impact Assessment, 2016, Edward Elgar Publishing, 477–485.
27. Goldstein, J.H., Caldarone, G., Duarte, T.K., Ennaanay, D., Hannahs, N., Mendoza, G., Polasky, S., Wolny, S., Daily, G.C., Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 (2012), 7565–7570, 10.1073/pnas.1201040109.
28. Goncalves, J., Ferreira, J.A., The planning of strategy: a contribution to the improvement of spatial planning. Land Use Policy 45 (2015), 86–94, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.020.
29. Grunewald, K., Bastian, O., Ecosystem Services. Concept, Methods and Case Studies. 2015, 312, 10.1007/978-3-662-44143-5.
30. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., Methodologies for defining and assessing ecosystem services. Final report, JNCC, Project Code C08-0170-0062, 2009.
31. Hauck, J., Gorg, C., Varjopuro, R., Ratamaki, O., Jax, K., Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: some stakeholder perspectives. Environ. Sci. Pol. 25 (2013), 13–21, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.08.001.
32. Häyhä, T., Franzese, P.P., Ecosystem services assessment: a review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective. Ecol. Model. 289 (2014), 124–132, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.002.
33. Hein, L., van Koppen, K., de Groot, R.S., van Ierland, E.C., Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 57 (2006), 209–228, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005.
34. Karrasch, L., Matching an ecosystem services approach with social impact assessment. Geneletti, D., (eds.) Handbook on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Impact Assessment, 2016, Edward Elgar Publishing, 86–112.
35. Karrasch, L., Klenke, T., Woltjer, J., Linking the ecosystem services approach to social preferences and needs in integrated coastal land use management - a planning approach. Land Use Policy 38 (2014), 522–532, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.010.
36. Kumar, P., Esen, S.E., Yashiro, M., Linking ecosystem services to strategic environmental assessment in development policies. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 40 (2013), 75–81, 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.002.
37. Lamarque, P., Quétier, F., Lavorel, S., The diversity of the ecosystem services concept and its implications for their assessment and management. C. R. Biol. 334 (2011), 441–449, 10.1016/j.crvi.2010.11.007.
38. Laterra, P., Orúe, M.E., Booman, G.C., Agriculture, ecosystems and environment spatial complexity and ecosystem services in rural landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 154 (2012), 56–67, 10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.013.
39. Levin, K.A., Study design III: cross-sectional studies. Evid. Based. Dent. 7 (2006), 24–25, 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400375.
40. Lobos, V., Partidario, M., Theory versus practice in Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 48 (2014), 34–46, 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.04.004.
41. MA, Ecosystems and human well-being. Ecosyst. Mill. Assess. 5 (2005), 1–100, 10.1196/annals.1439.003.
42. Mascarenhas, A., Ramos, T.B., Haase, D., Santos, R., Integration of ecosystem services in spatial planning: a survey on regional planners' views. Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 1–14, 10.1007/s10980-014-0012-4.
43. Mascarenhas, A., Ramos, T.B., Haase, D., Santos, R., Ecosystem services in spatial planning and strategic environmental assessment—a European and Portuguese profile. Land Use Policy 48 (2015), 158–169, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.012.
44. MMA, Guia de Orientación Para Incorporar la Dimensión Ambiental en Procesos de Ordenamiento Territorial Sustentable. Santiago. 2015.
45. Nahlik, A.M., Kentula, M.E., Fennessy, M.S., Landers, D.H., Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice. Ecol. Econ. 77 (2012), 27–35, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.001.
46. Nahuelhual, L., Laterra, P., Villarino, S., Mastrángelo, M., Carmona, A., Jaramillo, A., Barral, P., Burgos, N., Mapping of ecosystem services: missing links between purposes and procedures. Ecosyst. Serv. 13 (2015), 162–172, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.03.005.
47. Noble, B.F., Gunn, J., Martin, J., Survey of current methods and guidance for strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 30 (2012), 139–147, 10.1080/14615517.2012.705076.
48. Noh, H., Jo, Y., Lee, S., Keyword selection and processing strategy for applying text mining to patent analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 42 (2015), 4348–4360, 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.050.
