Prefixes as access units in visual word recognition: A comparison of Italian and Dutch data

Reading and Writing

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 149-168

  Assink, Egbert M H ^a   Vooijs, Caroline ^a   Knuijt, Paul P N A ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Morphemes; Orthography; Processing unit; Reading ability; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645748277     PISSN: 09224777     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008179825696     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Baayen, R.H. & Schreuder, R. (1996). Modelling the processing of morphologically complex words. In: T. Dijkstra & K. De Smedt (eds.), Computational linguistics AI and Connectionist models of human language processing (pp. 166-191). London: Taylor & Francis.
2. Bergman, M.W., Hudson, P.T.W. & Eling, P.A.T.M. (1988). How simple complex words can be: Morphological processing and word representations, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40A: 41-72.
3. Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In: B. Butterworth (ed.), Language production, Vol. 2: Development, writing, and other language processes (pp. 257-294). London: Academic Press.
4. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A. & Romani (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology, Cognition 28: 297-332.
5. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, C., Jonasson, J. & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In: S. Dornic (ed.), Attention and Performance VI (pp. 535-556). New York: Academic Press.
6. Feldman, L.B., ed. (1995). Morphological aspects of language processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Frost, R. & Katz, L., eds. (1992). Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning. Amsterdam, etc.: North Holland.
8. Henderson, L. (1985). Toward a psychology of morphemes. In: A.W. Ellis (ed.), Progress in the psychology of language, Vol. 1 (pp. 15-72). London: Erlbaum.
9. Jarvella, R.J., Job, R., Sandström, G. & Schreuder, R. (1987). Morphological constraints on word recognition. In: A. Allport, D.G. MacKay, W. Prinz & E. Schreerer (eds.), Language perception and production: Relationships between listening, speaking, reading, and writing (pp. 245-265). London: Academic Press.
10. Laudanna, A., Burani, C. & Cermele, A. (1994). Prefixes as processing units, Language and Cognitive Processes 9(3): 295-316.
11. Marslen-Wilson, M., Tyler, L.K., Waksler, R. & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon, Psychological Review 101: 3-33.
12. Rolf, P.C. & Van Rijnsoever, R.J. (1984). Positionele letterfrekwenties van het Nederlands [Positional letter frequencies in Dutch]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
13. Rubin, G.S., Becker, C.A. & Freeman, R. (1979). Morphological structure and its effects on visual word recognition, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 757-767.
14. Schreuder, R., Grendel, M., Poulisse, N., Roelofs, A. & Van de Voort, M. (1990). Lexical processing, morphological complexity and reading. In: D.A. Balota, G.B. Flores d'Arcais & K. Rayner (eds.) Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 125-141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Schreuder, R. & Baayen, H.R. (1994). Prefix stripping re-revisited, Journal of Memory and Language 33: 357-375.
16. Schreuder, R. & Baayen, H.R. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. Feldman (ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro experimental laboratory user's guide: Computer techniques for real time psychological experimentation. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
18. Taft, M. & Forster, K.I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14: 638-647.
19. Taft, M. (1994). Interactieve-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing, Language and Cognitive Processes 9(3): 271-294.
20. Uit den Boogaart, P. (1975). Woordfrequenties [Word Frequencies]. Utrecht: Oosthoek, Scheltema & Holkema.