From evaluation towards an agenda for quality improvement: The development and application of the Template Process

Active Learning in Higher Education

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 60-72

  Saunders, Mark N K ^a   Williams, Christine S ^b  

^a OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Cheltenham Gloucester College of Higher Education   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

evaluation; process consultation; quality; students and lecturers; Template Process

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990375380     PISSN: 14697874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1469787405049944     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bingham, R. & Ottewill, R. (2001) ‘Whatever Happened to Peer Review? Revitalising the Contributionof Tutors to Course Evaluation’, Quality Assurance in Education 9(1): 32–39.
2. Carmen, J. M. (1990) ‘Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality: An Assessment of theSERVQUAL Dimensions’, Journal of Retailing 66(1): 33–35.
3. Chapple, M. & Murphy, R. (1996) ‘The Nominal Group Technique: Extending the Evaluation ofStudents' Teaching and Learning Experiences’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 21(2): 147–159.
4. Cronin, J. J. & Taylor, S. A. (1992) ‘Measuring Service Quality: A Re-examination and Extension’, Journal of Marketing 56 (July): 56–68.
5. Cuthbert, P. F. (1996) ‘Managing Service Quality in HE: Is SERVQUAL the Answer? Part 2’, Managing Service Quality 6(3): 31–35.
6. Harvey, L. (1998) ‘An Assessment of Past and Current Approaches to Quality inHigher Education’, Australian Journal of Education 42(3): 237–255.
7. Hendry, G. D., Cumming, R. G., Lyon, P. M. & Gordon, J. (2001) ‘Student-centred Course Evaluation in a Four-year, Problem BasedMedical Programme: Issues in Collection and Management of Feedback’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 26(4): 327–339.
8. Narasimhan, K. (1997) ‘Improving Teaching and Learning: The Perceptions MinusExpectations Gap Analysis Approach’, Training for Quality 5(3): 121–125.
9. Parasuraman, A. (1995) ‘Measuring and Monitoring ServiceQuality’, in W. J. Glynn and J. G. Barnes (eds) Understanding Services Management, pp.143–177. Chichester: Wiley.
10. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. & Berry, L. L. (1985) ‘A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications forFuture Research’, Journal of Marketing 49(Fall): 41–50.
11. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. & Berry, L. L. (1991) ‘SERVQUAL: A Multiple-item Scale for Measuring ConsumerPerception of Service Quality’, Journal of Retailing 64(Spring): 12–40.
12. Rosen, D. E. & Suprenant, C. (1998) ‘Evaluating Relationships: Are Satisfaction and Quality Enough?’, International Journal of Service Industry Management 9(2): 103–125.
13. Saunders, M. N. K. & Williams, C. S. (2001) ‘Double Loop Learning and ImprovingOrganisational Relationships: The Application of the TemplateProcess’, in M. A. Rahim, R. T. Golembiewski and C. Lundberg (eds) Current Topics in Management Vol.6, pp.127–148. Location: Elsevier Science.
14. Schein, E. H. (1999) Process Consultation Revisited: Building the HelpingRelationship. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman.
15. Staughton, R. V. W. & Williams, C. S. (1994) ‘Towards a Simple, Visual Representation of Fit in ServiceOrganisations: The Contribution of the Service Template’, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 14(5): 76–85.
16. Williams, C. S., Saunders, M. N. K. & Staughton, R. V. W. (1999) ‘Understanding Service Quality in the New Public Sector: AnExploration of Relationships in the Process of Funding Social Housing’, International Journal of Public Sector Management 12(4): 366–379.