49. OECD, Applying strategic environmental assessment. Good practice guidance for development co-operation. Paris, 2006.
50. OECD, OECD Urban Policy Reviews, Chile 2013. 2013, OECD Publishing, Paris.
51. Opdam, P., Coninx, I., Dewulf, A., Steingröver, E., Vos, C., van der Wal, M., Framing ecosystem services: affecting behaviour of actors in collaborative landscape planning?. Land Use Policy 46 (2015), 223–231, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.008.
52. Österblom, H., Gårdmark, A., Bergström, L., Müller-Karulis, B., Folke, C., Lindegren, M., Casini, M., Olsson, P., Diekmann, R., Blenckner, T., Humborg, C., Möllmann, C., Making the ecosystem approach operational—can regime shifts in ecological- and governance systems facilitate the transition?. Mar. Policy 34 (2010), 1290–1299, 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.05.007.
53. Partidario, M.R., Strategic Environmental Assessment Better Practice Guide - Methodological Guidance for Strategic Thinking in SEA. Lisboa. 2012.
54. Partidario, M.R., Gomes, R.C., Ecosystem services inclusive strategic environmental assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 40 (2013), 36–46, 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.001.
55. Pena-Cortes, F., Pincheira-Ulbrich, J., Bertran, C., Tapia, J., Hauenstein, E., Fernandez, E., Rozas, D., A study of the geographic distribution of swamp forest in the coastal zone of the Araucania Region, Chile. Appl. Geogr. 31 (2011), 545–555, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.11.008.
56. Primmer, E., Furman, E., Operationalising ecosystem service approaches for governance: do measuring, mapping and valuing integrate sector-specific knowledge systems?. Ecosyst. Serv. 1 (2012), 85–92, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.008.
57. Raymond, C.M., Bryan, B.A., Hatton, D., Cast, A., Strathearn, S., Grandgirard, A., Kalivas, T., Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2008), 1301–1315, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.006.
58. Rozas-Vásquez, D., Peña-Cortés, F., Geneletti, D., Rebolledo, G., Scenario modelling To support strategic environmental assessment: application to spatial planning of coastal Wetlands in La Araucanía Region, Chile. J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manage., 16, 2014, 1450014, 10.1142/S1464333214500148.
59. Ruckelshaus, M., McKenzie, E., Tallis, H., Guerry, A., Daily, G., Kareiva, P., Polasky, S., Ricketts, T., Bhagabati, N., Wood, S.a., Bernhardt, J., Notes from the field: lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecol. Econ. 115 (2015), 11–21, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009.
60. Scolozzi, R., Morri, E., Santolini, R., Delphi-based change assessment in ecosystem service values to support strategic spatial planning in Italian landscapes. Ecol. Indic. 21 (2012), 134–144, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.019.
61. Sitas, N., Prozesky, H.E., Esler, K.J., Reyers, B., Opportunities and challenges for mainstreaming ecosystem services in development planning: perspectives from a landscape level. Landsc. Ecol., 2013, 1–17, 10.1007/s10980-013-9952-3.
62. Sitas, N., Prozesky, H., Esler, K., Reyers, B., Exploring the gap between ecosystem service research and management in development planning. Sustainability 6 (2014), 3802–3824, 10.3390/su6063802.
63. Taylor, S.J., Bogdan, R., Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. A guidebook and resource. 1998 (New York).
64. UN, Spatial Planning. Key Instrument for Development and Effective Governance With Special Reference to Contries in Transition. 2008, United Nations Publications, Geneva.
65. UN, Back to our common future. Sustainable Development in the 21st Century (SD21) Project. Summary for Policymakers. New York, 2012.
66. UN, The Millennium Development Goals Report 2014. New York. 2014.
67. UNDP, Beyond the midpoint. Achieving the Millennium Development Goals. New York, 2010.
68. UNEP, Strategic environmental assessment: towards an integrated approach environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment. Towards an Integrated Approach, 2004.
69. UNEP, Impulso a al Contabilidad Experimental de Ecosistemas del Sistema de Contabilidad Ambiental y Economica (SCAE) en Paises Piloto. 2014.
70. Vignola, R., McDaniels, T.L., Scholz, R.W., Governance structures for ecosystem-based adaptation: using policy-network analysis to identify key organizations for bridging information across scales and policy areas. Environ. Sci. Pol. 31 (2013), 71–84, 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.03.004.