The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980-2013)

Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul: 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 209-220

  Henriksen, Dorte ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SCIENCE; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA; CO-AUTHORSHIPS; LARGE DATASETS; PEER REVIEW; PRODUCTION MODELS; SOCIAL SCIENCE CITATION INDICES; WEB OF SCIENCE;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84991067894     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration, (and its study): past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365-377. doi: 10.1023/a:1014254214337
2. Bebeau, M., & Monson, V. (2011). Authorship and Publication Practices in the Social Sciences: Historical Reflections on Current Practices. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(2), 365-388. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9280-4
3. Biagioli, M. (2012). Recycling Texts or Stealing Time?: Plagiarism, Authorship, and Credit in Science. International Journal of Cultural Property, 19(3), 453-476. doi: 10.1017/s0940739112000276
4. Birnholtz, J. P. (2006). What does it mean to be an author? The intersection of credit, contribution, and collaboration in science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(13), 1758-1770. doi: 10.1002/asi.20380
5. Butler, L. (2003). Modifying publication practices in response to funding formulas. Research Evaluation, 12(1), 39-46. doi: Doi 10.3152/147154403781776780
6. Costa, M. M., & Gatz, M. (1992). Determination of Authorship Credit in Published Dissertations. Psychological Science, 3(6), 354-357. doi: DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00046.x
7. Cronin, B., Shaw, D., & La Barre, K. (2003). A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(9), 855-871. doi: 10.1002/asi.10278
8. Fisher, B. S., Cobane, C. T., Vander Ven, T. M., & Cullen, F. T. (1998). How many authors does it take to publish an article? Trends and patterns in political science. Ps-Political Science & Politics, 31(4), 847-856. doi: 10.2307/420730
9. Hicks, D. (2005). The Four Literatures of Social Science. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 473-496): Springer Netherlands.
10. Hudson, J. (1996). Trends in multi-authored papers in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(3), 153-158.
11. Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, E. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519-533. doi: DOI 10.1007/s11192-006-0127-8
12. Lee, W. M. (2000). Publication trends of doctoral students in three fields from 1965-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(2), 139-144. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(2000)51:23.0.co;2-1
13. Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization-Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29(1), 31-40. doi: Doi 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00031-1
14. Moody, J. (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 213-238.
15. Norris, R. P. (1993). Authorship Patterns in Cjnr-1970-1991. Scientometrics, 28(2), 151-158. doi: Doi 10.1007/Bf02016897
16. Ossenblok, T. L. B., Engels, T. C. E., & Sivertsen, G. (2012). The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science-a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005-9). Research Evaluation, 21(4), 280-290. doi: DOI 10.1093/reseval/rvs019
17. Ossenblok, T. L. B., Verleysen, F. T., & Engels, T. C. E. (2014). Coauthorship of journal articles and book chapters in the social sciences and humanities (2000-2010). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(5), 882-897. doi: 10.1002/asi.23015
18. Piro, F. N., Aksnes, D. W., & Rørstad, K. (2013). A macro analysis of productivity differences across fields: Challenges in the measurement of scientific publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 307-320. doi: 10.1002/asi.22746
19. Price, J. H., Dake, J. A., & Oden, L. (2000). Authorship of health education articles: Guests, ghosts, and trends. American Journal of Health Behavior, 24(4), 290-299.
20. Rennie, D., Yank, V., & Emanuel, L. (1997). When authorship fails-A proposal to make contributors accountable. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(7), 579-585. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.7.579
21. SSCI. (2012). Scope Notes 2012. Social Science Citation Index. Retrieved 10-01-2015, 2015, from http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/scope/scope-ssci/#BF
22. Weingart, P. (2005). Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics, 62(1), 117-131. doi: 10.1007/s11192-005-0007-7
23. White, K. D., Dalgleish, L., & Arnold, G. (1982). Authorship Patterns in Psychology-National and International Trends. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20(4), 190-192.
24. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039. doi: 10.1126/science.1136099