Measuring participation when combining subjective and objective variables: The development of the Ghent Participation Scale (GPS)

European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 527-540

  Van De Velde, Dominique ^a   Bracke, Piet ^a   Van Hove, Geert ^a   Josephsson, Staffan ^b   Viaene, Annick ^c   De Boever, Ellen ^c   Coorevits, Pascal ^a   Vanderstraeten, Guy ^a,b,c  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Disability and Health; International Classification of Functioning; Patient participation; Psychometrics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY CARE; BELGIUM; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DISABILITY; DISABLED PERSON; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REHABILITATION; REHABILITATION CENTER; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY CARE; BELGIUM; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); OUTPATIENTS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REHABILITATION CENTERS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84990966847     PISSN: 19739087     EISSN: 19739095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Imrie R. Demystifying disability: a review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Sociol Health Illn 2004;26:287-305.
2. Wade DT, Halligan P. New wine in old bottles: the WHO ICF as an explanatory model of human behaviour. Clinical Rehabilitation 2003;17:349-54.
3. Wade DT, Halligan PW. Do biomedical models of illness make for good healthcare systems? Brit Med J 2004 11;329:1398-401.
4. Williams SJ. Sociological imperialism and the profession of medicine revisited: where are we now? Sociol Health Illn 2001;23:135-58.
5. World Health Organisation. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
6. Van den Heuvel WJA. Revalidatie en participatie. Aanvaarding ambt van hoogleraar revalidatie en handicap 2000.
7. Brown M, Dijkers MP, Gordon WA, Ashman T, Charatz H, Cheng Z. Participation objective, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004;19:459-81.
8. Wilkie R, Peat G, Thomas E, Hooper H, Croft PR. The Keele Assessment of Participation: a new instrument to measure participation restriction in population studies. Combined qualitative and quantitative examination of its psychometric properties. Qual Life Res 2005;14:1889-99.
9. Ostir GV, Granger CV, Black T, Roberts P, Burgos L, tinkewiz P, et al. Preliminary results for the PAR-PRO: a measure of home and community participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:1043-51.
10. van Brakel WH, Anderson AM, Mutatkar RK, Bakirtzief Z, Nicholls PG, Raju MS, et al. The Participation Scale: measuring a key concept in public health. Disabil Rehabil 2006 28;28:193-203.
11. Post MW, de Witte LP, Reichrath E, Verdonschot MM, Wijlhuizen GJ, Perenboom RJ. Development and validation of IMPACT-S, an ICF-based questionnaire to measure activities and participation. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:620-7.
12. Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Jette AM, Ware JE. Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Participation Measure for Post-Acute Care (PM-PAC). Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86:57-71.
13. Post MW, van der Zee CH, Hennink J, Schafrat CG, Visser-Meily JM, van Berlekom SB. Validity of the utrecht scale for evaluation of rehabilitation-participation. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:478-85.
14. Cardol M, de Haan RJ, van den Bos GAM, de Jong BA, de Groot IJM. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). Clin Rehabil 1999 1;13:411-9.
15. Cardol M, de Haan RJ, de Jong BA, van den Bos GAM, de Groot IJM. Psychometric properties of the impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:210-6.
16. Gray DB, Hollingsworth HH, Stark SL, Morgan KA. Participation survey/mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:189-97.
17. Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, Whiteneck G, Bogner J, Rodriguez E. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1445-60.
18. Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:569-76.
19. Ueda S, Okawa Y. The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: what is it and what is it for? Disabil Rehabil 2003 3;25:596-601.
20. Haggstrom A, Lund ML. The complexity of participation in daily life: a qualitative study of the experiences of persons with acquired brain injury. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:89-95.
21. Van de Ven L, Post M, de WL, van den Heuvel W. Strategies for autonomy used by people with cervical spinal cord injury: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:249-60.
22. Haak M, Ivanoff SD, Fange A, Sixsmith J, Iwarsson S. Home as the locus and origin for participation: experiences among very old Swedish people. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health 2007;27:95-103.
23. Dijkers MP. Issues in the conceptualization and measurement of participation: an overview. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91(9 Suppl):S5-16.
24. Jette AM, Keysor J, Coster W, Ni P, Haley S. Beyond function: predicting participation in a rehabilitation cohort. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:2087-94.
25. Magasi S, Post MW. A comparative review of contemporary participation measures' psychometric properties and content coverage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91(9 Suppl):S17-S28.
26. Van de Velde D, Bracke P, Van Hove G, Josephsson S, Vanderstraeten G. Perceived Participation, experiences from persons with spinal cord injury in their transition period from hospital to home. Int J Rehabil Res 2010;33:346-55.
27. Borell L, Asaba E, Rosenberg L, Schult M, Townsend E. Exploring experiences of "participation" among individuals living with chronic pain. Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13:76-85.
28. Dedding C, Cardol M, Eyssen IC, Dekker J, Beelen A. Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a client-centred outcome measurement. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:660-7.
29. Lorenzo-Seva U. Promin: A method for oblique factor rotation. Multivariate Behavioural Research 1999;34:347-65.
30. Tabachnick CB. Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Pearson Education Inc; 2007.
31. MacCallum R, Widaman K, Zhang S, Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods 1999;4:84-99.
32. Henson RK, Roberts JK. Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: common errors and some comments on improved practice. Educ Psychol Meas 2006;66:401-6.
33. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34-42.
34. Cardol M, Beelen A, van den Bos GA, De Jong BA, de G, I, de Haan RJ. Responsiveness of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1524-9.
35. Kroll T, Kehn M, Ho PS, Groah S. The SCI Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES): development and psychometric properties. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2007 30;4:1-6.
36. May L, Day R, Warren S. Evaluation of patient education in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: knowledge, problem-solving and perceived importance. Disabil Rehabil 2006 15;28:405-13.
37. Wilde B, Larsson G, Larsson M, Starrin B. Quality of care, development of a patient-centred questionnaire based on a grounded theory model. Scan J Caring Sci 1994;8:39-48.
38. Deyo RA, Inui TS. Toward clinical applications of health status measures: sensitivity of scales to clinically important changes. Health Serv Res 1984;19:275-89.
39. Lorenzo-Seva U, Ferrando PJ. Factor 9.2 A comprehensive program for fitting exploratory and semiconfirmatory factor analysis and IRT models. Applies Psychological Measurement 2013;37:497-8.
40. IBM SPS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 [computer program]. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2013.
41. Hobart J, Cano S. Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods. Health Technol Assess 2009;13:iii, ix-iii, 177.
42. Essink-Bot ML, Krabbe PF, Bonsel GJ, Aaronson NK. An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. The Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the COP/WONCA charts, and the EuroQol instrument. Med Care 1997;35:522-37.
43. Costello AB, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from you analysis. Practical Assessment Research and Evalaution 2005;10:2-8.
44. Whiteneck GG, Bogner JA, Heinemann AW. Advancing the measurement of participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:540-1.
45. Johnston MV, Goverover Y, Dijkers M. Community activities and individuals' satisfaction with them: quality of life in the first year after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:735-45.
46. Ray JJ. Acquiescence and response skewness in scale construction: a paradox. Personality and individual differences 1985;6:655-6.