The quest for originality: A new typology of knowledge search and breakthrough inventions

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1725-1753

  Jung, Hyun Ju ^a   Lee, Jeongsik Jay ^b  

^a Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

^b DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991011424     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2014.0756     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. 1975.Adynamic model of process and product invention.Omega, 3: 639-656.
2. Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. 2010. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 306-333.
3. Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. 2004. Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 887-907.
4. Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. 2001. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 521-543.
5. Alcacer, J., & Gittelman, M. 2004. Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88: 774-779.
6. Billinger, S., Stieglitz, N., & Schumacher, T. R. 2014. Search on rugged landscapes: An experimental study. Organization Science, 25: 93-108.
7. Binnig, G., & Rohrer, H. 1986. Gerd Binnig-Nobel lecture: Scanning tunneling microscopy-From birth to adolescence. In T. Frängsmyr & G. Ekspong (Eds.), Nobel lectures, Physics 1981-1990: 389-409. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. Available at http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel-prizes/physics/laureates/1986/binnig-lecture.html. Accessed October 15, 2014.
8. Binnig, G., Rohrer, H., Gerber, C. H., & Weibel, E. 1982. Surface studies by scanning tunneling microscopy. Physical Review Letters, 49: 57-61.
9. Burgelman, R. 1983.A process model of internal corporate venturing in a major diversified firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 223-244.
10. Capaldo, A., Lavie, D., & Petruzzelli, A. M. 2014. Knowledge maturity and the scientific value of innovations: The roles of knowledge distance and adoption. Journal of Management. Published online ahead of print. doi: 10.1177/0149206314535442.
11. Cohen, P., Cohen, J., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. 2003. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Cohen, W. M. 2010. Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of invention, vol. 1: 129-213. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
13. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. 1990. Absorptive capacity:A new perspective on learning and invention. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152.
14. Cohen, W., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. 2002. Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R & D. Management Science, 48: 1-23.
15. Dosi, G. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11: 147-162.
16. Economist. 2012. Graphene shows its colours: A muchvaunted new material may change telecommunications [Optoelectronics series]. The Economist. http://www.economist.com/node/21554503/. Accessed November 5, 2014.
17. Fleming, L. 2001. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47: 117-132.
18. Fleming, L. 2002. Finding the organizational sources of technological breakthroughs: The story of Hewlett Packards thermal inkjet. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11: 1059-1084.
19. Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. 2007. Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 443-475.
20. Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. 2004. Science as a map in technological search [Special issue]. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 909-928.
21. Funk, R. J. 2014. Making the most of where you are: Geography, networks, and innovation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 193-222.
22. Galunic, C., & Rodan, S. 1998. Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian invention. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 1193-1201.
23. Geim, A. K. 2010. Andre Geim-Nobel lecture: Random walk to graphene. In K. Grandin (Ed.), Les prix Nobel [The Nobel prizes] 2010: 70-95. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International. Available at https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel-prizes/physics/laureates/2010/geim-lecture.html. Accessed November 5, 2014.
24. Granqvist, N., Grodal, S., & Woolley, J. L. 2013. Hedging your bets: Explaining executives market labeling strategies in nanotechnology. Organization Science, 24: 395-413.
25. Greve, H. R., & Seidel, M.-D. L. 2014. The thin red line between success and failure: Path dependence in the diffusion of innovative production technologies. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 475-496.
26. Griliches, Z. 1992. The search for R & D spillovers. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94: 29-47.
27. Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 693-706.
28. Hansen, M. T., & Lovas, B. 2004. How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations [Special issue]. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 801-822.
29. Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. 1999. Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81: 511-515.
30. Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. 1990. Architectural invention: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9-30.
31. Henderson, R. M., & Cockburn, I. 1994. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research [Winter special issue]. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 63-84.
32. Jaffe, A. 1986. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R & D: Evidence from firms patents, profits, and market value. The American Economic Review, 76: 984-1001.
33. Jiang, L., Tan, J., & Thursby, M. 2011. Incumbent firm invention in emerging fields: Evidence from the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 55-75.
34. Jung, H. J., & Lee, J. 2014. The impacts of science and technology policy interventions on university research: Evidence from the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative. Research Policy, 43: 74-91.
35. Kaplan, S., & Vakili, K. 2015. The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 1435-1457.
36. Katila, R. 2002.Newproduct search over time: Past ideas in their prime? Academy of Management Journal, 45: 995-1010.
37. Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. 2002. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1183-1194.
38. Katila, R., & Chen, E. 2008. Effects of search timing on invention: The value of not being in sync with rivals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 593-625.
39. Klepper, S. 1997. Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6: 145-182.
40. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3: 383-397.
