Student Observations of Outstanding Teaching: Implications for Marketing Educators

Journal of Marketing Education

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 271-281

  Faranda, William T ^a   Clarke, Irvine ^a  

^a JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

education; in depth interview; marketing; qualitative research; teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990345083     PISSN: 02734753     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0273475304268782     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allen, Jeff, and Duane Davis. 1991. Searching for excellence in marketing education: The relationship between service quality and three outcome variables. Journal of Marketing Education 13 (Spring): 47-55.
2. Clarke, Irvine, Theresa B. Flaherty, and Sandra Mottner. 2001. Student perceptions of educational tools. Journal of Marketing Education 23 (3): 169-177.
3. Conant, Jeffrey S., Denise T. Smart, and Craig A. Kelley. 1988. Master teaching: Pursuing excellence in marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education 10 (Fall): 3-13.
4. Dana, Susan W., F. William Brown, and Nancy G. Dodd. 2001. Student perception of teaching effectiveness: A preliminary study of the effects of professors’ transformational and contingent reward leadership behaviors. Journal of the Academy of Business Education 2 (Fall): 53-70.
5. Davis, Richard, Shekhar Misra, and Stuart Van Auken. 2000. Relating pedagogical preference of marketing seniors and alumni to attitude towards the major. Journal of Marketing Education 22 (2): 147-154.
6. Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonne S. Lincoln. 1998. Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Desai, Suzanne, Earl Damewood, and Richard Jones. 2001. Be a good teacher and be seen as a good teacher. Journal of Marketing Education 23 (2): 136-144.
8. Eckrich, Donald W. 1990. If ‘excellent teaching’ is the goal, student evaluations are backfiring. Marketing Educator (Fall): 1, 6.
9. Friedmann, Herbert C. 1991. Fifty-six laws of good teaching: A sampling. Teaching Professor (January): 3.
10. Grunenwald, Joseph P., and Leonard Ackerman. 1986. A modified delphi approach for the development of student evaluations of faculty teaching. Journal of Marketing Education 8 (Summer): 32-38.
11. Guolla, Michael. 1999. Assessing the teaching quality to student satisfaction relationship: Applied customer satisfaction research in the classroom. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 7 (Summer): 87-97.
12. Haley, S. Randy. 1992. Advice for establishing an effective teaching attitude. Teaching Professor (February): 1-2.
13. Hill, Mark E., and Joel Herche. 2001. Teaching and effectiveness: Another look. Marketing Education Review 11 (Summer): 19-24.
14. Hise, Richard T., Jeffrey S. Conant, and Robert Gwinner. 1989. Mass sections: Challenges, consequences, and strategic considerations. Journal of Marketing Education 11 (Fall): 19-27.
15. Kelley, Craig A., Jeffrey S. Conant, and Denise T. Smart. 1991. Master teaching revisited: Pursuing excellence from the students’ perspective. Journal of Marketing Education 11 (Summer): 1-10.
16. Kelley, Craig A., Jeffrey S. Conant, and Denise T. Smart. 1998. Marketing education in the 21st century: A delphi approach. In 1998 AMA summer educators proceedings, edited by Ronald C. Goodstein and Scott B. MacKenzie. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
17. Lantos, Geoffrey P. 1988. Tricks of the trade: Strategies and tactics for achieving excellence in undergraduate marketing education. In 1988 AMA summer educators proceedings, edited by Gary Frazier et al., 137. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
18. Lantos, Geoffrey P. 1997. Motivating students: The attitude of the professor. Marketing Education Review 7 (2): 27-38.
19. Lincoln, Yvonne S., and Egon G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. McCombs, Barbara L., and Jo Sue Whistler. 1997. The learner-centered classroom and school: Strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. McCracken, Grant. 1988. The long interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Smart, Denise T., Craig A. Kelley, and Jeffrey S. Conant. 1999. Marketing education in the year 2000: Changes observed and challenges anticipated. Journal of Marketing Education 21 (3): 206-216.
23. Smart, Denise T., Craig A. Kelley, and Jeffrey S. Conant. 2003. Mastering the art of teaching: Pursuing excellence in a new millennium. Journal of Marketing Education 25 (1): 71-78.
24. Spiggle, Susan. 1994. Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 21(December): 491-502.
25. Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd ed., edited by Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin, 1-34. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Swanson, Scott R., and J. Charlene Davis. 2000. A view from the aisle: Classroom successes, failures, and recovery strategies. Marketing Education Review 10 (Summer): 17-25.
27. Swanson, Scott R., and Robert Frankel. 2002. A view from the podium: Classroom successes, failures, and recovery strategies. Marketing Education Review 12 (Summer): 25-35.
28. Weaver, Pamela. 1985. Will the best teaching practice please stand up? Journal of Marketing Education 7 (Fall): 72-78.