Social Amplification of Wildfire Risk: The Role of Social Interactions and Information Sources

Risk Analysis

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 800-817

  Brenkert Smith, Hannah ^a   Dickinson, Katherine L ^b   Champ, Patricia A ^c   Flores, Nicholas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^c ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Risk perception; Social amplification of risk (SAR); Social interactions; Wildfire risk information

Indexed keywords

EXPERT INFORMATIONS; INFORMAL INTERACTIONS; PERCEPTIONS OF RISKS; RISK INTERDEPENDENCIES; SOCIAL AMPLIFICATION OF RISKS; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; WESTERN UNITED STATES; WILDFIRE RISKS;

AMPLIFICATION; FIRES; RISK MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

RISK PERCEPTION;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; HOMEOWNER; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; RISK PERCEPTION; WILDFIRE;

ARTICLE; FIRE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

COLORADO; FIRES; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

COLORADO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84877589358     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01917.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, Brown HS, Emel J, Goble R, Kasperson JX, Ratick S. The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 1988; 8(2):177- 187.
2. Scherer C, Cho H. A social network contagion theory of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 2003; 23:261-267.
3. Binder AR, Scheufele DA, Brossard D, Gunther AC. Interpersonal amplification of risk? Citizen discussions and their impact on perceptions of risks and benefits of a biological research facility. Risk Analysis, 2010; 31(2):324-334.
4. Masuda JR, Garvin T. Place, culture, and the social amplification of risk. Risk Analysis, 2006; 26(2):437-454.
5. Radeloff, VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI, Fried JS, Holcomb SS, McKeefry JF. The wildland-urban interface in the United States. Ecological Applications, 2005; 15(3):799-805.
6. Jakes P. Social science informing forest management-Bringing new knowledge to fuels managers. Journal of Forestry, 2007; 105(3):120-124.
7. Cohn PJ, Williams DR, Carroll MS. Wildland-urban interface resident's views on risk and attribution. Pp. 23-43 in Martin WE, Raish C, Kent B (eds). Wildfire Risk: Human Perceptions and Management Implications. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press, 2008.
8. Gordon JS, Matarrita-Cascante D, Stedman RC, Luloff AE. Wildfire perception and community change. Rural Sociology, 2010; 75(3):455-477.
9. Martin IM, Bender H, Raish C. What motivates individuals to protect themselves from risks: The case of wildland fire. Risk Analysis, 2007; 27(4):887-900.
10. McGee TK, McFarlane BL, Varghese J. An examination of the influence of hazard experience on wildfire risk perceptions and adoption of mitigation measures. Society & Natural Resources, 2009; 22(4):308-323.
11. Hall TE, Slothower M. Cognitive factors affecting homeowners' reactions to defensible space in the Oregon Coast Range. Society & Natural Resources, 2009; 22(2):95-110.
12. McCaffrey S. What does "wildfire risk" mean to the public?Pp. 33-45 in McCaffrey S (ed). The Public and Wildland Fire Management: Social Science Findings for Managers. General Technical Report NRS-1. Newton Square, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 2006.
13. MacGregor G, Finucane M, Gonzalez-Caban A. The effects of risk perception and adaptation on health and safety interventions. Pp. 142-155 in Martin WE, Raish, C, Kent B (eds). Wildfire Risk: Human Perceptions and Management Implications. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press, 2008.
14. Tversky A, Kahneman D (eds). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
15. Stallings RA. Promoting Risk: Constructing the Earthquake Threat. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1995.
16. Renn O, Burns WJ, Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Slovic P. The social amplification of risk: Theoretical foundations and empirical applications. Journal of Social Issues, 1992; 48(4):137-160.
17. Turner BL II, Kasperson RD, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers L, Moartello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. PNAS, 2003; 100(14):8074-8079.
18. National year-to-date report on fires and acres burned by state. National Interagency Fire Center, 2010. Available at: http://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireInfo_stats_YTD2010.html. Accessed on April 7, 2012.
19. Lightning vs. human caused fires and acres (by Geographic Area). National Interagency Fire Center, 2011. Available at: http://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireInfo_stats_lightng.html. Accessed on April 7, 2012.
20. Fire status and losses. Available at: http://www.inciweb.org. Accessed on July 3, 2012.
21. Cohen, J. Preventing disaster: Home ignitability in the wildland-urban interface. Journal of Forestry, 2000; 98:15-21.
22. Kunreuther H, Heal G. Interdependent security. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2003; 26(2/3):231-249.
23. Slovic, P. Perception of Risk. London: Earthscan Publications, 2000.
24. Cortner HJ, Zwolinski MJ, Carpenter EH, Taylor J. Public support for fire-management policy. Journal of Forestry, 1989; 87(6):359-361.
