Flavour preferences in youth versus adults: A review

Tobacco Control

Volumn 25, Issue , 2016, Pages ii32-ii39

  Hoffman, Allison C ^a   Salgado, Raydel Valdes ^b   Dresler, Carolyn ^a   Faller, Rachel Williams ^b   Bartlett, Christopher ^b  

^a CENTER FOR TOBACCO PRODUCTS   (United States)

^b SciMetrika   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLAVORING AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; CHILD; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGY; SMOKELESS TOBACCO; SMOKING; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TOBACCO; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; CHILD; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; ELECTRONIC NICOTINE DELIVERY SYSTEMS; FLAVORING AGENTS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; SMOKING; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; TOBACCO, SMOKELESS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84987858891     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053192     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Deeming tobacco products to be subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act; regulations on the sale and distribution of tobacco products and required warning statements for tobacco products. Proposed rule. Fed Regist 2014;79:23142–207.
2. World Health Organization (WHO). The scientific basis of tobacco product regulation. Technical Report Series. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2007.
3. Carpenter C, Wayne G, Pauly J, et al. New cigarette brands with flavors that appeal to youth: tobacco marketing strategies. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24:1601–10.
4. King BA, Tynan MA, Dube SR, et al. Flavored-little-cigar and flavored-cigarette use among U.S. middle and high school students. J Adolesc Health 2014;54:40–6.
5. King BA, Dube SR, Tynan MA. Flavored cigar smoking among U.S. adults: findings from the 2009–2010 National Adult Tobacco Survey. Nicotine Tob Res 2013;15:608–14.
6. Zhu SH, Sun JY, Bonnevie E, et al. Four hundred and sixty brands of e-cigarettes and counting: implications for product regulation. Tob Control 2014;23(Suppl 3): iii3–9.
7. Cowart B, Beauchamp G, Mennella J. Development of taste and smell in the neonate. In: Polin R, Fox W, Abman S, eds. Fetal and neonatal physiology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier, 2011:1899–907.
8. Lawless H, Heyman H. Sensory evaluation of food. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media, 1999.
9. Forestell CA, Mennella J. The ontogeny of taste perception and preference throughout the childhood. In: Doty R, ed. Handbook of olfaction and gustation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2015:795–826.
10. Bachmanov AA, Beauchamp GK. Taste receptor genes. Annu Rev Nutr 2007;27:389–414.
11. Schwartz C, Issanchou S, Nicklaus S. Developmental changes in the acceptance of the five basic tastes in the first year of life. Br J Nutr 2009;102:1375–85.
12. Engen T. The potential usefulness of sensations of odor and taste in keeping children away from harmful substances. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1974;237:224–8.
13. Lanfer A, Knof K, Barba G, et al. Taste preferences in association with dietary habits and weight status in European children: results from the IDEFICS study. Int J Obes (Lond) 2012;36:27–34.
14. Lanfer A, Bammann K, Knof K, et al. Predictors and correlates of taste preferences in European children: the IDEFICS study. Food Qual Prefer 2013;27:128–36.
15. Cooke LJ, Wardle J. Age and gender differences in children’s food preferences. Br J Nutr 2005;93:741–6.
16. Beauchamp GK, Moran M. Dietary experience and sweet taste preference in human infants. Appetite 1982;3:139–52.
17. Beauchamp GK, Moran M. Acceptance of sweet and salty tastes in 2-year-old children. Appetite 1984;5:291–305.
18. De Graaf C, Zandstra EH. Sweetness intensity and pleasantness in children, adolescents, and adults. Physiol Behav 1999;67:513–20.
