Social media in emergency management: Twitter as a tool for communicating risks to the public

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 111, Issue , 2016, Pages 86-96

  Panagiotopoulos, Panos ^a   Barnett, Julie ^b   Bigdeli, Alinaghi Ziaee ^c   Sams, Steven ^d  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

^c ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Crisis and emergency risk communication model; Emergency management; Social amplification of risk; Social media; Technological impact

Indexed keywords

CIVIL DEFENSE; DISASTERS; PUBLIC RISKS; RISKS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT; EMERGENCY RISK; SOCIAL AMPLIFICATION OF RISKS; SOCIAL MEDIA; TECHNOLOGICAL IMPACT;

RISK MANAGEMENT;

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; COMMUNICATION; CRISIS MANAGEMENT; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; MEDIA ROLE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL MEDIA; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84988349897     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. ’t Hart, P., After Fukushima: reflections on risk and institutional learning in an era of mega-crises. Public Adm. 91 (2013), 101–113.
2. Al-Saggaf, Y., Simmons, P., Social media in Saudi Arabia: exploring its use during two natural disasters. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 95 (2014), 3–15.
3. Ansell, C., Boin, A., Keller, A., Managing Transboundary crises: identifying the building blocks of an effective response system. J. Conting. Crisis Manag. 18 (2010), 195–207.
4. Barnett, J., Burningham, K., Walker, G., Cass, N., Imagined publics and engagement around renewable energy technologies in the UK. Public Underst. Sci. 21 (2012), 36–50.
5. BBC, Snow shuts nearly 7,000 schools across the UK. 2010 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-11898712, (accessed 01/11/2014).
6. Boin, A., ‘t Hart, P., Organising for effective emergency management: lessons from Research1. Aust. J. Public Adm. 69 (2010), 357–371.
7. Breakwell, G.M., Barnett, J., Social amplification of risk and the layering method. Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R.E., Slovic, P., (eds.) The Social Amplification of Risk, 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 80–101.
8. Brenkert-Smith, H., Dickinson, K.L., Champ, P.A., Flores, N., Social amplification of wildfire risk: the role of social interactions and information sources. Risk Anal. 33 (2013), 800–817.
9. Burnap, P., Rana, O.F., Avis, N., Williams, M., Housley, W., Edwards, A., Morgan, J., Sloan, L., Detecting tension in online communities with computational Twitter analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 95 (2013), 96–108.
10. Burns, W.J., Slovic, P., Kasperson, R.E., Kasperson, J.X., Renn, O., Emani, S., Incorporating structural models into research on the social amplification of risk: implications for theory construction and decision making. Risk Anal. 13 (1993), 611–623.
11. Chatfield, A.T., Scholl, H.J., Brajawidagda, U., Tsunami early warnings via Twitter in government: net-savvy citizens’ co-production of time-critical public information services. Gov. Inf. Q. 30 (2013), 377–386.
12. Chew, C., Eysenbach, G., Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS One, 5, 2010, e14118.
13. Chung, I.J., Social amplification of risk in the internet environment. Risk Anal. 31 (2011), 1883–1896.
14. CNN, As Sandy pounded NYC, fire department worker was a twitter lifeline. http://edition.cnn.com/2012/11/01/tech/social-media/twitter-fdny/, 2012 (accessed 01/03/2014).
15. Comfort, L.K., Crisis management in hindsight: cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Adm. Rev. 67 (2007), 189–197.
16. Comfort, L.K., Boin, A., Demchak, C.C., Designing Resilience: Preparing for Extreme Events. 2010, University of Pittsburgh Press.
17. Comfort, L.K., Waugh, W.L., Cigler, B.A., Emergency management research and practice in public administration: emergence, evolution, expansion, and future directions. Public Adm. Rev. 72 (2012), 539–547.
18. Dorasamy, M., Raman, M., Kaliannan, M., Knowledge management systems in support of disasters management: a two decade review. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 80 (2013), 1834–1853.
