Mobilizing senior citizens in co-design of mobile technology

International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 42-67

  Malmborg, Lone ^a   Grönvall, Erik ^a   Messeter, Jörn ^a   Raben, Thomas ^b   Werner, Katharina ^c  

^a IT UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b Frederiksberg Municipality   (Denmark)

^c VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Co Design; Communities of everyday practices; Design culture; H. 5.3. evaluation methodology; Infrastructuring; Mobilization work; Negotiation; Situated elderliness

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; USER INTERFACES;

CO-DESIGNS; EVALUATION/METHODOLOGY; INFRASTRUCTURING; MOBILIZATION WORK; NEGOTIATION; SITUATED ELDERLINESS;

TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT;

EID: 84988383498     PISSN: 1942390X     EISSN: 19423918     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/IJMHCI.2016100103     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Agelab. (2015). AGNES (Age Gain Now Empathy System). Retrieved from http://agelab.mit.edu/agnes-age-gain-now-empathy-system
2. Armstrong, J., Stone, R., & Cox, L. (2014). Customer needs extraction using disability simulation for purposes of inclusive design. Proceedings of ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Buffalo, New York, USA.
3. Bannon, L. (1991). From human factors to human actors: the role of psychology and human-computer interaction studies in system design. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Bjerknes, G., & Bratteteig, T. (1987). Florence in Wonderland: System development with nurses. In G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, M. Kyng, & K. Nygaard (Eds.), Computers and Democracy - a Scandinavian Challenge (pp. 279-295). UK: Avebury.
5. Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P.-A. (2010). Participatory design and "democratizing innovation". Proceedings from PDC'10: The 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (pp. 41-50). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
6. Bødker, S. (2006). When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. Proceedings from NordiCHI 2006: The 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1182475.1182476
7. Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Kammersgaard, J., Kyng, M., & Sundblad, Y. (1987). A Utopian Experience. Proceedings of Conference on Computers and Democracy (pp. 251-278).
8. Bossen, C., and Christensen., L. R., Grönvall, E., & Vestergaard, L. S. (2013). CareCoor: Augmenting the coordination of cooperative home care work. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(5), 189-199. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.10.005 PMID:23127539
9. Brandt, E., Binder, T., Malmborg, L., & Sokoler, T. (2010). Communities of everyday practice and situated elderliness as an approach to co-design for senior interaction. Proceedings from OZCHI '10:The Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 400-403). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1952222.1952314
10. Brandt, E., and Mortensen., P. F., Malmborg, L., Binder, T., & Sokoler, T. (Eds.). (2012). SeniorInteraktion - Innovation gennem dialog. Copenhagen, Denmark: The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, School of Design.
11. Carstensen, L. L., and Fung., H. H., & Charles, S. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 103-123. doi:10.1023/A:1024569803230
12. de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13. Ehn, P. (1993). Scandinavian Design: On Participation and Skill. In D. Schuler & A. Namioka (Eds.), Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
14. Ertner, M. (2015). Infrastructuring design. An ethnographic study of welfare technologies and design in a public-private and user driven innovation project [PhD dissertation]. IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
15. EU AAL. (2013). Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) Joint Programme. Call for Proposals 2013. AAL-2013-6: ICT-based Solutions for Supporting Occupation in Life of Older Adults. Retrieved from http://www.aal-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/AAL-2013-6-call-text-20130326.pdf
16. Fitzpatrick, G., Huldtgren, A., Malmborg, L., Harley, D., & Ijssensteijn, W. (2015). Design for agency, adaptivity and reciprocity: re-imagining AAL and telecare agendas. In D. Randall, K. Schmidt, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Designing Socially Embedded Technologies: A European Challenge. Springer Publishing Company. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-6720-4-13
17. Give&Take. (2015). Official website for the Give&Take project. Retrieved from http://givetake.eu/
18. Grönvall, E., & Kyng, M. (2013). On participatory design of home-based healthcare. Cognition Technology and Work, 15(4), 389-401. doi:10.1007/s10111-012-0226-7
19. Hlauschek, W., Panek, P., Jagos, H., Werner, F., & Werner, K. (2013). The living lab Schwechat as a base for AAL developments for the benefit of the ageing society. Proceedings from the 5th AAL Forum. Norrköping, Sweden (pp. 267-271).
20. Julier, G. (2006). From visual culture to design culture. Design Issues, 22(1), 64-76. doi:10.1162/074793606775247817
21. Kyng, M. (2015). On Creating Sustainable Alternatives: The case of Danish Telehealth. Proceedings from Critical Alternatives. Proceedings of the Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference (pp. 5-17). New York, NY, USA, ACM.
22. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511815355
23. Le Dantec, C., & DiSalvo, C. (2013). Infrastructuring and the Formation of Publics in Participatory Design. Social Studies of Science, 43(2), 241-264. doi:10.1177/0306312712471581
24. Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody designs. An introduction to design for social innovation. MIT Press.
25. Mouffe, C. (2000). The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
26. Olander, S., and Lenskjold., T. U., Yndigegn, S. L., & Foverskov, M. (2011). Mobilizing for community building and everyday innovation. Interaction, 18(4), 28-32. doi:10.1145/1978822.1978829
27. Robertson, T., & Simonsen, J. (2012). Participatory Design: an introduction. In J. Simonsen & T. Robertson (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of participatory design. New York, NY, USA: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203108543.ch1
28. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Fransisco.
29. Sen, R. (2003). Stir it up: Lessons in community organizing and advocacy. Hoboken: Jossey-Bass.
30. Seravalli, A. (2012). Infrastructuring for opening production, from participatory design to participatory making? Proceedings from the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Exploratory Papers, Workshop Descriptions, Industry Cases (Vol. 2, pp. 53-56). Roskilde, Denmark: ACM. doi:10.1145/2348144.2348161
31. Simonsen, J., & Robertson, T. (2012). Routledge international handbook of participatory design. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
32. Star, S. L., & Bowker, G. C. (2006). How to infrastructure. In Handbook of new media: Social shaping and social consequences of ICTs (pp. 230-245). London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.
33. Subasi, Ö., Malmborg, L., Fitzpatrick, G., & Östlund, B. (2014). Reframing design culture and aging. Interaction, 21(2), 70-73. doi:10.1145/2574561
34. Taylor, A. S., & Harper, R. (2003). The gift of the gab? A design oriented sociology of young people's use of mobiles. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12(3), 267-296. doi:10.1023/A:1025091532662
35. Turner, P., Turner, S., & Van De Walle, G. (2007). How older people account for their experiences with interactive technology. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26(4), 287-296. doi:10.1080/01449290601173499
36. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511803932
37. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
38. Wynn, E. (1991). Taking practice seriously. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.