19. Liem DG, Mars M, de Graaf C. Consistency of sensory testing with 4-and 5-year-old children. Food Qual Prefer 2004;15:541–8.
20. Mennella JA, Finkbeiner S, Lipchock SV, et al. Preferences for salty and sweet tastes are elevated and related to each other during childhood. PLoS ONE 2014;9: e92201.
21. Mennella JA, Finkbeiner S, Reed DR. The proof is in the pudding: children prefer lower fat but higher sugar than do mothers. Int J Obes (Lond) 2012;36:1285–91.
22. Nu CT, MacLeod P, Barthelemy J. Effects of age and gender on adolescents’ food habits and preferences. Food Qual Prefer 1996;7:251–62.
23. Desor JA, Beauchamp GK. Longitudinal changes in sweet preferences in humans. Physiol Behav 1987;39:639–42.
24. Mennella JA, Lukasewycz LD, Griffith JW, et al. Evaluation of the monell forced-choice, paired-comparison tracking procedure for determining sweet taste preferences across the lifespan. Chem Senses 2011;36:345–55.
25. Thompson JL, Gerard PD, Drake MA. Chocolate milk and the Hispanic consumer. J Food Sci 2007;72:S666–675.
26. Monneuse MO, Bellisle F, Louis-Sylvestre J. Impact of sex and age on sensory evaluation of sugar and fat in dairy products. Physiol Behav 1991;50:1111–17.
27. Liem DG, de Graaf C. Sweet and sour preferences in young children and adults: role of repeated exposure. Physiol Behav 2004;83:421–9.
28. Copeland J, Stevenson RJ, Gates P, et al. Young Australians and alcohol: the acceptability of ready-to-drink (RTD) alcoholic beverages among 12–30-year-olds. Addiction 2007;102:1740–6.
29. Murphy C, Withee J. Age-related differences in the pleasantness of chemosensory stimuli. Psychol Aging 1986;1:312–18.
30. Deglaire A, Mejean C, Castetbon K, et al. Associations between weight status and liking scores for sweet, salt and fat according to the gender in adults (The Nutrinet-Sante study). Eur J Clin Nutr 2015;69:40–6.
31. Schiffman SS, Graham BG, Sattely-Miller EA, et al. Elevated and sustained desire for sweet taste in African-Americans: a potential factor in the development of obesity. Nutrition 2000;16:886–93.
32. Logue AW, Smith ME. Predictors of food preferences in adult humans. Appetite 1986;7:109–25.
33. Knaapila A, Hwang LD, Lysenko A, et al. Genetic analysis of chemosensory traits in human twins. Chem Senses 2012;37:869–81.
34. de Graaf C, Polet P, van Staveren WA. Sensory perception and pleasantness of food flavors in elderly subjects. J Gerontol 1994;49:P93–99.
35. Zandstra EH, de Graaf C. Sensory perception and pleasantness of orange beverages from childhood to old age. Food Qual Prefer 1998;9:5–12.
36. Enns MP, Van Itallie TB, Grinker JA. Contributions of age, sex and degree of fatness on preferences and magnitude estimations for sucrose in humans. Physiol Behav 1979;22:999–1003.
37. Beauchamp GK, Cowart B. Preferences for high salt concentration among children. Dev Psychol 1990;26:539–45.
38. Verma P, Mittal S, Ghildiyal A, et al. Salt preference: age and sex related variability. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2007;51:91–5.
39. Desor JA, Greene LS, Maller O. Preferences for sweet and salty in 9- to 15-year-old and adult humans. Science 1975;190:686–7.
40. Zallen EM, Hooks LB, O’Brien K. Salt taste preferences and perceptions of elderly and young adults. J Am Diet Assoc 1990;90:947–50.
41. Liem DG, Mennella JA. Heightened sour preferences during childhood. Chem Senses 2003;28:173–80.
42. Capaldi ED, Privitera GJ. Decreasing dislike for sour and bitter in children and adults. Appetite 2008;50:139–45.
43. Chauhan J, Hawrysh ZJ. Suprathreshold sour taste intensity and pleasantness perception with age. Physiol Behav 1988;43:601–7.
44. Drewnowski A, Kristal A, Cohen J. Genetic taste responses to 6-n-propylthiouracil among adults: a screening tool for epidemiological studies. Chem Senses 2001;26:483–9.
45. Mennella JA, Pepino MY, Beauchamp GK. Modification of bitter taste in children. Dev Psychobiol 2003;43:120–7.