19. Fielding, N.G., Lee, R.M., Blank, G., The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. 2008, SAGE Publications, London.
20. Gaspar, R., Pedro, C., Panagiotopoulos, P., Seibt, B., Beyond positive or negative: qualitative sentiment analysis of social media reactions to unexpected stressful events. Comput. Hum. Behav. 56 (2016), 179–191.
21. Guardian, London riots: how BlackBerry Messenger played a key role. http://www.theguardian.com/media/2011/aug/08/london-riots-facebook-twitter-blackberry, 2011 (accessed 01/11/2014).
22. Guardian, Reading the riots: investigating England's summer of disorder. http://www.theguardian.com/uk/interactive/2011/dec/14/reading-the-riots-investigating-england-s-summer-of-disorder-full-report, 2012 (accessed 01/11/2014).
23. Hale, J.E., Crisis response communication challenges: building theory from qualitative data. J. Bus. Commun. 42 (2005), 112–134.
24. Harrald, J.R., Agility and discipline: critical success factors for disaster response. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 604 (2006), 256–272.
25. Helsloot, I., Groenendaal, J., Twitter: an underutilized potential during sudden crises?. J. Conting. Crisis Manag. 21 (2013), 178–183.
26. Henstra, D., Evaluating local government emergency management programs: what framework should public managers adopt?. Public Adm. Rev. 70 (2010), 236–246.
27. Heverin, T., Zach, L., Use of microblogging for collective sense-making during violent crises: a study of three campus shootings. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63 (2012), 34–47.
28. Horsley, J.S., Barker, R.T., Toward a synthesis model for crisis communication in the public sector: an initial investigation. J. Bus. Tech. Commun. 16 (2002), 406–440.
29. Jung, K.J., Park, H.W., Citizens’ social media use and homeland security information policy: some evidences from Twitter users during the 2013 North Korea nuclear test. Gov. Inf. Q. 31 (2014), 563–573.
30. Jung, K., Park, H.W., Tracing interorganizational information networks during the emergency response period: a Webometric approach to the 2012 Gumi chemical spill in South Korea. Gov. Inf. Q. 33 (2016), 133–141.
31. Kapucu, N., Collaborative emergency management: better community organising, better public preparedness and response. Disasters 32 (2008), 239–262.
32. Kasperson, R.E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H.S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J.X., Ratick, S., The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Anal. 8 (1988), 177–187.
33. Kavanaugh, A.L., Fox, E.A., Sheetz, S.D., Yang, S., Li, L.T., Shoemaker, D.J., Natsev, A., Xie, L., Social media use by government: from the routine to the critical. Gov. Inf. Q. 29 (2012), 480–491.
34. Krippendorff, K., Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. third ed, 2013, SAGE Publications, California, USA.
35. Lodge, M., The public management of risk: the case for deliberating among worldviews. Rev. Policy Res. 26 (2009), 395–408.
36. Macias, W., Hilyard, K., Freimuth, V., Blog functions as risk and crisis communication during hurricane Katrina. J. Comput. Commun. 15 (2009), 1–31.
37. Marwick, A.E., Boyd, D., I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media Soc. 13 (2013), 114–133.
38. Mergel, I., “Take a risk, save a life”: social media in emergency management. PA Times, 36, 2013, 13.
39. Mergel, I., Bretschneider, S.I., A three-stage adoption process for social media use in government. Public Adm. Rev. 73 (2013), 390–400.
40. Met Office, The big freeze — Nov/Dec 2010. http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/who/how/case-studies/big-freeze, 2014 (accessed 03/10/2014).
41. Mileti, D., Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States. 1999, Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC.
42. Mileti, D.S., Peek, L., The social psychology of public response to warnings of a nuclear power plant accident. J. Hazard. Mater. 75 (2000), 181–194.
43. Murthy, D., Twitter: Digital Media and Society Series. 2013, Polity Press, Cambridge.
