A Reliability Generalization of the Overexcitability Questionnaire–Two

Journal of Advanced Academics

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 671-692

  Warne, Russell T ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

meta analysis; Overexcitability Questionnaire Two; reliability generalization

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990946474     PISSN: 1932202X     EISSN: 21629536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932202X11424881     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ackerman C. M., (1997). Identifying gifted adolescents using personality characteristics: Dabrowski’s overexcitabilities. Roeper Review, 19, 229-236
2. Ackerman C. M., (2001, January 28), OEQII [Online discussion group post]. Retrieved from http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dabrowskidiscussiongroup/message/421
3. Ackerman C. M., (2009). The essential elements of Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration and how they are connected. Roeper Review, 31, 81-95
4. Ackerman C. M., Miller N. B., (1997, November). Exploring a shortened version of the Overexcitability Questionnaire. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Gifted Children, Little Rock, AR
5. Bouchet N., Falk R. F., (2001). The relationship among giftedness, gender, and overexcitability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 260-267
6. Carman C. A., (2005). Relationships among traditional and modern constructs used in identifying giftedness (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Lawrence
7. Cooper H., (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
8. Cronbach L. J., (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334
9. Cronbach L. J., (2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 391-418
10. Dabrowski K., (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston, MA: Little, Brown
11. Daniels S., Piechowski M. M., (2009). Embracing intensity: Overexcitability, sensitivity, and the developmental potential of the gifted. In Daniels S., Piechowski M. M., (Eds.), Living with intensity (pp. 3-17). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press
12. Embretson S. E., Reise S. P., (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
13. Falk R. F., Lind S., Miller N. B., Piechowski M. M., Silverman L. K., (1999). The Overexcitability Questionnaire–Two (OEQII): Manual, scoring system, and questionnaire. Denver, CO: Institute for the Study of Advanced Development
14. Falk R. F., Yakmaci-Guzel B., Chang A. H., Pardo R., Chavez-Eakle R. A., (2008). Measuring overexcitability: Replication across five countries. In Mendaglio S., (Ed.), Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration (pp. 183-199). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press
15. Feldt L. S., (1965). The approximate sampling distribution of Kuder-Richardson reliability coefficient twenty. Psychometrika, 30, 357-370
16. Fiedler E. D., (2009). Advantages and challenges of lifespan intensity. In Daniels S., Piechowski M. M., (Eds.), Living with intensity (pp. 167-184). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press
17. Gallagher S. A., (1986). A comparison of the concept of overexcitabilities with measures of creativity and school achievement in sixth-grade students. Roeper Review, 8, 115-119
18. Gross C. M., Rinn A. N., Jamieson K. M., (2007). Gifted adolescents’ overexcitabilities and self-concepts: An analysis of gender and grade level. Roeper Review, 29, 240-248
19. Haertel E. H., (2006). Reliability. In Brennan R. L., (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 65-110). Westport, CT: Praeger
20. Hakstian A. R., Whalen T. E., (1976). A k-sample significance test for independent alpha coefficients. Psychometrika, 41, 219-231
21. Henson R. K., Thompson B., (2002). Characterizing measurement error in scores across studies: Some recommendations for conducting “reliability generalization” studies. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35, 113-126
22. Hogan T. P., Benjamin A., Brezinski K. L., (2000). Reliability methods: A note on the frequency of use of various types. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 523-531
23. Kaplan R. M., Saccuzzo D. P., (2005). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth
24. Kieffer K. M., Reese R. J., Vacha-Haase T., (2010). Reliability generalization methods in the context of giftedness research. In Thompson B., Subotnik R. F., (Eds.), Methodologies for conducting research on giftedness (pp. 89-111). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
25. Lipsey M. W., Wilson D. B., (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
26. Miller N. B., Falk R. F., Huang Y., (2009). Gender identity and the overexcitability profiles of gifted college students. Roeper Review, 31, 161-169
27. Moon J. H., Montgomery D., (2005). Profiles of overexcitabilities for Korean high school gifted students according to gender and domain of study. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 15, 1-10
28. O’Rourke N., (2004). Reliability generalization of responses by care providers to the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 973-990
29. Palmer M. E., (2006). The relationship between levels of development and the elaboration of possible selves (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University–Commerce
30. Piechowski M. M., Colangelo N., (1984). Developmental potential of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 80-88
31. Piirto J., Montgomery D., May J., (2008). A comparison of Dabrowski’s overexcitabilities by gender for American and Korean gifted students. High Ability Studies, 19, 141-153
32. Rinn A. N., Mendaglio S., Rudasill K. M., McQueen K. S., (2010). Examining the relationship between overexcitabilities and self-concepts of gifted adolescents via multivariate cluster analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 3-17
33. Rodriguez M. C., Maeda Y., (2006). Meta-analysis of coefficient alpha. Psychological Methods, 11, 306-322
34. Ryngala D. J., Shields A. L., Caruso J. C., (2005). Reliability generalization of the Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 259-271
35. Siu A. F. Y., (2010). Comparing overexcitabilities of gifted and non-gifted school children in Hong Kong: Does culture make a difference? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30, 71-83
36. Thompson B., Vacha-Haase T., (2000). Psychometrics is datametrics: The test is not reliable. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 174-195
37. Tieso C. L., (2007a). Overexcitabilities: A new way to think about talent? Roeper Review, 29, 232-239
38. Tieso C. L., (2007b). Patterns of overexcitabilities in identified gifted students and their parents: A hierarchical model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 11-22
39. Tillier W., (2009). Dabrowski without the theory of positive disintegration just isn’t Dabrowski. Roeper Review, 31, 123-126
40. Treat A. R., (2006). Overexcitability in gifted sexually diverse populations. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 244-257
41. Treat A. R., (2008). Beyond analysis by gender: Overexcitability dimensions of sexually diverse populations and implications for gifted education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington
42. Vacha-Haase T., (1998). Reliability generalization: Exploring variance in measurement error affecting score reliability across studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 6-20
43. Vacha-Haase T., Henson R. K., Caruso J. C., (2002). Reliability generalization: Moving toward improved understanding and use of score reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 562-569
44. Vacha-Haase T., Kogan L. R., Thompson B., (2000). Sample compositions and variabilities in published studies versus those in test manuals: Validity of score reliability inductions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 509-522
45. Viswesvaran C., Ones D. S., (2000). Measurement error in “big five factors” personality assessment: Reliability generalization across studies and measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 224-235
46. Warne R. T., (2011). An investigation of measurement invariance across genders on the Overexcitability Questionnaire-Two (OEQII). Journal of Advanced Academics, 22, 578-593. doi:10.1177/1932202X1141482110.1177/1932202X11414821
47. Warne R. T., McKyer E. L. J., Smith M. L., (2012). An introduction to item response theory for health behavior researchers. American Journal of Health Behavior, 36, 31-43
48. Wilkinson L., & The Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604