41. Konstantatos, G., Badioli, M., Gaudreau, L., Osmond, J., Bernechea, M., de Arquer, F. P., Gatti, F., & Koppens, F. H. 2012. Hybrid graphene-quantum dot phototransistors with ultrahigh gain. Nature Nanotechnology, 7: 363-368.
42. Kuhn, T. S. 1996. The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Lavie, D., & Drori, I. 2012. Collaborating for knowledge creation and application: The case of nanotechnology research programs. Organization Science, 23: 704-724.
44. Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. 2010. Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 4: 109-155.
45. Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. 1993. The myopia of learning [Winter special issue]. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 95-112.
46. March, J. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71-87.
47. March, J., & Simon, H. 1958. Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
48. Merton, R. 1973. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Meyer, A., Brooks, G., & Goes, J. 1990. Environmental jolts and industry revolutions: Organizational responses to discontinuous change. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 93-110.
50. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer [Winter special issue]. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 77-92.
51. National Science and Technology Council. 2011, February. National Nanotechnology Initiative strategic plan. Washington, D.C.: Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology Subcommittee; Committee on Technology, National Science and Technology Council. http://www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/pub-resource/2011-strategic-plan.pdf. Accessed December 4, 2011.
52. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 1977. In search of useful theory of invention. Research Policy, 6: 36-76.
53. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 1982.Anevolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Nerkar, A. 2003. Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Science, 49: 211-229.
55. Paradise, J. 2012. Claiming nanotechnology: Improving USPTO efforts at classification of emerging nano-enabled pharmaceutical technologies. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 10: 169-208.
56. Podolny, J. M., & Stuart, T. E. 1995.Arole-based ecology of technological change. American Journal of Sociology, 100: 1224-1260.
57. Puranam, P., Singh, H., & Zollo, M. 2006. Organizing for invention: Managing the coordination-Autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 263-280.
58. Roach, M., & Cohen, W. M. 2012. Lens or prism? Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows from public research. Management Science, 59: 504-525.
59. Romanelli, E., & Tushman, M. L. 1994. Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1141-1166.
60. Romer, P. M. 1994. Economic growth and investment in children. Daedalus, 123: 141-154.
61. Rosenberg, N. 1976. On technological expectations. The Economic Journal, 86: 523-535.
62. Rosenberg, N. 1996. Uncertainty and technological change. In R. Landau, T. Taylor & G. Wright (Eds.), The mosaic of economic growth: 91-125. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
63. Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. 2001. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disc industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 287-306.
64. Sahal, D. 1985. Technological guideposts and invention avenues. Research Policy, 14: 61-82.
65. Schumpeter, J.1939. Business cycles.NewYork:McGraw-Hill.
66. Schumpeter, J. 1975. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
67. Simon, H. A. 1996. The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
68. Simonton, D. K. 1999. Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.
69. Simonton, D. K. 2004. Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and Zeitgeist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Singh, J., & Fleming, L. 2010. Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Science, 56: 41-56.
71. Stuart, T. E., & Podolny, J. M. 1996. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 21-38.
72. Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. 2005. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy ofManagement Journal, 48: 450-463.
73. Thompson, P., & Fox-Kean, M. 2005. Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment. The American Economic Review, 95: 450-460.
74. Toh, P. K., & Kim, T. 2013. Why put all your eggs in one basket? A competition-based view of how technological uncertainty affects a firms technological specialization. Organization Science, 24: 1214-1236.
75. Tortoriello, M., & Krackhardt, D. 2010. Activating crossboundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of inventions. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 167-181.
76. Trajtenberg, M. 1990. A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of inventions. The Rand Journal of Economics, 21: 172-187.
77. Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., & Jaffe, A. 1997. University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5: 19-50.
78. Tushman, M., & Anderson, P. 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 439-465.
79. USPTO. 2005a, March. Handbook of classification. Alexandria, VA: Author. http://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/web/offices/opc/documents/handbook.pdf. Accessed November 5, 2014.
80. USPTO. 2005b, November. Classification order 1850. Alexandria, VA: Author. http://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/web/offices/opc/documents/1850.pdf. Accessed November 5, 2014.
81. Utterback, J. 1971. The process of technological invention within the firm. Academy of Management Journal, 12: 75-88.
82. Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M., & Jones, B. 2013. Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science, 342: 468-472.
83. Weitzman, M. L. 1998. Recombinant growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113: 331-360.
84. Youtie, J., Iacopetta, M., & Graham, S. 2008. Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: Can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33: 315-329.
85. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, conceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27: 185-203.
86. Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M.R. 2011, July 1.COMETS data description, release 1.0. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for International Science, Technology, and Cultural Policy.
87. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Armstrong, J. 2002. Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48: 138-153.
88. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., Furner, J., Liu, R., & Ma, H. 2007. Minerva unbound: Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and new knowledge production. Research Policy, 36: 850-863.