Sound-meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 113, Issue 39, 2016, Pages 10818-10823

  Blasi, Damián E ^a,b,c   Wichmann, Søren ^d,e   Hammarström, Harald ^b   Stadler, Peter F ^c,f,g   Christiansen, Morten H ^h,i  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR THE SCIENCE OF HUMAN HISTORY   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICS IN THE SCIENCES   (Germany)

^d LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e KAZAN FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^f UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^g SANTA FE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^h Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

ⁱ AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Cognitive sciences; Iconicity; Language evolution; Linguistics; Sound symbolism

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; BODY REGIONS; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INHERITANCE; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LINGUISTICS; NOSE; PHONATION; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND; SPEECH; STATISTICAL BIAS; TONGUE; VOCALIZATION; AUTOMATION; DECISION MAKING; GEOGRAPHY; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;

AUTOMATION; BIAS; GEOGRAPHY; INTERNATIONALITY; JUDGMENT; LANGUAGE; SOUND;

EID: 84989845300     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1605782113     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Saussure FD (1916) Cours de Linguistique Générale, eds Bally C, Sechehaye A, Riedlienger A (Payot, Paris).
2. Hockett CF (1960) The origin of speech. Sci Am 203:89-96.
3. Pinker S (1999) Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language (Perseus Books, New York).
4. Dingemanse M (2012) Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Lang Linguist Compass 6(10):654-672.
5. Dingemanse M, Blasi DE, Lupyan G, Christiansen MH, Monaghan P (2015) Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends Cogn Sci 19(10):603-615.
6. Monaghan P, Shillcock RC, Christiansen MH, Kirby S (2014) How arbitrary is language? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 369(1651):20130299.
7. Bergen BK (2004) The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language 80:290-311.
8. Monaghan P, Christiansen MH, Chater N (2007) The phonological-distributional coherence hypothesis: Cross-linguistic evidence in language acquisition. Cognit Psychol 55(4):259-305.
9. Köhler W (1929) Gestalt Psychology (Liveright, New York).
10. Ramachandran VS, Hubbard EM (2001) Synaesthesia-a window into perception, thought and language. J Conscious Stud 8(12):3-34.
11. Maurer D, Pathman T, Mondloch CJ (2006) The shape of boubas: Sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Dev Sci 9(3):316-322.
12. Ludwig VU, Adachi I, Matsuzawa T (2011) Visuoauditory mappings between high luminance and high pitch are shared by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(51):20661-20665.
13. Cuskley C, Kirby S (2013) Synaesthesia, cross-modality and language evolution. Oxford Handbook of Synaesthesia, eds Simner J, Hubbard EM (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, UK), pp 869-907.
14. Hinton L, Nichols J, Ohala JJ, eds (2006) Sound Symbolism (Cambridge Univ Press, New York).
15. Berlin B (2006) The first congress of ethnozoological nomenclature. J R Anthropol Inst 12(s1):S23-S44.
16. Imai M, Kita S (2014) The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 369(1651): 20130298.
17. Nuckolls JB (1999) The case for sound symbolism. Annu Rev Anthropol 28:225-252.
18. Reilly J, Hung J, Westbury C (2016) Non arbitrariness in mapping word form to meaning: Cross-linguistic formal markers of word concreteness. Cogn Sci, 10.1111/ cogs.12361.
19. Monaghan P, Christiansen MH, Fitneva SA (2011) The arbitrariness of the sign: Learning advantages from the structure of the vocabulary. J Exp Psychol Gen 140(3): 325-347.
20. Wichmann S, Holman EW, Brown CH (2010) Sound symbolism in basic vocabulary. Entropy 12:844-858.
21. Urban M (2011) Conventional sound symbolism in terms for organs of speech: A crosslinguistic study. Folia Linguist 45(1):199-214.
22. Johansson N, Zlatev J (2013) Motivations for sound symbolism in spatial deixis: A typological study of 101 languages. Public J Semiotics 5(1):3-20.
23. Dingemanse M, Torreira F, Enfield NJ (2013) Is "huh?" a universal word? Conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items. PLoS One 8(11): e78273.
24. Haynie H, Bowern C, Lapalombara H (2014) Sound symbolism in the languages of Australia. PLoS One 9(4):e92852.
25. Wichmann S, et al. (2013) The ASJP Database (Version 16). Available at asjp.clld.org/. Accessed July 2, 2013.
26. Tadmor U, Haspelmath M, Taylor B (2010) Borrowability and the notion of basic vocabulary. Diachronica 27(2):226-246.
27. Hammarström H, Donohue M (2014) Some principles on the use of macro-areas in typological comparison. Lang Dynam Change 4(1):167-187.
