Tox21 challenge to build predictive models of nuclear receptor and stress response pathways as mediated by exposure to environmental chemicals and drugs

Frontiers in Environmental Science

Volumn 3, Issue JAN, 2016, Pages

  Huang, Ruili ^a   Xia, Menghang ^a   Nguyen, Dac Trung ^a   Zhao, Tongan ^a   Sakamuru, Srilatha ^a   Zhao, Jinghua ^a   Shahane, Sampada A ^a   Rossoshek, Anna ^a   Simeonov, Anton ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

HTS; In vitro assay; Nuclear receptor; Predictive model; QSAR; Stress response; Tox21

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990828880     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2296665X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2015.00085     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Altman, N. S. (1992). An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. Am. Stat. 46, 175-185.
2. Attene-Ramos, M. S., Huang, R., Michael, S., Witt, K. L., Richard, A., Tice, R. R., et al. (2015). Profiling of the Tox21 chemical collection for mitochondrial function to identify compounds that acutely decrease mitochondrial membrane potential. Environ. Health Perspect. 123, 49-56. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1408642
3. Bartashevich, E. V., Potemkin, V. A., Grishina, M. A., and Belik, A. V. (2002). A method for multiconformational modeling of the three-dimensional shape of a molecule. J. Struct. Chem. 43, 1033-1039. doi: 10.1023/A:1023611131068
4. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5-32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
5. Chen, S., Hsieh, J. H., Huang, R., Sakamuru, S., Hsin, L. Y., Xia, M., et al. (2015). Cell-based high-throughput screening for aromatase inhibitors in the Tox21 10K library. Toxicol. Sci. 147, 446-457. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv141
6. Cherkasov, A. (2005). Inductive QSAR descriptors. distinguishing compounds with antibacterial activity by artificial neural networks. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 6, 63-86. doi: 10.3390/i6010063
7. Collins, F. S., Gray, G. M., and Bucher, J. R. (2008). Toxicology. Transforming environmental health protection. Science 319, 906-907. doi: 10.1126/science.1154619
8. Cortes, C., and Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20, 273-297. doi: 10.1007/BF00994018
9. Eduati, F., Mangravite, L. M., Wang, T., Tang, H., Bare, J. C., Huang, R., et al. (2015). Prediction of human population responses to toxic compounds by a collaborative competition. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 933-940. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3299
10. Friedman, J. H. (1999). Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Available online at: http://statweb.stanford.edu/~jhf/ftp/trebst.pdf
11. Gaulton, A., Bellis, L. J., Bento, A. P., Chambers, J., Davies, M., Hersey, A., et al. (2012). ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D1100-D1107. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr777
12. Geurts, P., Ernst, D., and Wehenkel, L. (2006). Extremely randomized trees. Mach. Learn. 63, 3-42. doi: 10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1
13. Hall, L. H., and Kier, L. B. (1995). Electrotopological state indices for atom types: a novel combination of electronic, topological, and valence state information. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 35, 1039-1045. doi: 10.1021/ci00028a014
14. Hsu, C. W., Zhao, J., Huang, R., Hsieh, J. H., Hamm, J., Chang, X., et al. (2014). Quantitative high-throughput profiling of environmental chemicals and drugs that modulate farnesoid X receptor. Sci. Rep. 4:6437. doi: 10.1038/srep06437
15. Huang, R., Sakamuru, S., Martin, M. T., Reif, D. M., Judson, R. S., Houck, K. A., et al. (2014). Profiling of the Tox21 10K compound library for agonists and antagonists of the estrogen receptor alpha signaling pathway. Sci. Rep. 4:5664. doi: 10.1038/srep05664
16. Huang, R., Xia, M., Cho, M. H., Sakamuru, S., Shinn, P., Houck, K. A., et al. (2011). Chemical genomics profiling of environmental chemical modulation of human nuclear receptors. Environ. Health Perspect. 119, 1142-1148. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002952
17. Judson, R., Richard, A., Dix, D. J., Houck, K., Martin, M., Kavlock, R., et al. (2009). The toxicity data landscape for environmental chemicals. Environ. Health Perspect. 117, 685-695. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0800168