46. Schmidt HJ, Beauchamp GK. Adult-like odor preferences and aversions in three-year-old children. Child Dev 1988;59:1136–43.
47. Forestell CA, Mennella JA. Children’s hedonic judgments of cigarette smoke odor: effects of parental smoking and maternal mood. Psychol Addict Behav 2005;19:423–32.
48. Rinck F, Barkat-Defradas M, Chakirian A, et al. Ontogeny of odor liking during childhood and its relation to language development. Chem Senses 2011;36:83–91.
49. Laing DG, Clark PJ. Puberty and olfactory preferences of males. Physiol Behav 1983;30:591–7.
50. Kniep EH, Morgan WL, Young PT. Individual differences in affective reactions to odors. Am J Psychol 1931;43:406–21.
51. Aliani M, Ryland D, Pierce GN. Effect of flax addition on the flavor profile and acceptability of bagels. J Food Sci 2012;77:S62–70.
52. Liem DG, Zandstra L, Thomas A. Prediction of children’s flavour preferences. Effect of age and stability in reported preferences. Appetite 2010;55:69–75.
53. Murphy C. Age-related effects on the threshold, psychophysical function, and pleasantness of menthol. J Gerontol 1983;38:217–22.
54. Coldwell SE, Oswald TK, Reed DR. A marker of growth differs between adolescents with high vs. low sugar preference. Physiol Behav 2009;96:574–80.
55. Conner MT, Booth DA. Preferred sweetness of a lime drink and preference for sweet over non-sweet foods, related to sex and reported age and body weight. Appetite 1988;10:25–35.
56. Beauchamp GK, Cowart BJ, Moran M. Developmental changes in salt acceptability in human infants. Dev Psychobiol 1986;19:17–25.
57. Moncrieff RW. Odour preferences. Leonard Hill, 1966.
58. Wysocki CJ, Gilbert AN. National Geographic Smell Survey. Effects of age are heterogenous. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1989;561:12–28.
59. Wysocki CJ, Pelchat ML. The effects of aging on the human sense of smell and its relationship to food choice. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1993;33:63–82.
60. Mart S. Alcohol marketing in the 21st century: new methods, old problems. Subst Use Misuse 2011;46:889–92.
61. Rossheim M, Thombs D. Multiple fruit-flavored alcoholic drinks in a can (MFAC): an overlooked class of potentially harmful alcohol products. Am J Drug Alcohol Ab 2013;39:280–3.
62. Office on Smoking and Health. Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: a report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2012.
63. Eissenberg T, Balster R. Initial tobacco use episodes in children and adolescents: current knowledge, future directions. Drug Alcohol Depend 2000;59(Suppl 1): S41–60.
64. Brown and Williamson. Tobacco Corporation. Marketing Innovations Incorporated project report. Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, 1972; Bates No. 170042014.
65. Reynolds RJ. The new Camel Exotic Blends—Cinnzabar, Izmir Stinger, Basma. Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, 2000; Bates No. 525090316-0322.
66. Barbeau AM, Burda J, Siegel M. Perceived efficacy of e-cigarettes versus nicotine replacement therapy among successful e-cigarette users: a qualitative approach. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2013;8:5.
67. Griffiths MA, Harmon TR, Gilly MC. Hubble bubble trouble: the need for education about and regulation of Hookah smoking. J Public Policy Mark 2011;30:119–32.
68. Lawrence D, Cadman B, Hoffman AC. Sensory properties of menthol and smoking topography. Tob Induc Dis 2011;9(Suppl 1):S3.
69. Wayne GF, Connolly GN. Application, function, and effects of menthol in cigarettes: a survey of tobacco industry documents. Nicotine Tob Res 2004;6(Suppl 1):S43–54.
70. Wise PM, Preti G, Eades J, et al. The effect of menthol vapor on nasal sensitivity to chemical irritation. Nicotine Tob Res 2011;13:989–97.
71. Brown J, Luo W, Isabelle L, et al. Correspondence: candy flavoring in tobacco. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2250–2.