28. Napoli DJ, Sanders N, Wright R (2014) On the linguistic effects of articulatory ease, with a focus on sign languages. Language 90(2):424-456.
29. Vitevitch MS, Luce PA (2016) Phonological neighborhood effects in spoken word perception and production. Annu Rev Linguistics 2:75-94.
30. Haspelmath M, Dryer MS, Gil D, Comrie B (2005) The World Atlas of Language Structures (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, UK).
31. Nordhoff S, Hammarström H, Forkel R, Haspelmath M (2013) Glottolog 2.1. Available at glottolog.org. Accessed July 2, 2013.
32. Lockwood G, Dingemanse M (2015) Iconicity in the lab: A review of behavioral, developmental, and neuroimaging research into sound-symbolism. Front Psychol 6:1624.
33. Bateman N (2011) On the typology of palatalization. Lang Linguist Compass 5(8):588-602.
34. Nielsen A, Rendall D (2011) The sound of round: Evaluating the sound-symbolic role of consonants in the classic Takete-Maluma phenomenon. Can J Exp Psychol 65(2): 115-124.
35. Fort M, Martin A, Peperkamp S (2015) Consonants are more important than vowels in the Bouba-kiki effect. Lang Speech 58(Pt 2):247-266.
36. Bankieris K, Simner J (2015) What is the link between synaesthesia and sound symbolism? Cognition 136:186-195.
37. Greenberg JH, Ferguson CA, Moravcsik EA, eds (1978) Universals of Human Language: Phonology (Stanford Univ Press, Stanford, CA), Vol 2.
38. Jakobson R (1960) Why "mama" and "papa." Perspectives in Psychological Theory, Dedicated to Heinz Werner, eds Kaplan B, Wapner S (International Universities Press, New York), pp 124-134.
39. Traunmüller H (1994) Sound symbolism in deictic words. Tongues and Texts Unlimited. Studies in Honour of Tore Jansson on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Anniversary, eds Janson T, Aili H, af Trampe P (Stockholms Universitet, Institutionen för Klassiska Språk, Stockholm), pp 213-234.
40. Bromham L, Hua X, Fitzpatrick TG, Greenhill SJ (2015) Rate of language evolution is affected by population size. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(7):2097-2102.
41. Nygaard LC, Cook AE, Namy LL (2009) Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning. Cognition 112(1):181-186.
42. Ruhlen M (1994) On the Origin of Languages: Studies in Linguistic Taxonomy (Stanford Univ Press, Stanford, CA).
43. Starostin SA, Bronnikov Y (2009) Languages of the World Etymological Database, Part of the Tower of Babel-Evolution of Human Language Project. Available at starling. rinet.ru/cgi-bin/main.cgi?flags=eygtnnl. Accessed May 25, 2015.
44. Pagel M, Atkinson QD, S Calude A, Meade A (2013) Ultraconserved words point to deep language ancestry across Eurasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(21):8471-8476.
45. Steiner L, Stadler PF, Cysouw M (2011) A pipeline for computational historical linguistics. Lang Dynam Change 1(1):89-127.
46. Jäger G (2015) Support for linguistic macrofamilies from weighted sequence alignment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(41):12752-12757.
47. Proctor MI (1995) Gestural characterization of a phonological class: The liquids. PhD dissertation (Yale University, New Haven, CT).
48. MacNeilage PF, Davis BL (2000) On the origin of internal structure of word forms. Science 288(5465):527-531.
49. Campbell L, Poser WJ (2008) Language Classification (Cambridge Univ Press, New York).
50. Lewis P, Simons G, Fennig C (2013) Ethnologue: Languages of the World (SIL International, Dallas, TX).
51. Swadesh M (1955) Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistic dating. Int J Am Linguist 21(2):121-137.
52. Holman EW, et al. (2008) Explorations in automated language classification. Folia Linguist 42(2):331-354.
53. Brown CH, Holman EW, Wichmann S (2013) Sound correspondences in the world's languages. Language 89(1):4-29.
54. North BV, Curtis D, Sham PC (2002) A note on the calculation of empirical P values from Monte Carlo procedures. Am J Hum Genet 71(2):439-441.
55. Strimmer K (2008) fdrtool: A versatile R package for estimating local and tail areabased false discovery rates. Bioinformatics 24(12):1461-1462.
56. Nichols J, Witzlack-Makarevich A, Bickel B (2013) The AUTOTYP Genealogy and Geography Database: 2013 Release (University of Zürich, Zurich). Available at www. autotyp.uzh.ch/. Accessed May 29, 2015.
57. Dunn M, Greenhill SJ, Levinson SC, Gray RD (2011) Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature 473(7345):79-82.
58. Gray RD, Drummond AJ, Greenhill SJ (2009) Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement. Science 323(5913):479-483.
59. Gooskens C, Heeringa W (2004) Perceptive evaluation of Levenshtein dialect distance easurements using Norwegian dialect data. Lang Var Change 16:189-207.
60. Nerbonne J, Heeringa W, Kleiweg P (1999) Edit distance and dialect proximity. Time Warps, String Edits and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison, eds Sankoff D, Kruskal J (CSLI Press, Stanford, CA), pp v-xv.
61. Smithson M, Verkuilen J (2006) A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychol Methods 11(1):54-71.