Customer needs extraction using disability simulation for purposes of inclusive design

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 7, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Armstrong, Jessica ^a   Stone, Rob ^a   Cox, Latane ^a  

^a Oregon State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; DESIGN; SALES;

DATA COLLECTION; DISABILITY SIMULATIONS; EMPATHIC DESIGNS; INCLUSIVE DESIGN; MODULAR PRODUCT DESIGN; MODULE IDENTIFICATIONS; PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES; PRODUCT DESIGN METHODOLOGY;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84925988441     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/DETC201434774     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. British Standards Institute. Design management systems. Managing inclusive design. Guide, BSI, 2005.
2. University of Cambridge. (2013). The Inclusive Design Toolkit [Online]. Available at http://www.inclusivedesigntoolkit.com.
3. W.F.E. Preiser, and E. Ostroff, eds., "Universal Design Handbook", McGraw-Hill Inc, New York, 2001.
4. J. Clarkson, R. Coleman, S. Keates, and C. Lebbon, "Inclusive Design: Design for the Whole Population", Springer, 2003.
5. J. Clarkson, S. Keates, "Countering Design Exclusion: An Introduction to Inclusive Design", Springer, 2004.
6. B.R. Connell, M. Jones, R. Mace, J. Mueller, A. Mullick, E. Ostroff, J. Sanford, E. Steinfeld, M. Story, G. Vanderheiden, "The Principles of Universal Design", Center for Universal Design, Raleigh, North Carolina, North Carolina State University, 1997.
7. Center for Inclusive Design and Environmental Access. Universal Design E-World. [Online]. Available at http://udeworld.com/news.html#textbook.
8. C. Nicolle and J. Abascal, "Inclusive Design Guidelines for HCI", London, U.K.: Taylor and Francis, 2001.
9. Dept. of Justice, USA. (2010). 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design [Online]. Available at http://www.ada.gov/regs2010/2010ADAStandards/2010ADAstandards.htm.
10. S. Sangelkar, D. McAdams, "Adapting ADA Architectural Design Knowledge to Product Design: Groundwork for a Function Based Approach, " Proc. of the ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2010.
11. S. Sangelkar and D. McAdams. "Adapting ADA Architectural Design Knowledge to Product Design Using Association Rule Mining, " Journal of Engineering Design, 2010.
12. J. Owens. (2011, Jan 18). The MYP Design Cycle [Online]. Available at http://wmsmc.wikispaces.com/Design+Cycle.
13. K. Otto, K. Wood, "Product design: Techniques in reverse engineering and new product development", Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall, 2001.
14. T&D Publications. Implementing LEED: Strategies that work for the Forest Service [Online]Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/td/pubs/htmlpubs/htm09732802/longdesc/fig05ld.htm.
15. E. Cherry and J. Petronis. (2009). Architectural Programming [Online] Available at http://www.wbdg.org/design/dd-archprogramming.php.
16. L. Veale. (2008). Accessibility: Build it in, don't bolt it on [Online] Available at http://iqcontent.com/blog/2008/04/accessibility-build-it-indont-bolt-it-on/Talks.
17. OXO good grips. [Online] Available at http://www.oxo.com/s-21-good-grips.aspx.
18. R. Stone, K. Wood, R. Crawford, "A Heuristic Method for Identifying Modules for Product Architectures, " Design Studies, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 5-31, 2000.
19. B. Chandrasekaran, R. Stone, D. McAdams, "Developing Design Templates for Product Platform Focused Design, " Journal of Engineering Design, vol. 15, no. 3 pp. 209-228, 2004.
20. R. Stone, K. Wood, R. Crawford, "Using Quantitative Functional Models to Develop Product Architectures, " Design Studies, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 239-260, 2000.
21. D. McAdams, R. Stone, K. Wood, "Functional interdependence and product similarity based on customer needs, " Research in Engineering Design, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1- 19, 1999.
22. K. Hölttä -Otto, K. Otto, "Platform Concept Evaluation: Making the Case for Product Platforms" in "Product Platform and Product Family Design: Methods and Applications", T.W. Simpson, Z. Siddique, J. Jiao, Editor, Springer, 2006.
23. K. Hölttä-Otto, "Modular Product Platform, " Doctoral Dissertation Thesis, Dept. Mech. Eng., Helsinki University of Technology, 2005.
24. A. Ericsson, G. Erixon, "Controlling Design Variants: Modular Product Platforms", New York, ASME Press, 1999.
25. S. Sangelkar, N. Cowen, D. McAdams, "User Activity - Product Function Association Based Design Rules for Universal Products, " Design Studies, 2011.
26. S. Sangelkar, D. McAdams, "Formalizing User Activity - Product Function Association Based Design Rules for Universal Products." Proc. of the ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2011, Washington, DC, ASME, 2011.
27. K. Hunter-Zaworski, D. McAdams, R. Stone, "Collaborative Research: KINdReD: Knowledge and Methods for Inclusive Product Design, " NSF Proposal Number 1200256, unpublished.
28. R. Kurtadikar, R. Stone, M. Van Wie, D. McAdams, "A Customer Need Motivated Conceptual Design Methodology for Product Portfolios, " Proc. of the ASME 2004 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2004, DETC2004-57289, Salt Lake, City, UT, 2004.
29. R. Stone, R. Kurtadikar, N. Villanueva, C. Bryant Arnold, "A Customer Needs Motivated Conceptual Design Methodology for Product Portfolio Planning, " Journal of Engineering Design, Special Issue on Platforming for a Global Marketplace, vol. 19, no. 6, pp.489-514, 2008.
30. E. Von Hippel, "Democratizing Innovation", MIT Press, 2005.
31. D. Leonard, J. Rayport, "Spark Innovation Through Empathic Design, " Harvard Business Review, vol. 75, no. 6, pp.102-113, 1997.
32. M. N. Saunders, C.C. Seepersad, K. Holtta-Otto, "The Characteristics of Innovative, Mechanical Products, " Proc. of the ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 1-10, 2009.
33. The Center the Universal Design at NC State University. (2002). Case Studies on Universal Design. [Online] Available http://www.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/projserv-ps/projects/case-studies/ford.htm.
34. Age Lab. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. AGNES (Age Gain Now Empathy System) [Online] Available at http://agelab.mit.edu/agnes-age-gain-now-empathy-system.
35. Produkt + Projekt Design. Age Simulation Suit GERT [Online]. Available at http://www.age-simulation-suit.com/.
36. University of Cambridge. Cambridge Simulation Gloves [Online]. Available at http://www.inclusivedesigntoolkit.com/betterdesign2/gloves/gloves.html.
37. Georgia Tech Research Institute. Georgia Institute of Technology. Arthritis Simulation Gloves [Online]. Available at http://hseb.gtri.gatech.edu/gloves.php.
38. A. Rahrer, "Designing and Creating the Oregon State Age and Disability Simulation Suit, " MS Thesis, Oregon State University, 2013.
39. WHO, "International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health", Geneva, World Health Organization, 2001.
40. V. Mathiowetz, K. Weber, N. Kashman, and G. Volland, "Adult Norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of Finger Dexterity." The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 5:1.
41. Griffen, A. and Hauser, J., "The Voice of the Customer, " Marketing Science, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-27, 1993.