Consonants are More Important than Vowels in the Bouba-kiki Effect

Language and Speech

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 247-266

  Fort, Mathilde ^a   Martin, Alexander ^a   Peperkamp, Sharon ^a  

^a PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Bouba kiki effect; consonants; French; sound symbolism; vowels

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; RANDOMIZATION; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SYMBOLISM; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SYMBOLISM; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84930446782     PISSN: 00238309     EISSN: 17566053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0023830914534951     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB. (2012). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. CRAN.R project. Retrieved from: http://cran.stat.sfu.ca/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf
2. Bloomfield L.Language. New York, NY: Henry Holt; 1933:
3. Bonatti L. L.,Peña M.,Nespor M.,Mehler J.Linguistic constraints on statistical computations: The role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing.Psychololgical Science. 2005;16 (6): 451-459
4. Bond B.,Stevens S.Cross-modality matching of brightness to loudness by 5-year-olds.Perception & Psychophysics. 1969;6:337-339
5. Bremner A. J.,Caparos S.,Davidoff J.,de Fockert J.,Linnell K. J.,Spence C.“Bouba” and “Kiki” in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape-sound matches, but different shape-taste matches to Westerners.Cognition. 2013;126 (2): 165-172
6. Caramazza A.,Chialant D.,Capasso R.,Miceli G.Separable processing of consonants and vowels.Nature. 2000;403 (6768): 428-430
7. Chastaing M.Le symbolisme des voyelles: Signification des “i”.Journal de Psychologie. 1958;:55,461-481
8. Cutler A.,Sebastian-Galles N.,Soler-Vilageliu O.,van Ooijen B.Constraints of vowels and consonants on lexical selection: Cross-linguistic comparisons.Memory & Cognition. 2000;28 (5): 746-755
9. de Saussure F. D.Course in general linguistics. New York, NY: Philosophical Library; 1959:
10. Fort M.,Weiss A.,Martin A.,Peperkamp S.Proceedings of the 12th international conference on auditory-visual speech processing. Ouni S.Berthommier F.Jesse A., ed. Annecy, France: INRIA; 2013:71-76.
11. Gallace A.,Spence C.Multisensory synesthetic interactions in the speeded classification of visual size.Perception & Psychophysics. 2006;68 (7): 1191-1203
12. Imai M.,Kita S.,Nagumo M.,Okada H.Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning.Cognition. 2008;109 (1): 54-65
13. Kantartzis K.,Imai M.,Kita S.Japanese sound-symbolism facilitates word learning in English-Speaking children.Cognitive Science. 2011;35:575-586
14. Keidel J. L.,Jenison R. L.,Kluender K. R.,Seidenberg M. S.Does grammar constrain statistical learning? Commentary on Bonatti, Peña, Nespor, and Mehler.Psychological Science. 2007 2005;18 (10): 922-923
15. Köhler W.Gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Liveright; 1929:
16. Köhler W.Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. New York, NY: Liveright; 1947:
17. Kovic V.,Plunkett K.,Westermann G.The shape of words in the brain.Cognition. 2010;114 (1): 19-28
18. Lewkowicz D. J.,Turkewitz G.Cross-modal equivalence in early infancy: Auditory-visual intensity matching.Developmental Psychology. 1980;16:597-607
19. Ludwig V. U.,Adachi I.,Matsuzawa T.Visuoauditory mappings between high luminance and high pitch are shared by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA; 2011; 2011. 20661.
20. Marks L. E.On cross-modal similarity: Auditory–visual interactions in speeded discrimination.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1987;13:384-394
21. Marks L. E.Handbook of multisensory processes. Calvert I. G. A.Spence C.Stein B. E., ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004:85-105.
22. Maurer D.,Pathman T.,Mondloch C. J.The shape of boubas: Sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults.Developmental Science. 2006;9 (3): 316-322
23. Mehler J.,Peña M.,Nespor M.,Bonatti L. L.The “soul” of language does not use statistics: Reflections on vowels and consonants.Cortex. 2006;42:846-854
24. Monaghan P.,Mattock K.Integrating constraints for learning word-referent mappings.Cognition. 2012;123 (1): 133-143
25. Monaghan P.,Mattock K.,Walker P.The role of sound symbolism in language learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. 2012;38 (5): 1152-1164
26. Mondloch C. J.,Maurer D.Do small white balls squeak? Pitch–object correspondences in young children.Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2004;4 (2): 133-136
27. Nespor M.,Peña M.,Mehler J.On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition.Lingue e Linguaggio. 2003;2:203-229
28. New B.,Nazzi T.The time course of consonant and vowel processing during word recognition.Language and Cognitive Processes. 2014;29 (2): 147-157
29. Nielsen A. K.,Rendall D.The sound of round: Evaluating the sound-symbolic role of consonants in the classic Takete-Maluma phenomenon.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2011;65 (2): 115-124
30. Nygaard L. C.,Cook A. E.,Namy L. L.Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning.Cognition. 2009;112 (1): 181-186
31. Ozturk O.,Krehm M.,Vouloumanos A.Sound symbolism in infancy: Evidence for sound-shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2013;114 (2): 173-186
32. Parise C. V.,Pavani F.Evidence of sound symbolism in simple vocalizations.Experimental Brain Research. 2011;214 (3): 373-380
33. Parise C. V.,Spence C.Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: A study using the implicit association test.Experimental Brain Research. 2012;220 (3–4): 319-333
34. Peña M.,Mehler J.,Nespor M.The role of audiovisual processing in early conceptual development.Psychological Science. 2011;22 (11): 1419-1421
35. R Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
36. Ramachandran V. S.,Hubbard E. M.Synaesthesia – A window into perception, thought and language.Journal of Consciouness Studies. 2001;8 (12): 3-34
37. Sapir E.A study in phonetic symbolism.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1929;12:225-239
38. Spector F.,Maurer D.Early sound symbolism for vowel sounds.i-Perception. 2013;4 (4): 239-241
39. Spence C.Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review.Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 2011;73 (4): 971-995
40. Sweeny T. D.,Guzman-Martinez E.,Ortega L.,Grabowecky M.,Suzuki S.Sounds exaggerate visual shape.Cognition. 2012;124 (2): 194-200
41. Tarte R. D.Phonetic symbolism in adult native speakers of Czech.Language and Speech. 1974;17:87-94
42. Tarte R. D.The relationship between monosyllables and pure tones: An investigation of phonetic symbolism.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1982;21:352-360
43. Toro J. M.,Nespor M.,Mehler J.,Bonatti L. L.Finding words and rules in a speech stream: Functional differences between vowels and consonants.Psychological Science. 2008;19 (2): 137-144
44. Toro J. M.,Shukla M.,Nespor M.,Endress A. D.The quest for generalizations over consonants: Asymmetries between consonants and vowels are not the by-product of acoustic differences.Perception & Psychophysics. 2008;70 (8): 1515-1525
45. Wagner S.,Winner E.,Cicchetti D.,Gardner H.“Metaphorical” mapping in human infants.Child Development. 1981;52:728-731
46. Walker P.Cross-sensory correspondences and cross talk between dimensions of connotative meaning: Visual angularity is hard, high-pitched, and bright.Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 2012;74 (8): 1792-1809
47. Walker P.,Bremner J. G.,Mason U.,Spring J.,Mattock K.,Slater A.,Johnson S. P.Preverbal infants’ sensitivity to synaesthetic cross-modality correspondences.Psychological Science. 2010;21 (1): 21-25
48. Westbury C.Implicit sound symbolism in lexical access: Evidence from an interference task.Brain and Language. 2005;93 (1): 10-19