44. Neubaum, G., Rösner, L., Rosenthal-von der Pütten, A.M., Krämer, N.C., Psychosocial functions of social media usage in a disaster situation: a multi-methodological approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 34 (2014), 28–38.
45. Oh, O., Agrawal, M., Rao, H.R., Community intelligence and social media services: a rumour theoretic analysis of Tweets during social crises. MIS Q. 37 (2013), 407–426.
46. Palen, L., Vieweg, S., Anderson, K.M., Supporting “everyday analysts” in safety- and time-critical situations. Inf. Soc. 27 (2010), 52–62.
47. Panagiotopoulos, P., Bigdeli, A.Z., Sams, S., Citizen–government collaboration on social media: the case of Twitter in the 2011 riots in England. Gov. Inf. Q. 31 (2014), 349–357.
48. Pidgeon, N.F., Barnett, J., Chalara and the Social Amplification of Risk. 2013, Department for Envrionment, Food and Rural Affairs.
49. Pidgeon, N.F., Kasperson, R.K., Slovic, P., The Social Amplification of Risk. 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
50. Procter, R., Crump, J., Karstedt, S., Voss, A., Cantijoch, M., Reading the riots: what were the police doing on Twitter?. Polic. Soc. 23 (2013), 413–436.
51. Rains, S.A., Brunner, S.R., Oman, K., Social media and risk communication. The SAGE Handbook of Risk Communication, 2014, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 228–241.
52. Renn, O., Risk communication and the social amplification of risk. Kasperson, R.E., Stallen, P.J.M., (eds.) Communicating Risks to the Public, 1991, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 287–324.
53. Reynolds, B., Seeger, M.W., Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. J. Health Commun. 10 (2005), 43–55.
54. Rickard, L.N., McComas, K.A., Clarke, C.E., Stedman, R.C., Decker, D.J., Exploring risk attenuation and crisis communication after a plague death in Grand Canyon. J. Risk Res. 16 (2013), 145–167.
55. Riots Panel, 5 days in August: an interim report on the 2011 English riots. riotspanel.independent.gov.uk, 2011 (accessed 05/08/2013).
56. Seawright, J., Gerring, J., Case selection techniques in case study research: a menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Polit. Res. Q. 61 (2008), 294–308.
57. Sellnow, T.L., Seeger, M.W., Theorizing Crisis Communication. first ed, 2013, Wiley-Blackwell.
58. Smith, D., McCloskey, J., Risk and crisis management in the public sector: risk communication and the social amplification of public sector risk. Public Money Manag. 18 (1998), 41–50.
59. Somers, S., Svara, J.H., Assessing and managing environmental risk: connecting local government management with emergency management. Public Adm. Rev. 69 (2009), 181–193.
60. Sutton, J., Spiro, E.S., Johnson, B., Fitzhugh, S., Gibson, B., Butts, C.T., Warning tweets: serial transmission of messages during the warning phase of a disaster event. Inform. Commun. Soc. 17 (2013), 765–787.
61. Turoff, M., Hiltz, S.R., Bañuls, V.A., Van Den Eede, G., Bañuls, V.A., Multiple perspectives on planning for emergencies: an introduction to the special issue on planning and foresight for emergency preparedness and management. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 80 (2013), 1647–1656.
62. Twitter Alerts, Authorities that participate in twitter alerts. https://about.twitter.com/products/alerts/participating-organizations, 2015 (accessed 01/09/2015).
63. Veil, S., Reynolds, B., Sellnow, T.L., Seeger, M.W., CERC as a theoretical framework for research and practice. Health Promot. Pract. 9 (2008), 26S–34S.
64. Veil, S.R., Buehner, T., Palenchar, M.J., A work-in-process literature review: incorporating social media in risk and crisis communication. J. Conting. Crisis Manag. 19 (2011), 110–122.
65. Waters, R.D., Williams, J.M., Squawking, tweeting, cooing, and hooting: analyzing the communication patterns of government agencies on Twitter. J. Public Aff. 11 (2011), 353–363.
66. Wendling, C., Radisch, J., Jacobzone, S., The use of social media in risk and crisis communication. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, 2013, 1–42.
67. Zulean, M., Prelipcean, G., Emergency preparedness in Romania: dynamics, shortcomings and policy proposals. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 80 (2013), 1714–1724.