25. Carpenter EH, Taylor JG, Cortner HJ, Gardner PD, Zwolinski MJ, Daniel TC. Targeting audiences and content for forest fire information programs. Journal of Environmental Education, 1986; 17(3):33-41.
26. McCaffrey SM. For Want of Defensible Space a Forest is Lost: Homeowners and the Wildfire Hazard and Mitigation in Residential Wildland Intermix at Incline Village, Nebraska [dissertation]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.
27. Toman E, Shindler B, Brunson M. Fire and fuel management communication strategies: Citizen evaluations of agency outreach activities. Society and Natural Resources, 2006; 19:321-336.
28. McCaffrey SM. Fighting fire with education: What is the best way to reach out to homeowners? Journal of Forestry, 2004; 102(5):12-19.
29. Lion R, Meertens RM, Bot I. Priorities in information desire about unknown risks. Risk Analysis, 2002; 22(4):765-776.
30. Griffin RJ, Dunwoody S, Neuwirth K. Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environmental Research, 1999; 80(2):S230-S245.
31. Coleman JS. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 1988; 94:S95-S120.
32. Putnam R. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000.
33. Agrawal S, Monroe MC. Using and improving social capital to increase community preparedness for wildfire. Pp. 163-167 in McCaffrey S (ed). The Public and Wildland Fire Management: Social Science Findings for Managers. Newton Square PA: USDA Forest Service GTR NRS-1, November 2006.
34. Prell C, Reed M, Racin L, Hubacek K. Competing structure, competing views: The role of formal and informal social structures in shaping stakeholder perceptions. Ecology and Society, 2010; 15(4):34-52.
35. Reagans R, McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003; 48(2):240-267.
36. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 2001; 27:415-444.
37. Gude P, Rasker R, van den Noort J. Potential for future development on fire-prone lands. Journal of Forestry, 2008; 106(4):198-205.
38. Gustafson, PE. Gender differences in risk perception: Theoretical and methodological perspectives. Risk Analysis, 1998; 18(6):805-811.
39. Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK. Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis, 1994; 14:1101-1108.
40. Slovic P. 1997. Trust, emotion, sex, politics and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Pp. 277-313 in Bazerman M, Messick D, Tenbrusel A, Wade-Benzoni K (eds).Environment, Ethics and Behavior. San Francisco: New Lexington Press; 1997.
41. Veblen TT, Kitzenberger T, Donnegan J. Climatic and human influences on fire regimes in Ponderosa pine forests in the Colorado Front Range. Ecological Applications, 2000; 10(4):1178-1195.
42. Boulder county wildfire protection plan 2011. Available at: http://www.bouldercounty.org/find/library/build/cwppbooklowres.pdf. Accessed on July 3, 2012.
43. Larimer county fire plan 2006 Available at: http://csfs.colostate.edu/pages/documents/LarimerCountyfire_plan.pdf. Accessed on July 3, 2012.
44. Slovic P. 1997. Trust, emotion, sex, politics and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Pp. 277-313 in Bazerman M, Messick D, Tenbrusel A, Wade-Benzoni K (eds). Environment, Ethics and Behavior. San Francisco: New Lexington Press; 1997.
45. Champ PA, Brenkert-Smith H, Flores N. Living with Wildfire in Boulder County, Colorado. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 2007. Research Note RMRS-RN-47, 2012.
46. Champ PA, Brenkert-Smith H, Flores N. Living with Wildfire in Larimer County, Colorado, Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 2007. Research Note RMRS-RN-48, 2012.
47. Brenkert-Smith H, Champ P, Flores N. Insights into wildfire mitigation decisions among wildland-urban interface residents. Society & Natural Resources, 2006; 19:759-768.
48. Jolliffe IT. Principal Component Analysis, second edition. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002
49. Cohen, J. Wildland-urban fire - A different approach. Report available at: http://www.nps.gov/fire/download/pub_pub_wildlandurbanfire.pdf. Accessed March 7, 2012.
50. Martin WE, Martin IM, Kent B. The role of risk perceptions in the risk mitigation process: The case of wildfire in high risk communities. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009; 91(2):489-498.
51. Winter G, Fried JS. Homeowner perspectives on fire hazard, responsibility, and management strategies at the wildland-urban interface. Society and Natural Resources, 2000; 13:33-49.
52. Tierney KJ, Lindell MK, Perry RW. Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press, 2001.
53. Armor DA, Taylor SE. When predictions fail: The dilemma of unrealistic optimism. P. 334 in Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D (eds). Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge: 2002.
54. Johnson JF, Bengston DN, Nelson KC, Fan DP. Defensible space in the news: Public discussion of a neglected topic. Pp. 169-174 in McCaffrey SM (ed). The Public and Wildland Fire Management: Social Science Findings for Managers. Gen.Tech.Report NRS-1. Newton Square, PA. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 2006.
55. Frewer LJ, Miles S, Marsh R. The media and genetically modified foods: Evidence in support of social amplification of risk. Risk Analysis, 2002; 22:701-711.
56. Freudenburg WR, Coleman CL, Gonzales J, Helgeland C. Media coverage of hazard events: Analyzing the assumptions. Risk Analysis, 1996; 16:31-42.
57. Wahlberg AAF, Sjoberg L. Risk perception and the media. Journal of Risk Research, 2000; 3(1):31-50.