18. Kavlock, R. J., Austin, C. P., and Tice, R. R. (2009). Toxicity testing in the 21st century: implications for human health risk assessment. Risk Anal. 29, 485-487. discussion: 492-487. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01168.x
19. Kola, I., and Landis, J. (2004). Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 711-715. doi: 10.1038/nrd1470
20. Marbach, D., Costello, J. C., Kuffner, R., Vega, N. M., Prill, R. J., Camacho, D. M., et al. (2012). Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference. Nat. Methods 9, 796-804. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2016
21. Muster, W., Breidenbach, A., Fischer, H., Kirchner, S., Müller, L., and Pähler, A. (2008). Computational toxicology in drug development. Drug Discov. Today 13, 303-310. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.12.007
22. Nishihara, K., Huang, R., Zhao, J., Shahane, S. A., Witt, K. L., Smith-Roe, S. L., et al. (2016). Identification of genotoxic compounds using isogenic DNA repair deficient DT40 cell lines on a quantitative high throughput screening platform. Mutagenesis 31, 69-81. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gev055
23. NRC (2007). Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
24. PubChem (2013a). Tox21 Phase II Compound Collection [Online]. Available online at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pcsubstance/?term=tox21 (Accessed Dec 4, 2013).
25. PubChem (2013b). Tox21 Phase II Data [Online]. Available online at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pcassay?term=tox21 (Accessed Nov 16, 2013).
26. Ruggiu, F., Marcou, G., Varnek, A., and Horvath, D. (2010). ISIDA property-labelled fragment descriptors. Mol. Inform. 29, 855-868. doi: 10.1002/minf.201000099
27. Saiakhov, R. D., and Klopman, G. (2008). MultiCASE expert systems and the REACH initiative. Toxicol. Mech. Methods 18, 159-175. doi: 10.1080/15376510701857460
28. Sanderson, D. M., and Earnshaw, C. G. (1991). Computer prediction of possible toxic action from chemical structure; the DEREK system. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 10, 261-273. doi: 10.1177/096032719101000405
29. Schmidhuber, J. (2014). Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw. 61, 85-117. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003
30. Steinbeck, C., Han, Y., Kuhn, S., Horlacher, O., Luttmann, E., and Willighagen, E. (2003). The chemistry development kit (CDK): an open-source Java library for chemo- and bioinformatics. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43, 493-500. doi: 10.1021/ci025584y
31. Tetko, I. V. (2008). Associative neural network. Methods Mol. Biol. 458, 185-202. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-101-1_10
32. Tetko, I. V., Gasteiger, J., Todeschini, R., Mauri, A., Livingstone, D., Ertl, P., et al. (2005). Virtual computational chemistry laboratory-design and description. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 19, 453-463. doi: 10.1007/s10822-005-8694-y
33. Tetko, I. V., and Tanchuk, V. Y. (2002). Application of associative neural networks for prediction of lipophilicity in ALOGPS 2.1 program. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42, 1136-1145. doi: 10.1021/ci025515j
34. Thormann, M., Vidal, D., Almstetter, M., and Pons, M. (2007). Nomen est omen: quantitative prediction of molecular properties directly from IUPAC names. Open Appl. Inform. J. 1, 28-32. doi: 10.2174/1874136300701010028
35. Tice, R. R., Austin, C. P., Kavlock, R. J., and Bucher, J. R. (2013). Improving the human hazard characterization of chemicals: a Tox21 update. Environ. Health Perspect. 121, 756-765. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205784
36. Vedani, A., and Smiesko, M. (2009). In silico toxicology in drug discovery - concepts based on three-dimensional models. Altern. Lab. Anim. 37, 477-496.
37. Yap, C. W. (2011). PaDEL-descriptor: an open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 1466-1474. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21707
38. Zou, H., and Hastie, T. (2005). Regularization and variable selection via the Elastic Net. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 67, 301-320. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x
39. Zweig, M. H., and Campbell, G. (1993). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin. Chem. 39, 561-577.